研究人员指南的临床前动物模型的急性四肢筋膜室综合征。

IF 2.2 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2025-001754
Catharina Constanze Gaeth, Robert Joseph Moritz, Max Seidelmann, Daniel Joseph Cognetti
{"title":"研究人员指南的临床前动物模型的急性四肢筋膜室综合征。","authors":"Catharina Constanze Gaeth, Robert Joseph Moritz, Max Seidelmann, Daniel Joseph Cognetti","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute extremity compartment syndrome (CS) is a serious medical complication triggered by factors such as trauma, vascular injury, or prolonged compression, resulting in elevated intracompartmental pressure (ICP) and tissue ischemia. Diagnosis remains challenging, mainly relying on the subjective evaluation of clinical symptoms. Different animal models have been used to study pathophysiology and evaluate diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The aim of this review is to summarize and compare different animal CS models to provide insight for the development of more authentic and clinically relevant CS model. A comprehensive search of two databases was conducted. English-language animal studies focusing on CS were included. Human studies, non-acute extremity CS, and review papers were excluded. Data extraction and analysis focused on animal species, CS models, and clinically relevant assessment methods of CS. After screening, 90 studies met the inclusion criteria. Small animal (n=36, 40%) and canine models (n=31, 34.4%) were the most used animal species. A fluid infusion model (n=48, 53.3%) was the predominant induction method, followed by the ischemia-reperfusion (n=29, 32.2%) and the internal/external mechanical pressure models. Five studies used a combination CS model to achieve a more comprehensive representation of the clinical pathophysiology. Various diagnostic modalities were employed; ICP measurement (n=74, 82.2%) and evaluation of tissue oxygenation (n=10, 11.1%) were the most frequent device-based assessments. Biomarkers assessing muscle cell damage (n=15, 16.7%), antioxidant status (n=18, 20%) and inflammation (n=16, 17.8%) were analyzed as well as physical examination (n=12, 13.3%) and neuromuscular testing (n=10, 11.1%). There are a variety of validated animal species models, which can be considered depending on the research objectives. This review helps researchers evaluate model strengths and drawbacks before deciding on an experimental design.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 Suppl 5","pages":"e001754"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Researcher's guide to preclinical animal models of acute extremity compartment syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Catharina Constanze Gaeth, Robert Joseph Moritz, Max Seidelmann, Daniel Joseph Cognetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acute extremity compartment syndrome (CS) is a serious medical complication triggered by factors such as trauma, vascular injury, or prolonged compression, resulting in elevated intracompartmental pressure (ICP) and tissue ischemia. Diagnosis remains challenging, mainly relying on the subjective evaluation of clinical symptoms. Different animal models have been used to study pathophysiology and evaluate diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The aim of this review is to summarize and compare different animal CS models to provide insight for the development of more authentic and clinically relevant CS model. A comprehensive search of two databases was conducted. English-language animal studies focusing on CS were included. Human studies, non-acute extremity CS, and review papers were excluded. Data extraction and analysis focused on animal species, CS models, and clinically relevant assessment methods of CS. After screening, 90 studies met the inclusion criteria. Small animal (n=36, 40%) and canine models (n=31, 34.4%) were the most used animal species. A fluid infusion model (n=48, 53.3%) was the predominant induction method, followed by the ischemia-reperfusion (n=29, 32.2%) and the internal/external mechanical pressure models. Five studies used a combination CS model to achieve a more comprehensive representation of the clinical pathophysiology. Various diagnostic modalities were employed; ICP measurement (n=74, 82.2%) and evaluation of tissue oxygenation (n=10, 11.1%) were the most frequent device-based assessments. Biomarkers assessing muscle cell damage (n=15, 16.7%), antioxidant status (n=18, 20%) and inflammation (n=16, 17.8%) were analyzed as well as physical examination (n=12, 13.3%) and neuromuscular testing (n=10, 11.1%). There are a variety of validated animal species models, which can be considered depending on the research objectives. This review helps researchers evaluate model strengths and drawbacks before deciding on an experimental design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open\",\"volume\":\"10 Suppl 5\",\"pages\":\"e001754\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414187/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-001754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-001754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性肢间室综合征(Acute extremity ventricular syndrome, CS)是一种严重的医学并发症,由创伤、血管损伤或长时间压迫等因素引发,导致室内压升高和组织缺血。诊断仍然具有挑战性,主要依赖于对临床症状的主观评价。不同的动物模型已被用于研究病理生理学和评估诊断和治疗方法。本文综述的目的是总结和比较不同的动物CS模型,为开发更真实和临床相关的CS模型提供参考。对两个数据库进行了全面检索。包括以CS为重点的英语动物研究。排除了人体研究、非急性肢体CS和综述论文。数据提取与分析主要集中在动物种类、CS模型、CS临床相关评估方法等方面。筛选后,90项研究符合纳入标准。小动物模型(n=36, 40%)和犬模型(n=31, 34.4%)是使用最多的动物种类。液体输注模型(n=48, 53.3%)是主要的诱导方法,其次是缺血再灌注模型(n=29, 32.2%)和内外机械压力模型。5项研究采用联合CS模型,更全面地反映了临床病理生理。采用了各种诊断方式;ICP测量(n=74, 82.2%)和组织氧合评估(n=10, 11.1%)是最常见的基于设备的评估。分析评估肌肉细胞损伤(n=15, 16.7%)、抗氧化状态(n=18, 20%)和炎症(n=16, 17.8%)的生物标志物,以及体格检查(n=12, 13.3%)和神经肌肉测试(n=10, 11.1%)。有多种经过验证的动物物种模型,可以根据研究目标来考虑。这篇综述有助于研究人员在决定实验设计之前评估模型的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Researcher's guide to preclinical animal models of acute extremity compartment syndrome.

Researcher's guide to preclinical animal models of acute extremity compartment syndrome.

Researcher's guide to preclinical animal models of acute extremity compartment syndrome.

Acute extremity compartment syndrome (CS) is a serious medical complication triggered by factors such as trauma, vascular injury, or prolonged compression, resulting in elevated intracompartmental pressure (ICP) and tissue ischemia. Diagnosis remains challenging, mainly relying on the subjective evaluation of clinical symptoms. Different animal models have been used to study pathophysiology and evaluate diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The aim of this review is to summarize and compare different animal CS models to provide insight for the development of more authentic and clinically relevant CS model. A comprehensive search of two databases was conducted. English-language animal studies focusing on CS were included. Human studies, non-acute extremity CS, and review papers were excluded. Data extraction and analysis focused on animal species, CS models, and clinically relevant assessment methods of CS. After screening, 90 studies met the inclusion criteria. Small animal (n=36, 40%) and canine models (n=31, 34.4%) were the most used animal species. A fluid infusion model (n=48, 53.3%) was the predominant induction method, followed by the ischemia-reperfusion (n=29, 32.2%) and the internal/external mechanical pressure models. Five studies used a combination CS model to achieve a more comprehensive representation of the clinical pathophysiology. Various diagnostic modalities were employed; ICP measurement (n=74, 82.2%) and evaluation of tissue oxygenation (n=10, 11.1%) were the most frequent device-based assessments. Biomarkers assessing muscle cell damage (n=15, 16.7%), antioxidant status (n=18, 20%) and inflammation (n=16, 17.8%) were analyzed as well as physical examination (n=12, 13.3%) and neuromuscular testing (n=10, 11.1%). There are a variety of validated animal species models, which can be considered depending on the research objectives. This review helps researchers evaluate model strengths and drawbacks before deciding on an experimental design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信