Bonnie Horgos, Michael Van Wert, Jennifer Wiseman, Jillian Wright, Emily Gus, Kristian Markon, Julie Rohovit
{"title":"在参加共同发生疾病的强化门诊项目的人群中,使用康复住所的差异。","authors":"Bonnie Horgos, Michael Van Wert, Jennifer Wiseman, Jillian Wright, Emily Gus, Kristian Markon, Julie Rohovit","doi":"10.1007/s11414-025-09970-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with mental health and substance use disorders (SUDs) experience worse outcomes, including increased mortality risk, compared to those with SUDs alone. Access to safe, stable housing, in conjunction with treatment, such as intensive outpatient programs (IOP), is vital in early recovery. Nevertheless, those with historically marginalized identities may experience increased disparities in accessing and utilizing services. The aim of this study was to examine disparities in the utilization of recovery residences among adults receiving treatment for mental health disorders and SUDs in an IOP. Participants (n = 2803) were recruited as part of an ongoing program evaluation at a large Midwestern treatment agency offering to cover some of the monthly cost of living in independently operated recovery residences while admitted to the IOP. Collected data included demographic information and outcome variables. Logistic regression models examined factors associated with recovery residence enrollment. Most participants (80.5%, n = 2258) lived in a recovery residence during IOP. People who were female, Black-only, multiracial, had less education, or a legal history were less likely to live in recovery residences. Those with a prior treatment history, recently unhoused, or with more days abstinent from substances were more likely to live in recovery residences. In short, even with reduced cost barriers, disparities persist in the utilization of recovery residences in conjunction with IOPs, particularly those from historically marginalized groups. Future research should prioritize understanding this utilization gap and developing effective strategies to support individuals in utilizing recovery residences alongside IOP for improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Utilization of Recovery Residences among People Attending an Intensive Outpatient Program for Co-occurring Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Bonnie Horgos, Michael Van Wert, Jennifer Wiseman, Jillian Wright, Emily Gus, Kristian Markon, Julie Rohovit\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11414-025-09970-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>People with mental health and substance use disorders (SUDs) experience worse outcomes, including increased mortality risk, compared to those with SUDs alone. Access to safe, stable housing, in conjunction with treatment, such as intensive outpatient programs (IOP), is vital in early recovery. Nevertheless, those with historically marginalized identities may experience increased disparities in accessing and utilizing services. The aim of this study was to examine disparities in the utilization of recovery residences among adults receiving treatment for mental health disorders and SUDs in an IOP. Participants (n = 2803) were recruited as part of an ongoing program evaluation at a large Midwestern treatment agency offering to cover some of the monthly cost of living in independently operated recovery residences while admitted to the IOP. Collected data included demographic information and outcome variables. Logistic regression models examined factors associated with recovery residence enrollment. Most participants (80.5%, n = 2258) lived in a recovery residence during IOP. People who were female, Black-only, multiracial, had less education, or a legal history were less likely to live in recovery residences. Those with a prior treatment history, recently unhoused, or with more days abstinent from substances were more likely to live in recovery residences. In short, even with reduced cost barriers, disparities persist in the utilization of recovery residences in conjunction with IOPs, particularly those from historically marginalized groups. Future research should prioritize understanding this utilization gap and developing effective strategies to support individuals in utilizing recovery residences alongside IOP for improved outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09970-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09970-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disparities in Utilization of Recovery Residences among People Attending an Intensive Outpatient Program for Co-occurring Disorders.
People with mental health and substance use disorders (SUDs) experience worse outcomes, including increased mortality risk, compared to those with SUDs alone. Access to safe, stable housing, in conjunction with treatment, such as intensive outpatient programs (IOP), is vital in early recovery. Nevertheless, those with historically marginalized identities may experience increased disparities in accessing and utilizing services. The aim of this study was to examine disparities in the utilization of recovery residences among adults receiving treatment for mental health disorders and SUDs in an IOP. Participants (n = 2803) were recruited as part of an ongoing program evaluation at a large Midwestern treatment agency offering to cover some of the monthly cost of living in independently operated recovery residences while admitted to the IOP. Collected data included demographic information and outcome variables. Logistic regression models examined factors associated with recovery residence enrollment. Most participants (80.5%, n = 2258) lived in a recovery residence during IOP. People who were female, Black-only, multiracial, had less education, or a legal history were less likely to live in recovery residences. Those with a prior treatment history, recently unhoused, or with more days abstinent from substances were more likely to live in recovery residences. In short, even with reduced cost barriers, disparities persist in the utilization of recovery residences in conjunction with IOPs, particularly those from historically marginalized groups. Future research should prioritize understanding this utilization gap and developing effective strategies to support individuals in utilizing recovery residences alongside IOP for improved outcomes.
期刊介绍:
This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews.
This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.