儿科危重医学教育与专业发展:标准化课程、培训与评估:神经危重护理可信赖的专业活动。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Andrew E Becker, Nicholas S Abend, Giulia M Benedetti, Sandra D W Buttram, Melissa G Chung, Jennifer C Erklauer, Stuart H Friess, Sue J Hong, Jimmy Huh, Matthew P Kirschen, Kerri L LaRovere, Marlina E Lovett, Michelle E Schober, Kristen A Smith, Katie Wolfe, Adrian D Zurca, Alexis A Topjian, Donald L Boyer
{"title":"儿科危重医学教育与专业发展:标准化课程、培训与评估:神经危重护理可信赖的专业活动。","authors":"Andrew E Becker, Nicholas S Abend, Giulia M Benedetti, Sandra D W Buttram, Melissa G Chung, Jennifer C Erklauer, Stuart H Friess, Sue J Hong, Jimmy Huh, Matthew P Kirschen, Kerri L LaRovere, Marlina E Lovett, Michelle E Schober, Kristen A Smith, Katie Wolfe, Adrian D Zurca, Alexis A Topjian, Donald L Boyer","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a set of pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey and Delphi methodology in a panel of experts from the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group (PNCRG) and the Education in Pediatric Intensive Care (EPIC) Research Collaborative.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Interprofessional local focus group, national focus group, and subsequent national multi-institutional, multidisciplinary expert panel in the United States.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>The interprofessional local group of 23 members carried out work March 2022 to June 2022 and the national group of 19 members October 2022 to November 2022. Subsequently, 38 physicians from the PNCRG and EPIC networks carried out work December 2022 to August 2024.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>First, a preliminary set of 15 PNCC EPAs was developed by two local and national interprofessional groups. The EPAs were based on the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) practice analysis for PCCM, the ABP PCCM content outline, and stakeholder opinion. Next, a panel of critical care, neurology, and education experts used Delphi methodology to generate consensus, edit, and finalize the EPAs, with content validity. All EPAs were edited; two were deemed non-essential and not included in the final set of 13 EPAs. The EPAs fit three categories: general management and principles; disease-specific management; and neuroprognostication and end-of-life care. Consensus was reached after three Delphi rounds, with response rates of 31 of 38, 29 of 31, and 29 of 31, respectively. The final set of EPAs was approved by 30 respondents (response rate 30/31), with content validity indices 0.81-1.00.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2024 set of 13 EPAs are intended to be a valuable framework for competency-based curriculum and assessment to ensure consistent PCCM proficiency in the provision of neurocritical care while also promoting standardization in curriculum development for PCCM fellowship trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurocritical Care Entrustable Professional Activities for Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Education and Professional Development: Standardizing Curriculum, Training, and Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew E Becker, Nicholas S Abend, Giulia M Benedetti, Sandra D W Buttram, Melissa G Chung, Jennifer C Erklauer, Stuart H Friess, Sue J Hong, Jimmy Huh, Matthew P Kirschen, Kerri L LaRovere, Marlina E Lovett, Michelle E Schober, Kristen A Smith, Katie Wolfe, Adrian D Zurca, Alexis A Topjian, Donald L Boyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a set of pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey and Delphi methodology in a panel of experts from the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group (PNCRG) and the Education in Pediatric Intensive Care (EPIC) Research Collaborative.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Interprofessional local focus group, national focus group, and subsequent national multi-institutional, multidisciplinary expert panel in the United States.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>The interprofessional local group of 23 members carried out work March 2022 to June 2022 and the national group of 19 members October 2022 to November 2022. Subsequently, 38 physicians from the PNCRG and EPIC networks carried out work December 2022 to August 2024.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>First, a preliminary set of 15 PNCC EPAs was developed by two local and national interprofessional groups. The EPAs were based on the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) practice analysis for PCCM, the ABP PCCM content outline, and stakeholder opinion. Next, a panel of critical care, neurology, and education experts used Delphi methodology to generate consensus, edit, and finalize the EPAs, with content validity. All EPAs were edited; two were deemed non-essential and not included in the final set of 13 EPAs. The EPAs fit three categories: general management and principles; disease-specific management; and neuroprognostication and end-of-life care. Consensus was reached after three Delphi rounds, with response rates of 31 of 38, 29 of 31, and 29 of 31, respectively. The final set of EPAs was approved by 30 respondents (response rate 30/31), with content validity indices 0.81-1.00.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2024 set of 13 EPAs are intended to be a valuable framework for competency-based curriculum and assessment to ensure consistent PCCM proficiency in the provision of neurocritical care while also promoting standardization in curriculum development for PCCM fellowship trainees.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003818\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003818","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为小儿危重医学(PCCM)开发一套小儿神经危重医学(PNCC)可信赖专业活动(EPAs)。设计:对来自儿科神经危重症护理研究小组(PNCRG)和儿科重症监护教育研究合作组织(EPIC)的专家小组进行调查和德尔菲法。背景:美国跨专业的地方焦点小组,全国焦点小组,以及随后的全国多机构、多学科专家小组。研究对象:跨专业的地方组23人,2022年3月至2022年6月开展工作;国家组19人,2022年10月至2022年11月开展工作。随后,来自PNCRG和EPIC网络的38名医生于2022年12月至2024年8月开展了工作。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:首先,由两个地方和国家跨专业小组开发了一套初步的15个PNCC epa。epa是基于美国儿科委员会(ABP)对PCCM的实践分析,ABP PCCM内容大纲和利益相关者的意见。接下来,一个由重症监护、神经病学和教育专家组成的小组使用德尔菲方法来产生共识、编辑和最终确定epa,并确定其内容有效性。所有epa都经过编辑;其中两项被视为非必需,不包括在最后一套13项环境影响评估中。环境保护协定可分为三类:一般管理和原则;针对疾病的管理;神经预测和临终关怀。经过三轮德尔菲后,达成了共识,38个应答率为31个,31个应答率为29个,31个应答率为29个。最终一套epa被30名受访者认可(回应率30/31),内容效度指数为0.81-1.00。结论:2024年的13个EPAs旨在成为一个有价值的基于能力的课程和评估框架,以确保PCCM在提供神经危重症护理方面的一贯熟练程度,同时也促进PCCM奖学金学员课程开发的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurocritical Care Entrustable Professional Activities for Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Education and Professional Development: Standardizing Curriculum, Training, and Assessment.

Objective: To develop a set of pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM).

Design: Survey and Delphi methodology in a panel of experts from the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group (PNCRG) and the Education in Pediatric Intensive Care (EPIC) Research Collaborative.

Setting: Interprofessional local focus group, national focus group, and subsequent national multi-institutional, multidisciplinary expert panel in the United States.

Subjects: The interprofessional local group of 23 members carried out work March 2022 to June 2022 and the national group of 19 members October 2022 to November 2022. Subsequently, 38 physicians from the PNCRG and EPIC networks carried out work December 2022 to August 2024.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: First, a preliminary set of 15 PNCC EPAs was developed by two local and national interprofessional groups. The EPAs were based on the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) practice analysis for PCCM, the ABP PCCM content outline, and stakeholder opinion. Next, a panel of critical care, neurology, and education experts used Delphi methodology to generate consensus, edit, and finalize the EPAs, with content validity. All EPAs were edited; two were deemed non-essential and not included in the final set of 13 EPAs. The EPAs fit three categories: general management and principles; disease-specific management; and neuroprognostication and end-of-life care. Consensus was reached after three Delphi rounds, with response rates of 31 of 38, 29 of 31, and 29 of 31, respectively. The final set of EPAs was approved by 30 respondents (response rate 30/31), with content validity indices 0.81-1.00.

Conclusions: The 2024 set of 13 EPAs are intended to be a valuable framework for competency-based curriculum and assessment to ensure consistent PCCM proficiency in the provision of neurocritical care while also promoting standardization in curriculum development for PCCM fellowship trainees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信