手术和非手术方法治疗局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者的耐受性、毒性和结果:多中心回顾性队列研究

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zraf078
{"title":"手术和非手术方法治疗局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者的耐受性、毒性和结果:多中心回顾性队列研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma is the predominant histopathological subtype of oesophageal cancer across the world, representing as many as 90% of all cases; however, within Western cohorts, it is a low-prevalence disease, and, as such, appropriately powered trials to establish a standard treatment paradigm in this population remain challenging. The aim of this study was to assess current practices and compare outcomes for patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma across the UK and Ireland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective multicentre cohort study of patients managed with curative intent for squamous cell carcinoma of the middle or distal oesophagus in 23 hospitals across the UK and Ireland. Consecutive patients diagnosed between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 1545 patients, of whom 923 (59.7%) received definitive chemoradiotherapy, 286 (18.5%) neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery, 218 (14.1%) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery, and 118 (7.6%) surgery alone. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery was associated with significantly longer survival than neoadjuvant chemotherapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy (median 83.9 versus 27.8 versus 26.5 months). In propensity score-matched analysis of overall survival, patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery had significantly longer survival than those who had definitive chemoradiotherapy (median 56.8 versus 43.1 months; hazard ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.78; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This multicentre retrospective cohort study suggests that, despite a majority of patients being treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy, patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery have improved survival compared with those receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery. In the absence of robust Western randomized clinical trial data, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery should be considered the standard for well selected patients fit for surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tolerability, toxicity, and outcomes following surgical and non-surgical approaches to the management of patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: multicentre retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma is the predominant histopathological subtype of oesophageal cancer across the world, representing as many as 90% of all cases; however, within Western cohorts, it is a low-prevalence disease, and, as such, appropriately powered trials to establish a standard treatment paradigm in this population remain challenging. The aim of this study was to assess current practices and compare outcomes for patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma across the UK and Ireland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective multicentre cohort study of patients managed with curative intent for squamous cell carcinoma of the middle or distal oesophagus in 23 hospitals across the UK and Ireland. Consecutive patients diagnosed between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 1545 patients, of whom 923 (59.7%) received definitive chemoradiotherapy, 286 (18.5%) neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery, 218 (14.1%) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery, and 118 (7.6%) surgery alone. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery was associated with significantly longer survival than neoadjuvant chemotherapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy (median 83.9 versus 27.8 versus 26.5 months). In propensity score-matched analysis of overall survival, patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery had significantly longer survival than those who had definitive chemoradiotherapy (median 56.8 versus 43.1 months; hazard ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.78; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This multicentre retrospective cohort study suggests that, despite a majority of patients being treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy, patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery have improved survival compared with those receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery. In the absence of robust Western randomized clinical trial data, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery should be considered the standard for well selected patients fit for surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJS Open\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416563/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJS Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraf078\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraf078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:食管鳞状细胞癌是世界范围内食管癌的主要组织病理学亚型,占所有病例的90%;然而,在西方队列中,它是一种低患病率疾病,因此,在这一人群中建立标准治疗范例的适当试验仍然具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估当前的做法,并比较英国和爱尔兰局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者的结果。方法:这是一项回顾性多中心队列研究,在英国和爱尔兰的23家医院对食管中端或远端鳞状细胞癌进行治疗。纳入2012年1月1日至2016年12月31日诊断的连续患者。结果:本研究纳入1545例患者,其中明确放化疗923例(59.7%),新辅助放化疗+手术286例(18.5%),新辅助放化疗+手术218例(14.1%),单纯手术118例(7.6%)。新辅助放化疗+手术的生存率明显高于新辅助化疗或最终放化疗(中位83.9个月vs 27.8个月vs 26.5个月)。在总生存倾向评分匹配分析中,接受新辅助放化疗+手术的患者的生存期明显高于接受明确放化疗的患者(中位56.8个月vs 43.1个月;风险比0.39,95%可信区间0.20 ~ 0.78;P < 0.001)。结论:这项多中心回顾性队列研究表明,尽管大多数患者接受了确定性放化疗,但与接受确定性放化疗或新辅助化疗+手术的患者相比,接受新辅助放化疗和手术的患者生存率更高。在缺乏可靠的西方随机临床试验数据的情况下,新辅助放化疗+手术应该被认为是选择适合手术的患者的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Tolerability, toxicity, and outcomes following surgical and non-surgical approaches to the management of patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Tolerability, toxicity, and outcomes following surgical and non-surgical approaches to the management of patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Tolerability, toxicity, and outcomes following surgical and non-surgical approaches to the management of patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Tolerability, toxicity, and outcomes following surgical and non-surgical approaches to the management of patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Background: Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma is the predominant histopathological subtype of oesophageal cancer across the world, representing as many as 90% of all cases; however, within Western cohorts, it is a low-prevalence disease, and, as such, appropriately powered trials to establish a standard treatment paradigm in this population remain challenging. The aim of this study was to assess current practices and compare outcomes for patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma across the UK and Ireland.

Methods: This was a retrospective multicentre cohort study of patients managed with curative intent for squamous cell carcinoma of the middle or distal oesophagus in 23 hospitals across the UK and Ireland. Consecutive patients diagnosed between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016 were included.

Results: This study included 1545 patients, of whom 923 (59.7%) received definitive chemoradiotherapy, 286 (18.5%) neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery, 218 (14.1%) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery, and 118 (7.6%) surgery alone. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery was associated with significantly longer survival than neoadjuvant chemotherapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy (median 83.9 versus 27.8 versus 26.5 months). In propensity score-matched analysis of overall survival, patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery had significantly longer survival than those who had definitive chemoradiotherapy (median 56.8 versus 43.1 months; hazard ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.78; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: This multicentre retrospective cohort study suggests that, despite a majority of patients being treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy, patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery have improved survival compared with those receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery. In the absence of robust Western randomized clinical trial data, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery should be considered the standard for well selected patients fit for surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信