在参加共同发生疾病的强化门诊项目的人群中,使用康复住所的差异。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Bonnie Horgos, Michael Van Wert, Jennifer Wiseman, Jillian Wright, Emily Gus, Kristian Markon, Julie Rohovit
{"title":"在参加共同发生疾病的强化门诊项目的人群中,使用康复住所的差异。","authors":"Bonnie Horgos, Michael Van Wert, Jennifer Wiseman, Jillian Wright, Emily Gus, Kristian Markon, Julie Rohovit","doi":"10.1007/s11414-025-09970-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with mental health and substance use disorders (SUDs) experience worse outcomes, including increased mortality risk, compared to those with SUDs alone. Access to safe, stable housing, in conjunction with treatment, such as intensive outpatient programs (IOP), is vital in early recovery. Nevertheless, those with historically marginalized identities may experience increased disparities in accessing and utilizing services. The aim of this study was to examine disparities in the utilization of recovery residences among adults receiving treatment for mental health disorders and SUDs in an IOP. Participants (n = 2803) were recruited as part of an ongoing program evaluation at a large Midwestern treatment agency offering to cover some of the monthly cost of living in independently operated recovery residences while admitted to the IOP. Collected data included demographic information and outcome variables. Logistic regression models examined factors associated with recovery residence enrollment. Most participants (80.5%, n = 2258) lived in a recovery residence during IOP. People who were female, Black-only, multiracial, had less education, or a legal history were less likely to live in recovery residences. Those with a prior treatment history, recently unhoused, or with more days abstinent from substances were more likely to live in recovery residences. In short, even with reduced cost barriers, disparities persist in the utilization of recovery residences in conjunction with IOPs, particularly those from historically marginalized groups. Future research should prioritize understanding this utilization gap and developing effective strategies to support individuals in utilizing recovery residences alongside IOP for improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Utilization of Recovery Residences among People Attending an Intensive Outpatient Program for Co-occurring Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Bonnie Horgos, Michael Van Wert, Jennifer Wiseman, Jillian Wright, Emily Gus, Kristian Markon, Julie Rohovit\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11414-025-09970-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>People with mental health and substance use disorders (SUDs) experience worse outcomes, including increased mortality risk, compared to those with SUDs alone. Access to safe, stable housing, in conjunction with treatment, such as intensive outpatient programs (IOP), is vital in early recovery. Nevertheless, those with historically marginalized identities may experience increased disparities in accessing and utilizing services. The aim of this study was to examine disparities in the utilization of recovery residences among adults receiving treatment for mental health disorders and SUDs in an IOP. Participants (n = 2803) were recruited as part of an ongoing program evaluation at a large Midwestern treatment agency offering to cover some of the monthly cost of living in independently operated recovery residences while admitted to the IOP. Collected data included demographic information and outcome variables. Logistic regression models examined factors associated with recovery residence enrollment. Most participants (80.5%, n = 2258) lived in a recovery residence during IOP. People who were female, Black-only, multiracial, had less education, or a legal history were less likely to live in recovery residences. Those with a prior treatment history, recently unhoused, or with more days abstinent from substances were more likely to live in recovery residences. In short, even with reduced cost barriers, disparities persist in the utilization of recovery residences in conjunction with IOPs, particularly those from historically marginalized groups. Future research should prioritize understanding this utilization gap and developing effective strategies to support individuals in utilizing recovery residences alongside IOP for improved outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09970-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09970-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与单独患有精神健康和物质使用障碍(sud)的人相比,患有精神健康和物质使用障碍(sud)的人会经历更糟糕的结果,包括死亡风险增加。获得安全、稳定的住房,并配合强化门诊项目(IOP)等治疗,对早期康复至关重要。然而,那些历史上被边缘化的人在获取和利用服务方面可能会遇到更大的差距。本研究的目的是检查在IOP中接受精神健康障碍和SUDs治疗的成年人使用康复住所的差异。参与者(n = 2803)被招募,作为中西部一家大型治疗机构正在进行的项目评估的一部分,该机构提供在IOP入院期间,在独立经营的康复住宅中支付一些每月的生活费用。收集的数据包括人口统计信息和结果变量。Logistic回归模型检验了与康复住院登记相关的因素。大多数参与者(80.5%,n = 2258)在IOP期间住在康复住所。女性、纯黑人、多种族、受教育程度较低或有法律史的人住进康复中心的可能性较小。那些有治疗史的人,最近无家可归的人,或者戒药时间较长的人更有可能住在康复院。简而言之,即使降低了成本障碍,在与IOPs结合使用恢复住宅方面仍然存在差异,特别是那些历史上被边缘化的群体。未来的研究应优先理解这种利用差距,并制定有效的策略,以支持个人利用康复住所和IOP改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in Utilization of Recovery Residences among People Attending an Intensive Outpatient Program for Co-occurring Disorders.

People with mental health and substance use disorders (SUDs) experience worse outcomes, including increased mortality risk, compared to those with SUDs alone. Access to safe, stable housing, in conjunction with treatment, such as intensive outpatient programs (IOP), is vital in early recovery. Nevertheless, those with historically marginalized identities may experience increased disparities in accessing and utilizing services. The aim of this study was to examine disparities in the utilization of recovery residences among adults receiving treatment for mental health disorders and SUDs in an IOP. Participants (n = 2803) were recruited as part of an ongoing program evaluation at a large Midwestern treatment agency offering to cover some of the monthly cost of living in independently operated recovery residences while admitted to the IOP. Collected data included demographic information and outcome variables. Logistic regression models examined factors associated with recovery residence enrollment. Most participants (80.5%, n = 2258) lived in a recovery residence during IOP. People who were female, Black-only, multiracial, had less education, or a legal history were less likely to live in recovery residences. Those with a prior treatment history, recently unhoused, or with more days abstinent from substances were more likely to live in recovery residences. In short, even with reduced cost barriers, disparities persist in the utilization of recovery residences in conjunction with IOPs, particularly those from historically marginalized groups. Future research should prioritize understanding this utilization gap and developing effective strategies to support individuals in utilizing recovery residences alongside IOP for improved outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews. This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信