{"title":"床头抬高的Macintosh喉镜与仰卧位C-MAC视频喉镜下喉部暴露的比较:一项随机非效性试验。","authors":"Prashant Sirohiya, Hari Krishna Raju Sagiraju, Vasudha Ahuja, Nishkarsh Gupta, Vinod Kumar, Brajesh Kumar Ratre, Balbir Kumar, Saurabh Vig, Raghav Gupta, Shweta Bhopale, Anuja Pandit, Sushma Bhatnagar","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2559885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tracheal intubation can be challenging, especially in unanticipated cases, where patient positioning plays a critical role. The bed-up-head-elevated (BUHE) position may improve intubation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This randomized non-inferiority trial included 90 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective surgery. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 underwent Macintosh laryngoscopy in the BUHE position followed by C-MAC laryngoscopy in the supine position, while Group 2 followed the reverse order. Endotracheal intubation was attempted with the second blade used for laryngoscopy. Laryngeal exposure was evaluated using Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) scores and Cormack - Lehane (CL) grading with a non-inferiority margin of -15% for POGO scores. Secondary outcomes included time required for intubation, attempts, adjuncts, effort, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BUHE Macintosh laryngoscopy yielded a mean POGO score of 50.5% compared to 63.4% with supine C-MAC laryngoscopy, with a mean difference of -12.9% (95% CI: -16.6% to -9.3%). CL grading favored C-MAC, while secondary outcomes showed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BUHE Macintosh laryngoscopy resulted in lower laryngeal exposure, as the confidence interval crossed the non-inferiority margin. However, secondary outcomes remained comparable. Further studies are required to validate these findings and refine non-inferiority margins.</p><p><strong>Trial registration-: </strong>CTRI/2023/02/050036.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1145-1152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of laryngeal exposure in bed-up-head-elevated Macintosh laryngoscopy vs. supine C-MAC video laryngoscopy: a randomized non-inferiority trial.\",\"authors\":\"Prashant Sirohiya, Hari Krishna Raju Sagiraju, Vasudha Ahuja, Nishkarsh Gupta, Vinod Kumar, Brajesh Kumar Ratre, Balbir Kumar, Saurabh Vig, Raghav Gupta, Shweta Bhopale, Anuja Pandit, Sushma Bhatnagar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2025.2559885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tracheal intubation can be challenging, especially in unanticipated cases, where patient positioning plays a critical role. The bed-up-head-elevated (BUHE) position may improve intubation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This randomized non-inferiority trial included 90 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective surgery. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 underwent Macintosh laryngoscopy in the BUHE position followed by C-MAC laryngoscopy in the supine position, while Group 2 followed the reverse order. Endotracheal intubation was attempted with the second blade used for laryngoscopy. Laryngeal exposure was evaluated using Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) scores and Cormack - Lehane (CL) grading with a non-inferiority margin of -15% for POGO scores. Secondary outcomes included time required for intubation, attempts, adjuncts, effort, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BUHE Macintosh laryngoscopy yielded a mean POGO score of 50.5% compared to 63.4% with supine C-MAC laryngoscopy, with a mean difference of -12.9% (95% CI: -16.6% to -9.3%). CL grading favored C-MAC, while secondary outcomes showed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BUHE Macintosh laryngoscopy resulted in lower laryngeal exposure, as the confidence interval crossed the non-inferiority margin. However, secondary outcomes remained comparable. Further studies are required to validate these findings and refine non-inferiority margins.</p><p><strong>Trial registration-: </strong>CTRI/2023/02/050036.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1145-1152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2559885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2559885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of laryngeal exposure in bed-up-head-elevated Macintosh laryngoscopy vs. supine C-MAC video laryngoscopy: a randomized non-inferiority trial.
Background: Tracheal intubation can be challenging, especially in unanticipated cases, where patient positioning plays a critical role. The bed-up-head-elevated (BUHE) position may improve intubation outcomes.
Research design and methods: This randomized non-inferiority trial included 90 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective surgery. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 underwent Macintosh laryngoscopy in the BUHE position followed by C-MAC laryngoscopy in the supine position, while Group 2 followed the reverse order. Endotracheal intubation was attempted with the second blade used for laryngoscopy. Laryngeal exposure was evaluated using Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) scores and Cormack - Lehane (CL) grading with a non-inferiority margin of -15% for POGO scores. Secondary outcomes included time required for intubation, attempts, adjuncts, effort, and complications.
Results: BUHE Macintosh laryngoscopy yielded a mean POGO score of 50.5% compared to 63.4% with supine C-MAC laryngoscopy, with a mean difference of -12.9% (95% CI: -16.6% to -9.3%). CL grading favored C-MAC, while secondary outcomes showed no significant differences.
Conclusion: BUHE Macintosh laryngoscopy resulted in lower laryngeal exposure, as the confidence interval crossed the non-inferiority margin. However, secondary outcomes remained comparable. Further studies are required to validate these findings and refine non-inferiority margins.