使用机器学习预测胃癌术后并发症的时间顺序:一项多中心队列研究。

IF 5.1 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Motonari Ri, Souya Nunobe, Tomonori Narita, Yasuyuki Seto, Yoshimasa Kawazoe, Kazuhiko Ohe, Lena Azuma, Nobuyoshi Takeshita
{"title":"使用机器学习预测胃癌术后并发症的时间顺序:一项多中心队列研究。","authors":"Motonari Ri, Souya Nunobe, Tomonori Narita, Yasuyuki Seto, Yoshimasa Kawazoe, Kazuhiko Ohe, Lena Azuma, Nobuyoshi Takeshita","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01658-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although many studies have developed logistic regression models for predicting complications using preoperative and intraoperative data, none have applied comprehensive perioperative information with machine learning (ML) to enable time-sequential predictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery between 2013 and 2019 at two hospitals. Comprehensive perioperative data were collected. Four ML models were developed: the postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 3 models predicted complications occurring from POD 2 and POD 4, while the 24-h and 8-h models predicted complications within the 24 and 8 h, respectively, after collection of the most recent biochemical data and vital signs. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with repeated validation for generalizability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4139 patients, 782 (18.9%) experienced complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II). The 8-h model achieved the highest AUC (0.737) for overall complications. The POD 3 model outperformed the POD 1 model, with AUCs exceeding 0.8 for pancreatic fistula (0.869) and intra-abdominal abscess (0.821). The 8-h and the 24-h model both achieved AUCs above 0.8 for specific infectious complications. The 8-h model demonstrated the following AUCs: 0.889 for pancreatic fistula, 0.842 for intra-abdominal abscess, 0.826 for pneumonia, and 0.824 for anastomotic leakage, surpassing all POD-based models. In each 8-h model, C-reactive protein, pulse rate, and intraoperative blood loss consistently emerged as significant variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hour-based ML models incorporating comprehensive perioperative data predict post-gastric cancer surgery complications with high accuracy and time-sequential capability, potentially aiding clinical decision-making and improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-sequential prediction of postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery using machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Motonari Ri, Souya Nunobe, Tomonori Narita, Yasuyuki Seto, Yoshimasa Kawazoe, Kazuhiko Ohe, Lena Azuma, Nobuyoshi Takeshita\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10120-025-01658-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although many studies have developed logistic regression models for predicting complications using preoperative and intraoperative data, none have applied comprehensive perioperative information with machine learning (ML) to enable time-sequential predictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery between 2013 and 2019 at two hospitals. Comprehensive perioperative data were collected. Four ML models were developed: the postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 3 models predicted complications occurring from POD 2 and POD 4, while the 24-h and 8-h models predicted complications within the 24 and 8 h, respectively, after collection of the most recent biochemical data and vital signs. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with repeated validation for generalizability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4139 patients, 782 (18.9%) experienced complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II). The 8-h model achieved the highest AUC (0.737) for overall complications. The POD 3 model outperformed the POD 1 model, with AUCs exceeding 0.8 for pancreatic fistula (0.869) and intra-abdominal abscess (0.821). The 8-h and the 24-h model both achieved AUCs above 0.8 for specific infectious complications. The 8-h model demonstrated the following AUCs: 0.889 for pancreatic fistula, 0.842 for intra-abdominal abscess, 0.826 for pneumonia, and 0.824 for anastomotic leakage, surpassing all POD-based models. In each 8-h model, C-reactive protein, pulse rate, and intraoperative blood loss consistently emerged as significant variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hour-based ML models incorporating comprehensive perioperative data predict post-gastric cancer surgery complications with high accuracy and time-sequential capability, potentially aiding clinical decision-making and improving outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastric Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastric Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01658-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastric Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01658-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管许多研究已经建立了逻辑回归模型,利用术前和术中数据预测并发症,但没有一个研究将全面的围手术期信息与机器学习(ML)结合起来,实现时间序列预测。方法:本研究纳入了2013年至2019年在两家医院接受胃癌手术的患者。收集全面的围手术期资料。建立了4种ML模型:术后第1天(POD)和第3天(POD)模型预测第2天(POD)和第4天(POD)发生的并发症,24小时和8小时模型分别预测收集最新生化数据和生命体征后24小时和8小时内的并发症。使用受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积来评估模型的性能,并反复验证其通用性。结果:4139例患者中,782例(18.9%)出现并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级≥II)。8 h模型的总并发症AUC最高(0.737)。POD 3模型优于POD 1模型,胰瘘(0.869)和腹内脓肿(0.821)的auc均超过0.8。对于特定的感染并发症,8-h和24-h模型的auc均在0.8以上。8 h模型的auc:胰瘘为0.889,腹腔脓肿为0.842,肺炎为0.826,吻合口漏为0.824,优于所有基于pod的模型。在每个8-h模型中,c反应蛋白、脉搏率和术中出血量一致成为重要变量。结论:基于小时的ML模型结合了全面的围手术期数据,预测胃癌术后并发症具有较高的准确性和时间序列能力,可能有助于临床决策和改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time-sequential prediction of postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery using machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.

Background: Although many studies have developed logistic regression models for predicting complications using preoperative and intraoperative data, none have applied comprehensive perioperative information with machine learning (ML) to enable time-sequential predictions.

Methods: This study included patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery between 2013 and 2019 at two hospitals. Comprehensive perioperative data were collected. Four ML models were developed: the postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 3 models predicted complications occurring from POD 2 and POD 4, while the 24-h and 8-h models predicted complications within the 24 and 8 h, respectively, after collection of the most recent biochemical data and vital signs. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with repeated validation for generalizability.

Results: Among 4139 patients, 782 (18.9%) experienced complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II). The 8-h model achieved the highest AUC (0.737) for overall complications. The POD 3 model outperformed the POD 1 model, with AUCs exceeding 0.8 for pancreatic fistula (0.869) and intra-abdominal abscess (0.821). The 8-h and the 24-h model both achieved AUCs above 0.8 for specific infectious complications. The 8-h model demonstrated the following AUCs: 0.889 for pancreatic fistula, 0.842 for intra-abdominal abscess, 0.826 for pneumonia, and 0.824 for anastomotic leakage, surpassing all POD-based models. In each 8-h model, C-reactive protein, pulse rate, and intraoperative blood loss consistently emerged as significant variables.

Conclusion: Hour-based ML models incorporating comprehensive perioperative data predict post-gastric cancer surgery complications with high accuracy and time-sequential capability, potentially aiding clinical decision-making and improving outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastric Cancer
Gastric Cancer 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastric Cancer is an esteemed global forum that focuses on various aspects of gastric cancer research, treatment, and biology worldwide. The journal promotes a diverse range of content, including original articles, case reports, short communications, and technical notes. It also welcomes Letters to the Editor discussing published articles or sharing viewpoints on gastric cancer topics. Review articles are predominantly sought after by the Editor, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the field. With a dedicated and knowledgeable editorial team, the journal is committed to providing exceptional support and ensuring high levels of author satisfaction. In fact, over 90% of published authors have expressed their intent to publish again in our esteemed journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信