Simon Lecoq , Gabriel Davoise , Samir Henni , Eva Deveze , Pierre Abraham , Jeanne Hersant
{"title":"MASC(手臂活动度评分):一种评估疑似胸廓出口综合征患者功能损害的短且侧特异性工具。","authors":"Simon Lecoq , Gabriel Davoise , Samir Henni , Eva Deveze , Pierre Abraham , Jeanne Hersant","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is characterized by the positional compression of the brachial plexus and/or subclavian vessels in the cervico-thoraco-brachial region, unilaterally or bilaterally. The functional impact is currently assessed by questionnaires that do not allow side-specific assessments. The Mobility of Arm Score (MASC) questionnaire was designed to be short and assess the functional impact of suspected TOS, emphasizing dynamic tasks and side-specific evaluations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We prospectively recruited 200 patients referred to the vascular medicine department of the University Hospital of Angers for suspected TOS. They completed the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and MASC questionnaires. Feasibility was evaluated by comparing the rates of scorable questionnaires using the McNemar test. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the relationship between MASC from the most affected arm and the DASH and Quick-DASH (Q-DASH) scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The rate of scorable questionnaires was significantly higher for the MASC (98.5%) than for the DASH (90.5%; <em>P</em> < 0.001) or Q-DASH (94%; <em>P</em> < 0.001). Pearson correlation coefficients between the MASC score for the most affected arm and the DASH and Q-DASH scores were 0.835 (<em>P</em> < 0.001) and 0.825 (<em>P</em> < 0.001), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The MASC questionnaire demonstrated excellent feasibility and a strong correlation with the DASH and Q-DASH questionnaires. It offers valuable insights into the laterality of the symptoms in patients with suspected TOS. Future research should explore the sensitivity to changes of the MASC in the longitudinal follow-up of treated patients to validate these preliminary findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"122 ","pages":"Pages 599-607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mobility of Arm Score: A Short and Side-Specific Tool to Assess Functional Impairment in Patients with Suspected Thoracic Outlet Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Simon Lecoq , Gabriel Davoise , Samir Henni , Eva Deveze , Pierre Abraham , Jeanne Hersant\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is characterized by the positional compression of the brachial plexus and/or subclavian vessels in the cervico-thoraco-brachial region, unilaterally or bilaterally. The functional impact is currently assessed by questionnaires that do not allow side-specific assessments. The Mobility of Arm Score (MASC) questionnaire was designed to be short and assess the functional impact of suspected TOS, emphasizing dynamic tasks and side-specific evaluations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We prospectively recruited 200 patients referred to the vascular medicine department of the University Hospital of Angers for suspected TOS. They completed the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and MASC questionnaires. Feasibility was evaluated by comparing the rates of scorable questionnaires using the McNemar test. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the relationship between MASC from the most affected arm and the DASH and Quick-DASH (Q-DASH) scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The rate of scorable questionnaires was significantly higher for the MASC (98.5%) than for the DASH (90.5%; <em>P</em> < 0.001) or Q-DASH (94%; <em>P</em> < 0.001). Pearson correlation coefficients between the MASC score for the most affected arm and the DASH and Q-DASH scores were 0.835 (<em>P</em> < 0.001) and 0.825 (<em>P</em> < 0.001), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The MASC questionnaire demonstrated excellent feasibility and a strong correlation with the DASH and Q-DASH questionnaires. It offers valuable insights into the laterality of the symptoms in patients with suspected TOS. Future research should explore the sensitivity to changes of the MASC in the longitudinal follow-up of treated patients to validate these preliminary findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 599-607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089050962500593X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089050962500593X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Mobility of Arm Score: A Short and Side-Specific Tool to Assess Functional Impairment in Patients with Suspected Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
Background
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is characterized by the positional compression of the brachial plexus and/or subclavian vessels in the cervico-thoraco-brachial region, unilaterally or bilaterally. The functional impact is currently assessed by questionnaires that do not allow side-specific assessments. The Mobility of Arm Score (MASC) questionnaire was designed to be short and assess the functional impact of suspected TOS, emphasizing dynamic tasks and side-specific evaluations.
Methods
We prospectively recruited 200 patients referred to the vascular medicine department of the University Hospital of Angers for suspected TOS. They completed the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and MASC questionnaires. Feasibility was evaluated by comparing the rates of scorable questionnaires using the McNemar test. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the relationship between MASC from the most affected arm and the DASH and Quick-DASH (Q-DASH) scores.
Results
The rate of scorable questionnaires was significantly higher for the MASC (98.5%) than for the DASH (90.5%; P < 0.001) or Q-DASH (94%; P < 0.001). Pearson correlation coefficients between the MASC score for the most affected arm and the DASH and Q-DASH scores were 0.835 (P < 0.001) and 0.825 (P < 0.001), respectively.
Conclusion
The MASC questionnaire demonstrated excellent feasibility and a strong correlation with the DASH and Q-DASH questionnaires. It offers valuable insights into the laterality of the symptoms in patients with suspected TOS. Future research should explore the sensitivity to changes of the MASC in the longitudinal follow-up of treated patients to validate these preliminary findings.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal:
Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials)
Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work)
Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients)
General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic)
Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery
Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers)
Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery)
Editorials/Correspondence