Maud M R McCutcheon, John D Allison, Stella R G Smith
{"title":"到达医院方式对穿透性创伤成人早期死亡率的影响:系统回顾、meta分析和叙事综合","authors":"Maud M R McCutcheon, John D Allison, Stella R G Smith","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Penetrating injury is a time-critical disease where early definitive treatment is lifesaving. Although most patients with penetrating trauma reach the emergency department (ED) via emergency medical services (EMS), self-presentation or transport with police are also common. This review synthesizes the available evidence in adult penetrating trauma to evaluate if the mode of transport to hospital impacts early mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two groups were defined as follows: transport to hospital with emergency medical services (EMS) and 'other' transport (private or police). Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched as well as gray literature. Results were screened by two authors. Eligible studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias and included in both a meta-analysis using a random effects calculation of odds ratio and narrative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>19 studies were included overall. Meta-analysis using data from nine studies showed EMS transport did not significantly impact early mortality (OR 1.32 [95% CI 0.70-2.48] (p = 0.39)). Overall injury-severity adjusted mortality was assessed using data from 14 studies and was also not significantly affected by EMS transport (OR 1.21 [95% CI 0.93-1.59] (p = 0.16)). Data comparing injury-to-hospital arrival times for medical and nonmedical transport were limited but suggested nonmedical transport was faster amongst an urban cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no survival benefit associated with EMS transport among this largely USA-based urban cohort of patients with penetrating trauma. Shorter injury-to-hospital arrival times associated with nonmedical transport may, in some cases, outweigh the benefits of prehospital care. These findings support an emphasis on shortening the prehospital phase for severely injured penetrating trauma patients, which may include use of nonmedical transport where transport times are short.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2959-2967"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Mode of Arrival to Hospital on Early Mortality in Adults With Penetrating Trauma: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Narrative Synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Maud M R McCutcheon, John D Allison, Stella R G Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjs.70087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Penetrating injury is a time-critical disease where early definitive treatment is lifesaving. Although most patients with penetrating trauma reach the emergency department (ED) via emergency medical services (EMS), self-presentation or transport with police are also common. This review synthesizes the available evidence in adult penetrating trauma to evaluate if the mode of transport to hospital impacts early mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two groups were defined as follows: transport to hospital with emergency medical services (EMS) and 'other' transport (private or police). Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched as well as gray literature. Results were screened by two authors. Eligible studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias and included in both a meta-analysis using a random effects calculation of odds ratio and narrative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>19 studies were included overall. Meta-analysis using data from nine studies showed EMS transport did not significantly impact early mortality (OR 1.32 [95% CI 0.70-2.48] (p = 0.39)). Overall injury-severity adjusted mortality was assessed using data from 14 studies and was also not significantly affected by EMS transport (OR 1.21 [95% CI 0.93-1.59] (p = 0.16)). Data comparing injury-to-hospital arrival times for medical and nonmedical transport were limited but suggested nonmedical transport was faster amongst an urban cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no survival benefit associated with EMS transport among this largely USA-based urban cohort of patients with penetrating trauma. Shorter injury-to-hospital arrival times associated with nonmedical transport may, in some cases, outweigh the benefits of prehospital care. These findings support an emphasis on shortening the prehospital phase for severely injured penetrating trauma patients, which may include use of nonmedical transport where transport times are short.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2959-2967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70087\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:穿透性损伤是一种时间紧迫的疾病,早期的明确治疗可以挽救生命。虽然大多数穿透性创伤患者通过紧急医疗服务(EMS)到达急诊科(ED),但自我陈述或与警察一起转移也很常见。本综述综合了成人穿透性创伤的现有证据,以评估送往医院的方式是否会影响早期死亡率。方法:两组定义如下:送往医院的紧急医疗服务(EMS)和“其他”运输(私人或警察)。检索Medline、Embase和CENTRAL数据库以及灰色文献。结果由两位作者筛选。对符合条件的研究进行质量和偏倚风险评估,并纳入使用优势比随机效应计算和叙事分析的荟萃分析。结果:共纳入19项研究。使用9项研究数据的荟萃分析显示,EMS转运对早期死亡率没有显著影响(OR 1.32 [95% CI 0.70-2.48] (p = 0.39))。使用来自14项研究的数据评估总体损伤严重程度调整死亡率,EMS运输也没有显著影响(OR 1.21 [95% CI 0.93-1.59] (p = 0.16))。比较受伤到医院的医疗和非医疗运输时间的数据有限,但表明非医疗运输在城市队列患者中更快。结论:在美国大部分城市穿透性创伤患者中,EMS转运没有相关的生存益处。在某些情况下,与非医疗运输相关的较短伤情到达医院的时间可能超过院前护理的好处。这些发现支持强调缩短严重穿透性创伤患者院前阶段,这可能包括在运输时间短的情况下使用非医疗运输。
Impact of Mode of Arrival to Hospital on Early Mortality in Adults With Penetrating Trauma: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Narrative Synthesis.
Background: Penetrating injury is a time-critical disease where early definitive treatment is lifesaving. Although most patients with penetrating trauma reach the emergency department (ED) via emergency medical services (EMS), self-presentation or transport with police are also common. This review synthesizes the available evidence in adult penetrating trauma to evaluate if the mode of transport to hospital impacts early mortality.
Methods: Two groups were defined as follows: transport to hospital with emergency medical services (EMS) and 'other' transport (private or police). Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched as well as gray literature. Results were screened by two authors. Eligible studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias and included in both a meta-analysis using a random effects calculation of odds ratio and narrative analysis.
Results: 19 studies were included overall. Meta-analysis using data from nine studies showed EMS transport did not significantly impact early mortality (OR 1.32 [95% CI 0.70-2.48] (p = 0.39)). Overall injury-severity adjusted mortality was assessed using data from 14 studies and was also not significantly affected by EMS transport (OR 1.21 [95% CI 0.93-1.59] (p = 0.16)). Data comparing injury-to-hospital arrival times for medical and nonmedical transport were limited but suggested nonmedical transport was faster amongst an urban cohort of patients.
Conclusions: There was no survival benefit associated with EMS transport among this largely USA-based urban cohort of patients with penetrating trauma. Shorter injury-to-hospital arrival times associated with nonmedical transport may, in some cases, outweigh the benefits of prehospital care. These findings support an emphasis on shortening the prehospital phase for severely injured penetrating trauma patients, which may include use of nonmedical transport where transport times are short.
期刊介绍:
World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.