“治愈暴力”方法有效性的系统评价。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Charles Ransford, Monique Williams, Gary Slutkin
{"title":"“治愈暴力”方法有效性的系统评价。","authors":"Charles Ransford, Monique Williams, Gary Slutkin","doi":"10.1177/00469580251366142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Cure Violence approach applies public health epidemic control strategies to reduce violence in highly impacted communities and countries. This paper conducts a systematic review to identify studies analyzing the effectiveness of the Cure Violence approach and provides an overview of their findings. A protocol was developed using the PRISMA guidelines. For this study, we examined findings related only to shootings and killings because these are the outcomes to which the Cure Violence approach is applied. We utilized PubMed database, Google Scholar, and the Cure Violence Global organizational files to look for relevant studies. The review identified 13 papers analyzing 27 program sites and offering 83 findings on the impact of the approach on either shootings or killings. Overall, 68.7% of the findings indicated a reduction in shootings or killings, with 32.5% demonstrating statistically significant decreases. Findings varied geographically, with Baltimore accounting for the highest proportion of sites reporting either an increase in shootings or killings or non-significant results. Outside of Baltimore, 95.8% of sites demonstrated reductions in violence, with 54.2% achieving statistical significance. Notable findings include a 52% reduction in killings in Chicago, a 63% reduction in shootings in New York City, and a 74% reduction in killings in Cali, Colombia. The context surrounding the Baltimore findings underscores the importance of contextual factors in determining program effectiveness. Key components influencing program effectiveness include targeting individuals and groups at highest risk, employing credible messengers to reach individuals and groups at highest risk, real-time violence interruption and conflict mediation, sustained case management, structured monitoring systems with rapid response mechanisms, continuous monitoring of impact on shootings and killings, and sufficient, sustained financial investment. Recommendations to researchers are presented regarding the importance of including contextual factors in future research and understanding the importance of their role in guiding communities in improving the effectiveness of violence prevention programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251366142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of the Cure Violence Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Charles Ransford, Monique Williams, Gary Slutkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00469580251366142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Cure Violence approach applies public health epidemic control strategies to reduce violence in highly impacted communities and countries. This paper conducts a systematic review to identify studies analyzing the effectiveness of the Cure Violence approach and provides an overview of their findings. A protocol was developed using the PRISMA guidelines. For this study, we examined findings related only to shootings and killings because these are the outcomes to which the Cure Violence approach is applied. We utilized PubMed database, Google Scholar, and the Cure Violence Global organizational files to look for relevant studies. The review identified 13 papers analyzing 27 program sites and offering 83 findings on the impact of the approach on either shootings or killings. Overall, 68.7% of the findings indicated a reduction in shootings or killings, with 32.5% demonstrating statistically significant decreases. Findings varied geographically, with Baltimore accounting for the highest proportion of sites reporting either an increase in shootings or killings or non-significant results. Outside of Baltimore, 95.8% of sites demonstrated reductions in violence, with 54.2% achieving statistical significance. Notable findings include a 52% reduction in killings in Chicago, a 63% reduction in shootings in New York City, and a 74% reduction in killings in Cali, Colombia. The context surrounding the Baltimore findings underscores the importance of contextual factors in determining program effectiveness. Key components influencing program effectiveness include targeting individuals and groups at highest risk, employing credible messengers to reach individuals and groups at highest risk, real-time violence interruption and conflict mediation, sustained case management, structured monitoring systems with rapid response mechanisms, continuous monitoring of impact on shootings and killings, and sufficient, sustained financial investment. Recommendations to researchers are presented regarding the importance of including contextual factors in future research and understanding the importance of their role in guiding communities in improving the effectiveness of violence prevention programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"469580251366142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420962/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251366142\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251366142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“治愈暴力”方针适用公共卫生流行病控制战略,以减少受影响严重的社区和国家的暴力行为。本文进行了系统的回顾,以确定分析治疗暴力方法有效性的研究,并概述了他们的发现。根据PRISMA准则制定了一项协议。在这项研究中,我们只检查了与枪击和杀人有关的发现,因为这些是“治愈暴力”方法应用的结果。我们利用PubMed数据库、谷歌Scholar和Cure Violence Global组织文件寻找相关研究。该审查确定了13篇论文,分析了27个项目地点,并就该方法对枪击或杀戮的影响提供了83项发现。总体而言,68.7%的调查结果表明枪击或杀人事件有所减少,其中32.5%的调查结果显示有统计学意义上的显著下降。调查结果因地区而异,巴尔的摩在报告枪击或杀人事件增加或无显著结果的地区中所占比例最高。在巴尔的摩以外,95.8%的网站显示暴力减少,其中54.2%达到统计显著性。值得注意的发现包括芝加哥的杀人事件减少了52%,纽约市的枪击事件减少了63%,哥伦比亚卡利的杀人事件减少了74%。围绕巴尔的摩研究结果的背景强调了环境因素在决定项目有效性方面的重要性。影响方案有效性的关键组成部分包括:针对风险最高的个人和群体,雇用可靠的信使接触风险最高的个人和群体,实时中断暴力和调解冲突,持续的案件管理,具有快速反应机制的结构化监测系统,持续监测对枪击和杀戮的影响,以及充足、持续的财政投资。向研究人员提出的建议是关于在未来的研究中包括背景因素的重要性,以及了解他们在指导社区提高暴力预防计划有效性方面的作用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of the Cure Violence Approach.

A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of the Cure Violence Approach.

A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of the Cure Violence Approach.

A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of the Cure Violence Approach.

The Cure Violence approach applies public health epidemic control strategies to reduce violence in highly impacted communities and countries. This paper conducts a systematic review to identify studies analyzing the effectiveness of the Cure Violence approach and provides an overview of their findings. A protocol was developed using the PRISMA guidelines. For this study, we examined findings related only to shootings and killings because these are the outcomes to which the Cure Violence approach is applied. We utilized PubMed database, Google Scholar, and the Cure Violence Global organizational files to look for relevant studies. The review identified 13 papers analyzing 27 program sites and offering 83 findings on the impact of the approach on either shootings or killings. Overall, 68.7% of the findings indicated a reduction in shootings or killings, with 32.5% demonstrating statistically significant decreases. Findings varied geographically, with Baltimore accounting for the highest proportion of sites reporting either an increase in shootings or killings or non-significant results. Outside of Baltimore, 95.8% of sites demonstrated reductions in violence, with 54.2% achieving statistical significance. Notable findings include a 52% reduction in killings in Chicago, a 63% reduction in shootings in New York City, and a 74% reduction in killings in Cali, Colombia. The context surrounding the Baltimore findings underscores the importance of contextual factors in determining program effectiveness. Key components influencing program effectiveness include targeting individuals and groups at highest risk, employing credible messengers to reach individuals and groups at highest risk, real-time violence interruption and conflict mediation, sustained case management, structured monitoring systems with rapid response mechanisms, continuous monitoring of impact on shootings and killings, and sufficient, sustained financial investment. Recommendations to researchers are presented regarding the importance of including contextual factors in future research and understanding the importance of their role in guiding communities in improving the effectiveness of violence prevention programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信