超越悖论:心脏特异性miR-106a递送作为心力衰竭的转译转折点?

IF 1.9
Wei-Wen Lim
{"title":"超越悖论:心脏特异性miR-106a递送作为心力衰竭的转译转折点?","authors":"Wei-Wen Lim","doi":"10.1002/ctd2.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Heart failure (HF) remains a global health burden and a leading cause of death and disability. In Asia, HF prevalence is projected to reach 74.5 million by 2050, a 127.6% increase from 2025,<span><sup>1</sup></span> driven by rising cardiometabolic disease across the region. While current therapies target haemodynamic impairment and pathological neurohormonal hyperactivation, they offer limited benefit against progressive myocardial decline and cardiovascular mortality. Novel therapeutics are urgently needed to overcome challenges of poor tissue specificity, limited intracellular delivery and suboptimal pharmacokinetics.</p><p>MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs, typically 20–24 nucleotides long, that regulate key post-transcriptional gene expression by binding to complementary sequences in messenger RNAs (mRNAs), leading to mRNA degradation or inhibition of translation. MiRNAs have recently emerged as promising biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in HF. Their clinical translation, however, hinges on precise delivery to minimize off-target effects and enhancing biodistribution. In this context, Lu et al. recently reported a cardiac targeting peptide (CTP; 12-amino acid sequence APWHLSSQYSRT) conjugated to miR-106a (CTP–miR-106a), which reversed cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction in an angiotensin II/isoproterenol-induced mouse model of HF.<span><sup>2</sup></span> This study builds on prior in vitro evidence demonstrating that CTP–miR-106a selectively attenuates phenylephrine- and angiotensin II-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, with preferential uptake over the human embryonic kidney 293 cell line, cardiac fibroblasts and endothelial cells.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>Following intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg of the dual-reporter construct Cy5.5–CTP–miR-106a–Cy3, which is linked via a disulphide bond cleavable by endogenous reductases to release Cy5.5–CTP and miR-106a–Cy3, cardiac expression of miR-106a peaked at 30 min post-injection.<span><sup>2</sup></span> This was accompanied by tissue-level expression of the miR-106a–Cy3 reporter. The Cy5.5–CTP moiety was subsequently expelled from the myocardium within 3.5 h and cleared via hepatic and renal pathways. In contrast, miR-106a–Cy3 remained upregulated in cardiac tissue at 3.5 h, and elevated miR-106a mRNA levels persisted up to 7 days. Importantly, neither miR-106a–Cy3 nor miR-106a gene expression was detected in the liver, kidney or lung, suggesting cardiac-specific uptake. However, this observation contrasts with earlier studies by the same group, in which mice injected with 10 mg/kg of Cy5.5–CTP alone (without miR-106a moiety) exhibited robust and peak uptake in the liver and kidney as early as 15 min post-injection.<span><sup>4</sup></span> This uptake paralleled the observations in the heart but declined more slowly, indicating delayed clearance.</p><p>Despite these findings, the precise mechanisms underlying CTP's cardiac specificity remain unclear. It is unknown whether uptake occurs via a dedicated membrane receptor or through receptor-independent transduction and endocytosis pathways.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Similarly, the mechanism responsible for the subsequent expulsion of the CTP moiety from cardiomyocytes is not well understood. Preliminary findings suggest that the potassium voltage-gated channel KCNH5 may be involved in CTP transduction and uptake<span><sup>4</sup></span>; however, definitive evidence from cardiomyocyte-specific knock-out or non-cardiomyocyte knock-in models are lacking. Notably, the same group reported minimal toxicity following a single dose of CTP. No significant effects were observed on key ion channels responsible for electrical conduction in cardiomyocytes in vitro, nor were there any overt adverse effects on haematological and blood chemistry parameters, blood pressure or magnetic resonance imaging-based cardiac function.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Collectively, these findings support a favourable safety profile for the CTP delivery system.</p><p>While this novel therapeutic delivery system suggests a promising cardiac-targeted application of miR-106a for HF, these findings contrast with earlier studies demonstrating pathogenic roles of miR-106a in cardiac disease. Guan et al. reported that miR-106a contributes to cardiac hypertrophy in a transverse aortic constriction model of pressure overload in mice, as well as in angiotensin II-treated cardiomyocytes. This effect was mediated through direct targeting of mitofusin 2, thereby modulating mitochondrial dynamics by impairing the fusion process.<span><sup>7</sup></span> Similarly, Hao et al. identified a pathogenic role of endogenous miR-106a upregulation in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, which could be attenuated by the long non-coding RNA FGD5-AS1 via activation of SMAD5.<span><sup>8</sup></span> The reasons underlying the apparent complexity and conflicting roles of miR-106a across studies remain unclear. Potential contributing factors include differences in bioavailability among delivery systems, cell- versus organ-specific targeting, endogenous expression versus exogenous administration of miR-106a, and the pathological distinctions between cardiac disease models. Further investigations using both miR-106a mimics and inhibitors are warranted to elucidate these pleiotropic effects and to clarify its therapeutic potential (Figure 1).</p><p>In patients with acute HF, plasma levels of miR-106a have been reported to be downregulated, exhibiting negative correlations with NT-proBNP and hs-CRP levels, which are two well-established biomarkers of HF severity.<span><sup>9, 10</sup></span> This inverse relationship suggests a potential protective role of miR-106a in modulating hemodynamic stress and inflammation, thereby supporting the rationale for exogenous restoration as a therapeutic strategy. However, conflicting evidence exists: upregulation of miR-106a has also been reported in the serum of patients with acute myocardial infarction,<span><sup>8</sup></span> challenging the therapeutic premise of supplementation in the context of impaired cardiac function and subsequent HF. Beyond cardiovascular disease, miR-106a is frequently dysregulated across a spectrum of malignancies and non-cancer pathologies,<span><sup>11</sup></span> with evidence supporting both tumour-suppressive and oncogenic roles. These inconsistencies, both in miR-106 expression patterns and detection methodologies, even within studies of the same disease, complicate its clinical translation. Given its inclusion in the proto-oncogenic miR-106a-363 cluster, the potential for oncogenic activation following chronic overexpression or sustained cardiac delivery of miR-106a warrants careful investigation. Addressing this risk is essential before advancing miR-106a-based therapies towards clinical application.</p><p>It is increasingly evident that miRNAs play a crucial role in regulating cardiac hypertrophy and failure development, yet the mechanistic underpinnings and translational potential for such targeted therapy remain incompletely understood. Advances in deep RNA sequencing and bioinformatics have significantly expanded our ability to profile miRNA landscapes in detail and infer functional networks in HF. As more direct mRNA targets of miRNAs are experimentally validated, systems-level pathway analysis will be critical to unravel the complex and context-dependent roles of miRNAs in cardiac remodelling. In this light, miR-106a exemplifies a paradox: its downregulation in acute HF suggests a protective role against hemodynamic stress and inflammation, while its upregulation in myocardial infarction and potential oncogenic activity within the miR-106a∼363 cluster raises concerns about unintended consequences of therapeutic restoration. Resolving this duality—between hypertrophic regression and proliferative risk—will require integrative studies that span cardiac, inflammatory and oncogenic signalling axes, before miR-106a-based interventions can be safely introduced into the clinic.</p><p>W.-W.L. conceptualized, visualized, wrote and edited the manuscript.</p><p>The author declares that he has no known competing commercial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported here.</p><p>Ethics approval and informed consent are not applicable to this article as the commentary was conducted based on available publications.</p>","PeriodicalId":72605,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and translational discovery","volume":"5 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ctd2.70084","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the paradox: Cardiac-specific miR-106a delivery as a translational turning point for heart failure?\",\"authors\":\"Wei-Wen Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ctd2.70084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Heart failure (HF) remains a global health burden and a leading cause of death and disability. In Asia, HF prevalence is projected to reach 74.5 million by 2050, a 127.6% increase from 2025,<span><sup>1</sup></span> driven by rising cardiometabolic disease across the region. While current therapies target haemodynamic impairment and pathological neurohormonal hyperactivation, they offer limited benefit against progressive myocardial decline and cardiovascular mortality. Novel therapeutics are urgently needed to overcome challenges of poor tissue specificity, limited intracellular delivery and suboptimal pharmacokinetics.</p><p>MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs, typically 20–24 nucleotides long, that regulate key post-transcriptional gene expression by binding to complementary sequences in messenger RNAs (mRNAs), leading to mRNA degradation or inhibition of translation. MiRNAs have recently emerged as promising biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in HF. Their clinical translation, however, hinges on precise delivery to minimize off-target effects and enhancing biodistribution. In this context, Lu et al. recently reported a cardiac targeting peptide (CTP; 12-amino acid sequence APWHLSSQYSRT) conjugated to miR-106a (CTP–miR-106a), which reversed cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction in an angiotensin II/isoproterenol-induced mouse model of HF.<span><sup>2</sup></span> This study builds on prior in vitro evidence demonstrating that CTP–miR-106a selectively attenuates phenylephrine- and angiotensin II-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, with preferential uptake over the human embryonic kidney 293 cell line, cardiac fibroblasts and endothelial cells.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>Following intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg of the dual-reporter construct Cy5.5–CTP–miR-106a–Cy3, which is linked via a disulphide bond cleavable by endogenous reductases to release Cy5.5–CTP and miR-106a–Cy3, cardiac expression of miR-106a peaked at 30 min post-injection.<span><sup>2</sup></span> This was accompanied by tissue-level expression of the miR-106a–Cy3 reporter. The Cy5.5–CTP moiety was subsequently expelled from the myocardium within 3.5 h and cleared via hepatic and renal pathways. In contrast, miR-106a–Cy3 remained upregulated in cardiac tissue at 3.5 h, and elevated miR-106a mRNA levels persisted up to 7 days. Importantly, neither miR-106a–Cy3 nor miR-106a gene expression was detected in the liver, kidney or lung, suggesting cardiac-specific uptake. However, this observation contrasts with earlier studies by the same group, in which mice injected with 10 mg/kg of Cy5.5–CTP alone (without miR-106a moiety) exhibited robust and peak uptake in the liver and kidney as early as 15 min post-injection.<span><sup>4</sup></span> This uptake paralleled the observations in the heart but declined more slowly, indicating delayed clearance.</p><p>Despite these findings, the precise mechanisms underlying CTP's cardiac specificity remain unclear. It is unknown whether uptake occurs via a dedicated membrane receptor or through receptor-independent transduction and endocytosis pathways.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Similarly, the mechanism responsible for the subsequent expulsion of the CTP moiety from cardiomyocytes is not well understood. Preliminary findings suggest that the potassium voltage-gated channel KCNH5 may be involved in CTP transduction and uptake<span><sup>4</sup></span>; however, definitive evidence from cardiomyocyte-specific knock-out or non-cardiomyocyte knock-in models are lacking. Notably, the same group reported minimal toxicity following a single dose of CTP. No significant effects were observed on key ion channels responsible for electrical conduction in cardiomyocytes in vitro, nor were there any overt adverse effects on haematological and blood chemistry parameters, blood pressure or magnetic resonance imaging-based cardiac function.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Collectively, these findings support a favourable safety profile for the CTP delivery system.</p><p>While this novel therapeutic delivery system suggests a promising cardiac-targeted application of miR-106a for HF, these findings contrast with earlier studies demonstrating pathogenic roles of miR-106a in cardiac disease. Guan et al. reported that miR-106a contributes to cardiac hypertrophy in a transverse aortic constriction model of pressure overload in mice, as well as in angiotensin II-treated cardiomyocytes. This effect was mediated through direct targeting of mitofusin 2, thereby modulating mitochondrial dynamics by impairing the fusion process.<span><sup>7</sup></span> Similarly, Hao et al. identified a pathogenic role of endogenous miR-106a upregulation in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, which could be attenuated by the long non-coding RNA FGD5-AS1 via activation of SMAD5.<span><sup>8</sup></span> The reasons underlying the apparent complexity and conflicting roles of miR-106a across studies remain unclear. Potential contributing factors include differences in bioavailability among delivery systems, cell- versus organ-specific targeting, endogenous expression versus exogenous administration of miR-106a, and the pathological distinctions between cardiac disease models. Further investigations using both miR-106a mimics and inhibitors are warranted to elucidate these pleiotropic effects and to clarify its therapeutic potential (Figure 1).</p><p>In patients with acute HF, plasma levels of miR-106a have been reported to be downregulated, exhibiting negative correlations with NT-proBNP and hs-CRP levels, which are two well-established biomarkers of HF severity.<span><sup>9, 10</sup></span> This inverse relationship suggests a potential protective role of miR-106a in modulating hemodynamic stress and inflammation, thereby supporting the rationale for exogenous restoration as a therapeutic strategy. However, conflicting evidence exists: upregulation of miR-106a has also been reported in the serum of patients with acute myocardial infarction,<span><sup>8</sup></span> challenging the therapeutic premise of supplementation in the context of impaired cardiac function and subsequent HF. Beyond cardiovascular disease, miR-106a is frequently dysregulated across a spectrum of malignancies and non-cancer pathologies,<span><sup>11</sup></span> with evidence supporting both tumour-suppressive and oncogenic roles. These inconsistencies, both in miR-106 expression patterns and detection methodologies, even within studies of the same disease, complicate its clinical translation. Given its inclusion in the proto-oncogenic miR-106a-363 cluster, the potential for oncogenic activation following chronic overexpression or sustained cardiac delivery of miR-106a warrants careful investigation. Addressing this risk is essential before advancing miR-106a-based therapies towards clinical application.</p><p>It is increasingly evident that miRNAs play a crucial role in regulating cardiac hypertrophy and failure development, yet the mechanistic underpinnings and translational potential for such targeted therapy remain incompletely understood. Advances in deep RNA sequencing and bioinformatics have significantly expanded our ability to profile miRNA landscapes in detail and infer functional networks in HF. As more direct mRNA targets of miRNAs are experimentally validated, systems-level pathway analysis will be critical to unravel the complex and context-dependent roles of miRNAs in cardiac remodelling. In this light, miR-106a exemplifies a paradox: its downregulation in acute HF suggests a protective role against hemodynamic stress and inflammation, while its upregulation in myocardial infarction and potential oncogenic activity within the miR-106a∼363 cluster raises concerns about unintended consequences of therapeutic restoration. Resolving this duality—between hypertrophic regression and proliferative risk—will require integrative studies that span cardiac, inflammatory and oncogenic signalling axes, before miR-106a-based interventions can be safely introduced into the clinic.</p><p>W.-W.L. conceptualized, visualized, wrote and edited the manuscript.</p><p>The author declares that he has no known competing commercial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported here.</p><p>Ethics approval and informed consent are not applicable to this article as the commentary was conducted based on available publications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and translational discovery\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ctd2.70084\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and translational discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctd2.70084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and translational discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctd2.70084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心力衰竭仍然是全球健康负担,也是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因。在亚洲,心衰患病率预计到2050年将达到7450万,比2025年增加127.6%,1原因是该地区心脏代谢疾病的增加。虽然目前的治疗目标是血流动力学损伤和病理性神经激素过度激活,但它们对进行性心肌衰退和心血管死亡的益处有限。迫切需要新的治疗方法来克服组织特异性差,细胞内递送有限和次优药代动力学的挑战。MicroRNAs (miRNAs)是一种小的非编码rna,通常长20-24个核苷酸,通过结合信使rna (mRNA)中的互补序列来调节关键的转录后基因表达,导致mRNA降解或抑制翻译。近年来,mirna已成为心衰治疗中有前景的生物标志物和潜在的治疗靶点。然而,它们的临床转化取决于精确的递送,以最大限度地减少脱靶效应并增强生物分布。在此背景下,Lu等人最近报道了一种心脏靶向肽(CTP;12个氨基酸序列APWHLSSQYSRT)偶联miR-106a (CTP-miR-106a),可逆转血管紧张素II/异丙肾上腺素诱导的小鼠hf模型中的心脏肥厚和功能障碍。本研究建立在先前的体外证据的基础上,证明CTP-miR-106a选择性地减弱苯肾上腺素和血管紧张素II诱导的心肌细胞肥厚,并优先摄取人胚胎肾293细胞系、心脏成纤维细胞和内皮细胞。静脉注射10mg /kg双报告结构Cy5.5-CTP - miR-106a - cy3后,miR-106a - cy3通过内源性还原酶可切割的二硫键连接,释放Cy5.5-CTP和miR-106a - cy3, miR-106a的心脏表达在注射后30分钟达到峰值这伴随着miR-106a-Cy3报告基因的组织水平表达。Cy5.5-CTP片段随后在3.5小时内从心肌中排出,并通过肝和肾途径清除。相比之下,miR-106a - cy3在心脏组织中在3.5 h保持上调,miR-106a mRNA水平升高持续至7天。重要的是,在肝脏、肾脏或肺中均未检测到miR-106a - cy3或miR-106a基因表达,这表明其具有心脏特异性摄取。然而,这一观察结果与同一组的早期研究形成对比,在该研究中,小鼠单独注射10mg /kg Cy5.5-CTP(不含miR-106a片段),在注射后15分钟就在肝脏和肾脏中表现出强劲和峰值摄取这种摄取与心脏的观察结果相似,但下降得更慢,表明清除延迟。尽管有这些发现,CTP心脏特异性的确切机制仍不清楚。目前尚不清楚摄取是通过专门的膜受体还是通过不依赖受体的转导和内吞途径发生的同样,导致CTP片段随后从心肌细胞中排出的机制也不清楚。初步发现钾电压门控通道KCNH5可能参与CTP的转导和摄取4;然而,缺乏心肌细胞特异性敲除或非心肌细胞敲入模型的明确证据。值得注意的是,同一组在单剂量CTP后报告的毒性最小。在体外实验中,对心肌细胞中负责电传导的关键离子通道没有观察到明显的影响,对血液学和血液化学参数、血压或基于磁共振成像的心功能也没有任何明显的不利影响总的来说,这些发现支持CTP给药系统具有良好的安全性。虽然这种新型的治疗递送系统表明miR-106a在心衰治疗中具有很好的心脏靶向应用前景,但这些发现与早期证明miR-106a在心脏病中的致病作用的研究形成对比。Guan等人报道了miR-106a在小鼠压力过载的横主动脉收缩模型中以及在血管紧张素ii处理的心肌细胞中促进心脏肥厚。这种效应是通过直接靶向mitofusin 2介导的,从而通过破坏融合过程来调节线粒体动力学同样,Hao等人发现了内源性miR-106a上调在心肌缺血/再灌注损伤中的致病作用,这种作用可以通过激活SMAD5.8被长链非编码RNA FGD5-AS1减弱。miR-106a在不同研究中的明显复杂性和相互冲突的作用背后的原因尚不清楚。潜在的影响因素包括递送系统之间的生物利用度差异、细胞特异性靶向与器官特异性靶向、miR-106a的内源性表达与外源性给药以及心脏病模型之间的病理差异。 有必要使用miR-106a模拟物和抑制剂进行进一步的研究,以阐明这些多效性作用并阐明其治疗潜力(图1)。据报道,在急性HF患者中,miR-106a血浆水平下调,与NT-proBNP和hs-CRP水平呈负相关,这是两种公认的HF严重程度的生物标志物。9,10这种反比关系表明miR-106a在调节血流动力学应激和炎症方面具有潜在的保护作用,从而支持外源性修复作为治疗策略的基本原理。然而,存在相互矛盾的证据:在急性心肌梗死患者的血清中也有miR-106a上调的报道,8挑战了在心功能受损和随后HF的情况下补充miR-106a的治疗前提。除心血管疾病外,miR-106a在一系列恶性肿瘤和非癌症病理中经常失调,11有证据支持肿瘤抑制和致癌作用。这些在miR-106表达模式和检测方法上的不一致性,即使在同一疾病的研究中,也使其临床转化复杂化。考虑到其包含在原致癌miR-106a-363簇中,慢性过表达或持续心脏输送miR-106a后的致癌激活潜力值得仔细研究。在将基于mir -106的疗法推向临床应用之前,解决这一风险至关重要。越来越明显的是,mirna在调节心脏肥厚和心力衰竭的发展中起着至关重要的作用,但这种靶向治疗的机制基础和转化潜力仍然不完全清楚。深度RNA测序和生物信息学的进步极大地扩展了我们详细描述miRNA景观和推断HF功能网络的能力。随着mirna更直接的mRNA靶点得到实验验证,系统水平的通路分析对于揭示mirna在心脏重构中的复杂和环境依赖性作用至关重要。在这种情况下,miR-106a例证了一个悖论:其在急性心衰中的下调表明其对血流动力学应激和炎症具有保护作用,而其在心肌梗死中的上调和miR-106a ~ 363簇内潜在的致癌活性引起了对治疗恢复的意外后果的担忧。在基于mir -106的干预措施可以安全地引入临床之前,解决这种肥厚性消退和增生性风险之间的二元性将需要跨越心脏、炎症和致癌信号轴的综合研究。对稿件进行概念化、形象化、写作和编辑。提交人声明,他没有任何已知的竞争商业利益或个人关系,可能影响此处报告的工作。伦理批准和知情同意不适用于本文,因为评论是基于现有出版物进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Beyond the paradox: Cardiac-specific miR-106a delivery as a translational turning point for heart failure?

Beyond the paradox: Cardiac-specific miR-106a delivery as a translational turning point for heart failure?

Heart failure (HF) remains a global health burden and a leading cause of death and disability. In Asia, HF prevalence is projected to reach 74.5 million by 2050, a 127.6% increase from 2025,1 driven by rising cardiometabolic disease across the region. While current therapies target haemodynamic impairment and pathological neurohormonal hyperactivation, they offer limited benefit against progressive myocardial decline and cardiovascular mortality. Novel therapeutics are urgently needed to overcome challenges of poor tissue specificity, limited intracellular delivery and suboptimal pharmacokinetics.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs, typically 20–24 nucleotides long, that regulate key post-transcriptional gene expression by binding to complementary sequences in messenger RNAs (mRNAs), leading to mRNA degradation or inhibition of translation. MiRNAs have recently emerged as promising biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in HF. Their clinical translation, however, hinges on precise delivery to minimize off-target effects and enhancing biodistribution. In this context, Lu et al. recently reported a cardiac targeting peptide (CTP; 12-amino acid sequence APWHLSSQYSRT) conjugated to miR-106a (CTP–miR-106a), which reversed cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction in an angiotensin II/isoproterenol-induced mouse model of HF.2 This study builds on prior in vitro evidence demonstrating that CTP–miR-106a selectively attenuates phenylephrine- and angiotensin II-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, with preferential uptake over the human embryonic kidney 293 cell line, cardiac fibroblasts and endothelial cells.3

Following intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg of the dual-reporter construct Cy5.5–CTP–miR-106a–Cy3, which is linked via a disulphide bond cleavable by endogenous reductases to release Cy5.5–CTP and miR-106a–Cy3, cardiac expression of miR-106a peaked at 30 min post-injection.2 This was accompanied by tissue-level expression of the miR-106a–Cy3 reporter. The Cy5.5–CTP moiety was subsequently expelled from the myocardium within 3.5 h and cleared via hepatic and renal pathways. In contrast, miR-106a–Cy3 remained upregulated in cardiac tissue at 3.5 h, and elevated miR-106a mRNA levels persisted up to 7 days. Importantly, neither miR-106a–Cy3 nor miR-106a gene expression was detected in the liver, kidney or lung, suggesting cardiac-specific uptake. However, this observation contrasts with earlier studies by the same group, in which mice injected with 10 mg/kg of Cy5.5–CTP alone (without miR-106a moiety) exhibited robust and peak uptake in the liver and kidney as early as 15 min post-injection.4 This uptake paralleled the observations in the heart but declined more slowly, indicating delayed clearance.

Despite these findings, the precise mechanisms underlying CTP's cardiac specificity remain unclear. It is unknown whether uptake occurs via a dedicated membrane receptor or through receptor-independent transduction and endocytosis pathways.5 Similarly, the mechanism responsible for the subsequent expulsion of the CTP moiety from cardiomyocytes is not well understood. Preliminary findings suggest that the potassium voltage-gated channel KCNH5 may be involved in CTP transduction and uptake4; however, definitive evidence from cardiomyocyte-specific knock-out or non-cardiomyocyte knock-in models are lacking. Notably, the same group reported minimal toxicity following a single dose of CTP. No significant effects were observed on key ion channels responsible for electrical conduction in cardiomyocytes in vitro, nor were there any overt adverse effects on haematological and blood chemistry parameters, blood pressure or magnetic resonance imaging-based cardiac function.6 Collectively, these findings support a favourable safety profile for the CTP delivery system.

While this novel therapeutic delivery system suggests a promising cardiac-targeted application of miR-106a for HF, these findings contrast with earlier studies demonstrating pathogenic roles of miR-106a in cardiac disease. Guan et al. reported that miR-106a contributes to cardiac hypertrophy in a transverse aortic constriction model of pressure overload in mice, as well as in angiotensin II-treated cardiomyocytes. This effect was mediated through direct targeting of mitofusin 2, thereby modulating mitochondrial dynamics by impairing the fusion process.7 Similarly, Hao et al. identified a pathogenic role of endogenous miR-106a upregulation in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, which could be attenuated by the long non-coding RNA FGD5-AS1 via activation of SMAD5.8 The reasons underlying the apparent complexity and conflicting roles of miR-106a across studies remain unclear. Potential contributing factors include differences in bioavailability among delivery systems, cell- versus organ-specific targeting, endogenous expression versus exogenous administration of miR-106a, and the pathological distinctions between cardiac disease models. Further investigations using both miR-106a mimics and inhibitors are warranted to elucidate these pleiotropic effects and to clarify its therapeutic potential (Figure 1).

In patients with acute HF, plasma levels of miR-106a have been reported to be downregulated, exhibiting negative correlations with NT-proBNP and hs-CRP levels, which are two well-established biomarkers of HF severity.9, 10 This inverse relationship suggests a potential protective role of miR-106a in modulating hemodynamic stress and inflammation, thereby supporting the rationale for exogenous restoration as a therapeutic strategy. However, conflicting evidence exists: upregulation of miR-106a has also been reported in the serum of patients with acute myocardial infarction,8 challenging the therapeutic premise of supplementation in the context of impaired cardiac function and subsequent HF. Beyond cardiovascular disease, miR-106a is frequently dysregulated across a spectrum of malignancies and non-cancer pathologies,11 with evidence supporting both tumour-suppressive and oncogenic roles. These inconsistencies, both in miR-106 expression patterns and detection methodologies, even within studies of the same disease, complicate its clinical translation. Given its inclusion in the proto-oncogenic miR-106a-363 cluster, the potential for oncogenic activation following chronic overexpression or sustained cardiac delivery of miR-106a warrants careful investigation. Addressing this risk is essential before advancing miR-106a-based therapies towards clinical application.

It is increasingly evident that miRNAs play a crucial role in regulating cardiac hypertrophy and failure development, yet the mechanistic underpinnings and translational potential for such targeted therapy remain incompletely understood. Advances in deep RNA sequencing and bioinformatics have significantly expanded our ability to profile miRNA landscapes in detail and infer functional networks in HF. As more direct mRNA targets of miRNAs are experimentally validated, systems-level pathway analysis will be critical to unravel the complex and context-dependent roles of miRNAs in cardiac remodelling. In this light, miR-106a exemplifies a paradox: its downregulation in acute HF suggests a protective role against hemodynamic stress and inflammation, while its upregulation in myocardial infarction and potential oncogenic activity within the miR-106a∼363 cluster raises concerns about unintended consequences of therapeutic restoration. Resolving this duality—between hypertrophic regression and proliferative risk—will require integrative studies that span cardiac, inflammatory and oncogenic signalling axes, before miR-106a-based interventions can be safely introduced into the clinic.

W.-W.L. conceptualized, visualized, wrote and edited the manuscript.

The author declares that he has no known competing commercial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported here.

Ethics approval and informed consent are not applicable to this article as the commentary was conducted based on available publications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信