自体移植物在肝胆胰手术中的静脉血管重建:单中心经验。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
World Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1002/wjs.70083
Taiga Fujii, Atsushi Takahashi, Mamiko Miyashita, Shoichi Irie, Yoshinori Takeda, Hirofumi Ichida, Ryuji Yoshioka, Yoshihiro Mise, Yoshihito Kotera, Akio Saiura
{"title":"自体移植物在肝胆胰手术中的静脉血管重建:单中心经验。","authors":"Taiga Fujii, Atsushi Takahashi, Mamiko Miyashita, Shoichi Irie, Yoshinori Takeda, Hirofumi Ichida, Ryuji Yoshioka, Yoshihiro Mise, Yoshihito Kotera, Akio Saiura","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achieving R0 resection in hepatopancreatobiliary (HBP) surgery frequently necessitates venous resection and reconstruction. Autologous grafts offer a promising solution, particularly in complex resections where infection risk or graft availability limit the use of synthetic or donor grafts. However, clinical data on the outcomes of autologous venous grafts remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of autologous grafts in venous reconstruction during HBP surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 34 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic vein (HV), inferior vena cava (IVC), or portal vein (PV) reconstruction using autologous grafts between January 2019 and November 2024. Graft materials included peritoneum, saphenous vein, renal vein, and round ligament, selected at the surgeon's discretion. Reconstruction techniques were classified as patch or tubular. The primary outcomes were graft patency, perioperative complications, and graft-related morbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 34 patients, HV, IVC, and PV reconstructions were performed in 52.9%, 23.5%, and 23.5%, respectively. The most commonly used grafts were peritoneum (41.1%) and saphenous vein (23.5%). Patch and tubular reconstructions accounted for 58.9% and 41.1% of cases, respectively. Major postoperative complications (≥ Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa) occurred in 20.5% of patients. Graft-related complications, including thrombosis, were observed in 8.8%. The estimated 3-year patency rate was 91.2%. No graft-related mortality was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Autologous grafts provide a safe and effective option for venous reconstruction in HBP surgery, offering high patency and low complication rates. These findings support the use of autologous grafts as a flexible and reliable technique in complex HBP cases. Further multicenter studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are necessary to validate these outcomes and refine graft selection criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2873-2879"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autologous Graft for Venous Vascular Reconstruction in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery: A Single Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Taiga Fujii, Atsushi Takahashi, Mamiko Miyashita, Shoichi Irie, Yoshinori Takeda, Hirofumi Ichida, Ryuji Yoshioka, Yoshihiro Mise, Yoshihito Kotera, Akio Saiura\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjs.70083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achieving R0 resection in hepatopancreatobiliary (HBP) surgery frequently necessitates venous resection and reconstruction. Autologous grafts offer a promising solution, particularly in complex resections where infection risk or graft availability limit the use of synthetic or donor grafts. However, clinical data on the outcomes of autologous venous grafts remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of autologous grafts in venous reconstruction during HBP surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 34 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic vein (HV), inferior vena cava (IVC), or portal vein (PV) reconstruction using autologous grafts between January 2019 and November 2024. Graft materials included peritoneum, saphenous vein, renal vein, and round ligament, selected at the surgeon's discretion. Reconstruction techniques were classified as patch or tubular. The primary outcomes were graft patency, perioperative complications, and graft-related morbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 34 patients, HV, IVC, and PV reconstructions were performed in 52.9%, 23.5%, and 23.5%, respectively. The most commonly used grafts were peritoneum (41.1%) and saphenous vein (23.5%). Patch and tubular reconstructions accounted for 58.9% and 41.1% of cases, respectively. Major postoperative complications (≥ Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa) occurred in 20.5% of patients. Graft-related complications, including thrombosis, were observed in 8.8%. The estimated 3-year patency rate was 91.2%. No graft-related mortality was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Autologous grafts provide a safe and effective option for venous reconstruction in HBP surgery, offering high patency and low complication rates. These findings support the use of autologous grafts as a flexible and reliable technique in complex HBP cases. Further multicenter studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are necessary to validate these outcomes and refine graft selection criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2873-2879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在肝胆胰(HBP)手术中实现R0切除通常需要静脉切除和重建。自体移植物提供了一个有希望的解决方案,特别是在感染风险或移植物可用性限制使用合成或供体移植物的复杂切除中。然而,关于自体静脉移植结果的临床数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评价自体移植物在高血压手术中静脉重建的安全性和可行性。方法:我们回顾性分析了2019年1月至2024年11月期间连续34例采用自体移植物重建肝静脉(HV)、下腔静脉(IVC)或门静脉(PV)的患者。移植材料包括腹膜、隐静脉、肾静脉和圆形韧带,由外科医生自行选择。重建技术分为贴片和管状两种。主要结果是移植物通畅、围手术期并发症和移植物相关发病率。结果:34例患者中,HV、IVC和PV重建的比例分别为52.9%、23.5%和23.5%。最常用的移植物是腹膜(41.1%)和隐静脉(23.5%)。补片重建和管状重建分别占58.9%和41.1%。术后主要并发症(≥Clavien-Dindo分级IIIa)发生率为20.5%。8.8%的患者出现移植物相关并发症,包括血栓形成。估计3年通畅率为91.2%。未观察到移植物相关死亡。结论:自体移植物为高血压手术静脉重建提供了安全有效的选择,具有高通畅性和低并发症的特点。这些发现支持自体移植物作为一种灵活可靠的技术用于复杂的高血压病例。进一步的多中心研究需要更大的队列和更长时间的随访来验证这些结果并完善移植物选择标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autologous Graft for Venous Vascular Reconstruction in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery: A Single Center Experience.

Background: Achieving R0 resection in hepatopancreatobiliary (HBP) surgery frequently necessitates venous resection and reconstruction. Autologous grafts offer a promising solution, particularly in complex resections where infection risk or graft availability limit the use of synthetic or donor grafts. However, clinical data on the outcomes of autologous venous grafts remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of autologous grafts in venous reconstruction during HBP surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 34 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic vein (HV), inferior vena cava (IVC), or portal vein (PV) reconstruction using autologous grafts between January 2019 and November 2024. Graft materials included peritoneum, saphenous vein, renal vein, and round ligament, selected at the surgeon's discretion. Reconstruction techniques were classified as patch or tubular. The primary outcomes were graft patency, perioperative complications, and graft-related morbidity.

Results: Among the 34 patients, HV, IVC, and PV reconstructions were performed in 52.9%, 23.5%, and 23.5%, respectively. The most commonly used grafts were peritoneum (41.1%) and saphenous vein (23.5%). Patch and tubular reconstructions accounted for 58.9% and 41.1% of cases, respectively. Major postoperative complications (≥ Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa) occurred in 20.5% of patients. Graft-related complications, including thrombosis, were observed in 8.8%. The estimated 3-year patency rate was 91.2%. No graft-related mortality was observed.

Conclusions: Autologous grafts provide a safe and effective option for venous reconstruction in HBP surgery, offering high patency and low complication rates. These findings support the use of autologous grafts as a flexible and reliable technique in complex HBP cases. Further multicenter studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are necessary to validate these outcomes and refine graft selection criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信