心理健康研究中共同设计的范围审查:基本要素和建议。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Helena Roennfeldt, Victoria Stewart, Marianne Wyder, Teresa Fawcett, Caroline Robertson, Rebecca Soole, Dan Siskind, Amanda Wheeler, Justin Chapman
{"title":"心理健康研究中共同设计的范围审查:基本要素和建议。","authors":"Helena Roennfeldt, Victoria Stewart, Marianne Wyder, Teresa Fawcett, Caroline Robertson, Rebecca Soole, Dan Siskind, Amanda Wheeler, Justin Chapman","doi":"10.1177/15394492251367259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Co-design is increasingly being adopted within mental health service design and delivery, but is less common in research. Co-design ensures that research is relevant and benefits people accessing services. This review examined frameworks, models, and/or guidelines for co-designing mental health research, asking: (a) How is co-design defined? (b) What are the elements, values, and design tools? (c) What recommendations are proposed? A scoping review of peer-reviewed and gray literature on co-design in mental health research was undertaken and narratively synthesized. A total of 28 studies were included, showing varied understandings of co-design. Key values included social justice, recognizing lived experience as expertise, and fostering safe and trusting relationships. Traditional academic structures often hinder co-design; however, innovative research methods have shown potential. Recommendations and strategies to overcome barriers are provided. To enhance the adoption of co-design in mental health research, clearer terminology and agreed-upon values and processes are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47195,"journal":{"name":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","volume":" ","pages":"15394492251367259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoping Review of Co-Design in Mental Health Research: Essential Elements and Recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Helena Roennfeldt, Victoria Stewart, Marianne Wyder, Teresa Fawcett, Caroline Robertson, Rebecca Soole, Dan Siskind, Amanda Wheeler, Justin Chapman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15394492251367259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Co-design is increasingly being adopted within mental health service design and delivery, but is less common in research. Co-design ensures that research is relevant and benefits people accessing services. This review examined frameworks, models, and/or guidelines for co-designing mental health research, asking: (a) How is co-design defined? (b) What are the elements, values, and design tools? (c) What recommendations are proposed? A scoping review of peer-reviewed and gray literature on co-design in mental health research was undertaken and narratively synthesized. A total of 28 studies were included, showing varied understandings of co-design. Key values included social justice, recognizing lived experience as expertise, and fostering safe and trusting relationships. Traditional academic structures often hinder co-design; however, innovative research methods have shown potential. Recommendations and strategies to overcome barriers are provided. To enhance the adoption of co-design in mental health research, clearer terminology and agreed-upon values and processes are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15394492251367259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492251367259\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492251367259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

协同设计在精神卫生服务设计和提供中越来越多地被采用,但在研究中却不太常见。共同设计确保了研究的相关性,并使获得服务的人受益。本综述审查了共同设计心理健康研究的框架、模型和/或指南,并提出以下问题:(a)如何定义共同设计?(b)元素、价值和设计工具是什么?(c)提出了什么建议?对心理健康研究中共同设计的同行评议文献和灰色文献进行了范围审查,并进行了叙述性综合。共纳入了28项研究,显示了对共同设计的不同理解。关键价值观包括社会公正、将生活经验视为专业知识、培养安全和信任的关系。传统的学术结构常常阻碍协同设计;然而,创新的研究方法已经显示出潜力。提出了克服障碍的建议和战略。为了加强在精神卫生研究中采用共同设计,需要更明确的术语和商定的价值观和程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scoping Review of Co-Design in Mental Health Research: Essential Elements and Recommendations.

Co-design is increasingly being adopted within mental health service design and delivery, but is less common in research. Co-design ensures that research is relevant and benefits people accessing services. This review examined frameworks, models, and/or guidelines for co-designing mental health research, asking: (a) How is co-design defined? (b) What are the elements, values, and design tools? (c) What recommendations are proposed? A scoping review of peer-reviewed and gray literature on co-design in mental health research was undertaken and narratively synthesized. A total of 28 studies were included, showing varied understandings of co-design. Key values included social justice, recognizing lived experience as expertise, and fostering safe and trusting relationships. Traditional academic structures often hinder co-design; however, innovative research methods have shown potential. Recommendations and strategies to overcome barriers are provided. To enhance the adoption of co-design in mental health research, clearer terminology and agreed-upon values and processes are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The aim of OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health is to advance knowledge and science in occupational therapy and related fields, nationally and internationally, through the publication of scholarly literature and research. The journal publishes research that advances the understanding of occupation as it relates to participation and health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信