静脉注射甲氨氨基酚治疗脊柱手术后急性疼痛:目标试验模拟。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Paul Potnuru, Adriana Baranov, Mohammad Khudirat, Alparslan Turan
{"title":"静脉注射甲氨氨基酚治疗脊柱手术后急性疼痛:目标试验模拟。","authors":"Paul Potnuru, Adriana Baranov, Mohammad Khudirat, Alparslan Turan","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-107010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skeletal muscle relaxants are often included in multimodal analgesic regimens following spine surgery, but their actual effectiveness remains unclear due to limited and inconsistent evidence. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous methocarbamol in reducing acute postoperative pain and opioid consumption after elective spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This emulated target trial used electronic health record data from patients undergoing elective spine surgery (posterior spinal fusion, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, laminectomy/laminotomy) between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2023. The exposure was intravenous methocarbamol (≥500 mg) administered within 2 hours postoperatively compared with usual care without methocarbamol. The primary outcome was the time-weighted average pain score in the 6-hour follow-up window after treatment assignment. The secondary outcome was cumulative opioid use measured in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) over the same period. We used 1:1 time-varying propensity score matching to adjust for confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The matched cohort included 1270 patients (median (IQR) age, 61 (50-68) years; 765 (60.2%) female). Administration of intravenous methocarbamol was not associated with significant reductions in postoperative pain scores (adjusted mean difference, 0.1; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.4) or opioid consumption (adjusted mean difference, 0.6 OME; 95% CI, -1.4 to 2.5) compared with controls. Sensitivity analyses generally confirmed primary results, except the marginal structural model indicated slightly increased pain scores in the methocarbamol group (adjusted mean difference, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.7), though this was not clinically meaningful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this emulated target trial of elective spine surgery, intravenous methocarbamol did not reduce acute postoperative pain or opioid consumption. These findings suggest a lack of analgesic benefit from intravenous methocarbamol use after spine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous methocarbamol for acute pain after spine surgery: a target trial emulation.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Potnuru, Adriana Baranov, Mohammad Khudirat, Alparslan Turan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2025-107010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skeletal muscle relaxants are often included in multimodal analgesic regimens following spine surgery, but their actual effectiveness remains unclear due to limited and inconsistent evidence. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous methocarbamol in reducing acute postoperative pain and opioid consumption after elective spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This emulated target trial used electronic health record data from patients undergoing elective spine surgery (posterior spinal fusion, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, laminectomy/laminotomy) between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2023. The exposure was intravenous methocarbamol (≥500 mg) administered within 2 hours postoperatively compared with usual care without methocarbamol. The primary outcome was the time-weighted average pain score in the 6-hour follow-up window after treatment assignment. The secondary outcome was cumulative opioid use measured in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) over the same period. We used 1:1 time-varying propensity score matching to adjust for confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The matched cohort included 1270 patients (median (IQR) age, 61 (50-68) years; 765 (60.2%) female). Administration of intravenous methocarbamol was not associated with significant reductions in postoperative pain scores (adjusted mean difference, 0.1; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.4) or opioid consumption (adjusted mean difference, 0.6 OME; 95% CI, -1.4 to 2.5) compared with controls. Sensitivity analyses generally confirmed primary results, except the marginal structural model indicated slightly increased pain scores in the methocarbamol group (adjusted mean difference, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.7), though this was not clinically meaningful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this emulated target trial of elective spine surgery, intravenous methocarbamol did not reduce acute postoperative pain or opioid consumption. These findings suggest a lack of analgesic benefit from intravenous methocarbamol use after spine surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-107010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-107010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨骼肌松弛剂常被纳入脊柱手术后的多模式镇痛方案中,但由于证据有限且不一致,其实际效果尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估静脉注射甲氨氨基酚在减少选择性脊柱手术后急性术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗方面的有效性。方法:这项模拟目标试验使用了2020年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间接受择期脊柱手术(后路脊柱融合术、前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合术、椎板切除术/椎板切开术)患者的电子健康记录数据。术后2小时内静脉注射甲氨氨基酚(≥500 mg),与不使用甲氨氨基酚的常规护理相比。主要终点是治疗分配后6小时随访窗口内的时间加权平均疼痛评分。次要结果是在同一时期内口服吗啡当量(OMEs)测量阿片类药物的累积使用。我们使用1:1时变倾向评分匹配来调整混淆。结果:匹配队列包括1270例患者(中位(IQR)年龄61(50-68)岁;765名(60.2%)女性)。与对照组相比,静脉注射甲氨氨基酚与术后疼痛评分(校正平均差值,0.1;95% CI, -0.1至0.4)或阿片类药物消耗(校正平均差值,0.6 OME; 95% CI, -1.4至2.5)的显著降低无关。敏感性分析一般证实了初步结果,除了边缘结构模型显示甲氨氨基酚组疼痛评分略有增加(校正平均差为0.5;95% CI为0.3至0.7),尽管这没有临床意义。结论:在这项选择性脊柱手术的模拟靶试验中,静脉注射甲氨氨基酚并没有减少术后急性疼痛或阿片类药物的消耗。这些发现表明脊柱手术后静脉注射甲氨氨基酚缺乏镇痛作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intravenous methocarbamol for acute pain after spine surgery: a target trial emulation.

Background: Skeletal muscle relaxants are often included in multimodal analgesic regimens following spine surgery, but their actual effectiveness remains unclear due to limited and inconsistent evidence. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous methocarbamol in reducing acute postoperative pain and opioid consumption after elective spine surgery.

Methods: This emulated target trial used electronic health record data from patients undergoing elective spine surgery (posterior spinal fusion, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, laminectomy/laminotomy) between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2023. The exposure was intravenous methocarbamol (≥500 mg) administered within 2 hours postoperatively compared with usual care without methocarbamol. The primary outcome was the time-weighted average pain score in the 6-hour follow-up window after treatment assignment. The secondary outcome was cumulative opioid use measured in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) over the same period. We used 1:1 time-varying propensity score matching to adjust for confounding.

Results: The matched cohort included 1270 patients (median (IQR) age, 61 (50-68) years; 765 (60.2%) female). Administration of intravenous methocarbamol was not associated with significant reductions in postoperative pain scores (adjusted mean difference, 0.1; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.4) or opioid consumption (adjusted mean difference, 0.6 OME; 95% CI, -1.4 to 2.5) compared with controls. Sensitivity analyses generally confirmed primary results, except the marginal structural model indicated slightly increased pain scores in the methocarbamol group (adjusted mean difference, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.7), though this was not clinically meaningful.

Conclusions: In this emulated target trial of elective spine surgery, intravenous methocarbamol did not reduce acute postoperative pain or opioid consumption. These findings suggest a lack of analgesic benefit from intravenous methocarbamol use after spine surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信