{"title":"接受贝伐单抗治疗的胶质母细胞瘤患者高血压时间的预后价值:一项回顾性单中心分析。","authors":"Irfan Kesumayadi, Atsushi Kambe, Hidefumi Amisaki, Tomohiro Hosoya, Makoto Sakamoto, Masamichi Kurosaki","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-05209-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypertension, the most common adverse events associated with bevacizumab (BEV) treatment, has been proposed as a potential biomarker of treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether the timing of hypertension serves as a prognostic value in GBM patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study consisting of 56 GBM patients treated with initial BEV between 2013 and 2024. Blood pressure was monitored peri-infusion of BEV (before and 60 min after). Patients were grouped into normotension, pre-existing hypertension (before first BEV infusion), and BEV-induced hypertension, further classified as early new-onset (≤ 3 cycles) or late-onset (> 3 cycles). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen (36.6%) patients had pre-existing hypertension, while 26 (63.4%) were normotensive at baseline. Among the normotensive patients, twelve (46.1%) developed early new-onset hypertension, and 13 (50%) developed late-onset hypertension. Patients with pre-existing hypertension demonstrated significantly longer median OS compared to normotensive patients (32 vs. 22 months, p = 0.043). Early new-onset hypertension was also associated with improved OS compared to patients who remained normotensive after three cycles (25 vs. 16 months, p = 0.003). Additionally, patients with pre-existing and early new-onset hypertension showed longer OS compared to those with late-onset hypertension (25 vs. 14 months, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Monitoring blood pressure during peri-infusion of BEV could be useful in predicting treatment response for GBM patients. Pre-existing or early new-onset hypertension is associated with improved survival, suggesting that timing of hypertension has a potential role as a biomarker for BEV efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1425-1433"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of hypertension timing for survival in glioblastoma patients receiving bevacizumab: a retrospective single centre analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Irfan Kesumayadi, Atsushi Kambe, Hidefumi Amisaki, Tomohiro Hosoya, Makoto Sakamoto, Masamichi Kurosaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-025-05209-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypertension, the most common adverse events associated with bevacizumab (BEV) treatment, has been proposed as a potential biomarker of treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether the timing of hypertension serves as a prognostic value in GBM patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study consisting of 56 GBM patients treated with initial BEV between 2013 and 2024. Blood pressure was monitored peri-infusion of BEV (before and 60 min after). Patients were grouped into normotension, pre-existing hypertension (before first BEV infusion), and BEV-induced hypertension, further classified as early new-onset (≤ 3 cycles) or late-onset (> 3 cycles). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen (36.6%) patients had pre-existing hypertension, while 26 (63.4%) were normotensive at baseline. Among the normotensive patients, twelve (46.1%) developed early new-onset hypertension, and 13 (50%) developed late-onset hypertension. Patients with pre-existing hypertension demonstrated significantly longer median OS compared to normotensive patients (32 vs. 22 months, p = 0.043). Early new-onset hypertension was also associated with improved OS compared to patients who remained normotensive after three cycles (25 vs. 16 months, p = 0.003). Additionally, patients with pre-existing and early new-onset hypertension showed longer OS compared to those with late-onset hypertension (25 vs. 14 months, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Monitoring blood pressure during peri-infusion of BEV could be useful in predicting treatment response for GBM patients. Pre-existing or early new-onset hypertension is associated with improved survival, suggesting that timing of hypertension has a potential role as a biomarker for BEV efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1425-1433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05209-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05209-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prognostic value of hypertension timing for survival in glioblastoma patients receiving bevacizumab: a retrospective single centre analysis.
Introduction: Hypertension, the most common adverse events associated with bevacizumab (BEV) treatment, has been proposed as a potential biomarker of treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether the timing of hypertension serves as a prognostic value in GBM patients.
Methods: This retrospective study consisting of 56 GBM patients treated with initial BEV between 2013 and 2024. Blood pressure was monitored peri-infusion of BEV (before and 60 min after). Patients were grouped into normotension, pre-existing hypertension (before first BEV infusion), and BEV-induced hypertension, further classified as early new-onset (≤ 3 cycles) or late-onset (> 3 cycles). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: Fifteen (36.6%) patients had pre-existing hypertension, while 26 (63.4%) were normotensive at baseline. Among the normotensive patients, twelve (46.1%) developed early new-onset hypertension, and 13 (50%) developed late-onset hypertension. Patients with pre-existing hypertension demonstrated significantly longer median OS compared to normotensive patients (32 vs. 22 months, p = 0.043). Early new-onset hypertension was also associated with improved OS compared to patients who remained normotensive after three cycles (25 vs. 16 months, p = 0.003). Additionally, patients with pre-existing and early new-onset hypertension showed longer OS compared to those with late-onset hypertension (25 vs. 14 months, p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Monitoring blood pressure during peri-infusion of BEV could be useful in predicting treatment response for GBM patients. Pre-existing or early new-onset hypertension is associated with improved survival, suggesting that timing of hypertension has a potential role as a biomarker for BEV efficacy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.