基于机器学习的双能CT元素分解方法及其对碳离子治疗的物理-生物影响

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-09-10 DOI:10.1002/mp.18082
Yan Li, Weiguang Li, Chao Yang, Shutong Yu, Cheng Chang, Chong Xu, Mingqing Wang, Kai-Wen Li, Li-Sheng Geng, Yibao Zhang
{"title":"基于机器学习的双能CT元素分解方法及其对碳离子治疗的物理-生物影响","authors":"Yan Li,&nbsp;Weiguang Li,&nbsp;Chao Yang,&nbsp;Shutong Yu,&nbsp;Cheng Chang,&nbsp;Chong Xu,&nbsp;Mingqing Wang,&nbsp;Kai-Wen Li,&nbsp;Li-Sheng Geng,&nbsp;Yibao Zhang","doi":"10.1002/mp.18082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) enhances material differentiation by leveraging energy-dependent attenuation properties particularly for carbon ion therapy. Accurate estimation of tissue elemental composition via DECT can improve quantification of physical and biological doses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study proposed a novel machine-learning-based DECT (ML-DECT) method to predict the physical density and mass ratios of H, C, N, O, P, and Ca. The physical and biological impacts on carbon ion therapy was also investigated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Taking DECT-derived CT numbers as inputs, a fully connected neural network was employed to predict the physical density or the elemental mass ratio. The training and testing utilized a dataset of 85 biological tissues with data augmentation. The prediction accuracy and noise analysis were compared against the parameterization DECT (PA-DECT) and SECT methods. By applying the proposed method on the DECT images of 10 head-and-neck patients, the physical and biological doses as well as the linear energy transfer (LET) were calculated for a set of carbon ion pencil beams using Monte-Carlo simulations. Patient-based results were compared with the PA-DECT method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The ML-DECT method yielded <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>0.9996</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>${R}^2 = 0.9996$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for physical density and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>0.8338</mn>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n <mn>0.9997</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>${R}^2 = 0.8338\\sim 0.9997$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for the six elemental mass ratios across 85 materials. Compared to the PA-DECT and SECT methods, the accuracy was improved by over 20% and 50%; the noise robustness was improved by over three times and up to 25%, respectively. In the patient dose evaluation, the ML-DECT method yielded comparable physical and biological doses, yet up to ∼1% higher LET, and up to ∼2 mm shallower peak positions than those of the PA-DECT method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The ML-DECT method provided precise estimation of physical density and elemental mass ratios of human tissues. Compared with the PA-DECT method, the ML-DECT method displayed stronger robustness to image noise.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A machine learning based dual-energy CT elemental decomposition method and its physical-biological impacts on carbon ion therapy\",\"authors\":\"Yan Li,&nbsp;Weiguang Li,&nbsp;Chao Yang,&nbsp;Shutong Yu,&nbsp;Cheng Chang,&nbsp;Chong Xu,&nbsp;Mingqing Wang,&nbsp;Kai-Wen Li,&nbsp;Li-Sheng Geng,&nbsp;Yibao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.18082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) enhances material differentiation by leveraging energy-dependent attenuation properties particularly for carbon ion therapy. Accurate estimation of tissue elemental composition via DECT can improve quantification of physical and biological doses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study proposed a novel machine-learning-based DECT (ML-DECT) method to predict the physical density and mass ratios of H, C, N, O, P, and Ca. The physical and biological impacts on carbon ion therapy was also investigated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Taking DECT-derived CT numbers as inputs, a fully connected neural network was employed to predict the physical density or the elemental mass ratio. The training and testing utilized a dataset of 85 biological tissues with data augmentation. The prediction accuracy and noise analysis were compared against the parameterization DECT (PA-DECT) and SECT methods. By applying the proposed method on the DECT images of 10 head-and-neck patients, the physical and biological doses as well as the linear energy transfer (LET) were calculated for a set of carbon ion pencil beams using Monte-Carlo simulations. Patient-based results were compared with the PA-DECT method.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The ML-DECT method yielded <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msup>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mn>0.9996</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>${R}^2 = 0.9996$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> for physical density and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msup>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mn>0.8338</mn>\\n <mo>∼</mo>\\n <mn>0.9997</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>${R}^2 = 0.8338\\\\sim 0.9997$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> for the six elemental mass ratios across 85 materials. Compared to the PA-DECT and SECT methods, the accuracy was improved by over 20% and 50%; the noise robustness was improved by over three times and up to 25%, respectively. In the patient dose evaluation, the ML-DECT method yielded comparable physical and biological doses, yet up to ∼1% higher LET, and up to ∼2 mm shallower peak positions than those of the PA-DECT method.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The ML-DECT method provided precise estimation of physical density and elemental mass ratios of human tissues. Compared with the PA-DECT method, the ML-DECT method displayed stronger robustness to image noise.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\"52 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.18082\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.18082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)通过利用能量依赖的衰减特性来增强材料分化,特别是在碳离子治疗中。通过DECT准确估计组织元素组成可以提高物理和生物剂量的定量。目的提出了一种新的基于机器学习的DECT (ML-DECT)方法来预测H、C、N、O、P和Ca的物理密度和质量比,并研究了碳离子治疗的物理和生物影响。方法以dect衍生的CT数为输入,采用全连接神经网络预测物理密度或元素质量比。训练和测试利用了85个生物组织的数据集,并进行了数据增强。并与参数化DECT (PA-DECT)和SECT方法进行了预测精度和噪声分析比较。将该方法应用于10例头颈部患者的DECT图像,通过蒙特卡罗模拟计算了一组碳离子铅笔束的物理剂量和生物剂量以及线性能量传递(LET)。将基于患者的结果与PA-DECT方法进行比较。结果ML-DECT方法的物理密度和r2均为r2 = 0.9996$ {R}^2 = 0.9996$= 0.8338 ~ 0.9997$ {R}^2 = 0.8338\sim 0.9997$。与PA-DECT和SECT方法相比,准确率分别提高了20%和50%以上;噪声鲁棒性分别提高了三倍以上和25%。在患者剂量评估中,ML-DECT方法产生的物理和生物剂量相当,但LET比PA-DECT方法高1%,峰位比PA-DECT方法浅2mm。结论ML-DECT方法能准确估计人体组织的物理密度和元素质量比。与PA-DECT方法相比,ML-DECT方法对图像噪声具有更强的鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A machine learning based dual-energy CT elemental decomposition method and its physical-biological impacts on carbon ion therapy

A machine learning based dual-energy CT elemental decomposition method and its physical-biological impacts on carbon ion therapy

A machine learning based dual-energy CT elemental decomposition method and its physical-biological impacts on carbon ion therapy

Background

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) enhances material differentiation by leveraging energy-dependent attenuation properties particularly for carbon ion therapy. Accurate estimation of tissue elemental composition via DECT can improve quantification of physical and biological doses.

Objective

This study proposed a novel machine-learning-based DECT (ML-DECT) method to predict the physical density and mass ratios of H, C, N, O, P, and Ca. The physical and biological impacts on carbon ion therapy was also investigated.

Methods

Taking DECT-derived CT numbers as inputs, a fully connected neural network was employed to predict the physical density or the elemental mass ratio. The training and testing utilized a dataset of 85 biological tissues with data augmentation. The prediction accuracy and noise analysis were compared against the parameterization DECT (PA-DECT) and SECT methods. By applying the proposed method on the DECT images of 10 head-and-neck patients, the physical and biological doses as well as the linear energy transfer (LET) were calculated for a set of carbon ion pencil beams using Monte-Carlo simulations. Patient-based results were compared with the PA-DECT method.

Results

The ML-DECT method yielded R 2 = 0.9996 ${R}^2 = 0.9996$ for physical density and R 2 = 0.8338 0.9997 ${R}^2 = 0.8338\sim 0.9997$ for the six elemental mass ratios across 85 materials. Compared to the PA-DECT and SECT methods, the accuracy was improved by over 20% and 50%; the noise robustness was improved by over three times and up to 25%, respectively. In the patient dose evaluation, the ML-DECT method yielded comparable physical and biological doses, yet up to ∼1% higher LET, and up to ∼2 mm shallower peak positions than those of the PA-DECT method.

Conclusion

The ML-DECT method provided precise estimation of physical density and elemental mass ratios of human tissues. Compared with the PA-DECT method, the ML-DECT method displayed stronger robustness to image noise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信