Mateb Al Khalifa, Tianjun Ma, Haya Aljuaid, Siyong Kim, William Y. Song
{"title":"在单一机构使用标准临床TRUFI序列在0.35T MR-linac上进行四个商业MRI幻象的临床比较","authors":"Mateb Al Khalifa, Tianjun Ma, Haya Aljuaid, Siyong Kim, William Y. Song","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Real‑time magnetic resonance–guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) integrates MRI with a linear accelerator (Linac) for gating and adaptive radiotherapy, which requires robust image‑quality assurance over a large field of view (FOV). Specialized phantoms capable of accommodating this extensive FOV are therefore essential. This study compares the performance of four commercial MRI phantoms on a 0.35 T MR‑Linac.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four phantoms: the IBA QUASAR Insight Phantom, the IBA QUASAR MRID<sup>3D</sup> Geometric Distortion Phantom, the MagPhan Phantom, and the Sun Nuclear Large Field MRI Distortion Phantom, were evaluated on a 0.35 T MR-Linac using the TRUFI clinical sequence. Mean distortions were measured at gantry angles from 0° to 360° in 30° increments. Clinical imaging parameters (signal-to-noise ratio, uniformity, resolution via modulation transfer function, laser alignment, and twist) were also assessed where applicable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The QUASAR MRID<sup>3D</sup> Phantom enabled separate quantification of B<sub>0</sub> and gradient-induced distortions but showed a notable vertical offset, which did not affect comparisons with other phantoms. Both the MagPhan and QUASAR Insight phantoms provided mean distortion measurements as well as additional imaging parameters (e.g., signal-to-noise ratio, uniformity, resolution). The Sun Nuclear Phantom exhibited higher overall distortion values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>All four phantoms successfully measured distortion at multiple gantry angles on a 0.35 T MR-Linac. The QUASAR MRID<sup>3D</sup> Phantom uniquely differentiated B<sub>0</sub> from gradient distortions but required an offset adjustment. The MagPhan and QUASAR Insight phantoms offered comprehensive imaging metrics, while the Sun Nuclear Phantom exhibited relatively higher distortions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70247","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical comparison of four commercial MRI phantoms on a 0.35T MR-linac using a standard clinical TRUFI sequence at a single institution\",\"authors\":\"Mateb Al Khalifa, Tianjun Ma, Haya Aljuaid, Siyong Kim, William Y. Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Real‑time magnetic resonance–guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) integrates MRI with a linear accelerator (Linac) for gating and adaptive radiotherapy, which requires robust image‑quality assurance over a large field of view (FOV). Specialized phantoms capable of accommodating this extensive FOV are therefore essential. This study compares the performance of four commercial MRI phantoms on a 0.35 T MR‑Linac.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Four phantoms: the IBA QUASAR Insight Phantom, the IBA QUASAR MRID<sup>3D</sup> Geometric Distortion Phantom, the MagPhan Phantom, and the Sun Nuclear Large Field MRI Distortion Phantom, were evaluated on a 0.35 T MR-Linac using the TRUFI clinical sequence. Mean distortions were measured at gantry angles from 0° to 360° in 30° increments. Clinical imaging parameters (signal-to-noise ratio, uniformity, resolution via modulation transfer function, laser alignment, and twist) were also assessed where applicable.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The QUASAR MRID<sup>3D</sup> Phantom enabled separate quantification of B<sub>0</sub> and gradient-induced distortions but showed a notable vertical offset, which did not affect comparisons with other phantoms. Both the MagPhan and QUASAR Insight phantoms provided mean distortion measurements as well as additional imaging parameters (e.g., signal-to-noise ratio, uniformity, resolution). The Sun Nuclear Phantom exhibited higher overall distortion values.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>All four phantoms successfully measured distortion at multiple gantry angles on a 0.35 T MR-Linac. The QUASAR MRID<sup>3D</sup> Phantom uniquely differentiated B<sub>0</sub> from gradient distortions but required an offset adjustment. The MagPhan and QUASAR Insight phantoms offered comprehensive imaging metrics, while the Sun Nuclear Phantom exhibited relatively higher distortions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70247\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70247\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
实时磁共振引导放射治疗(MRgRT)将MRI与线性加速器(Linac)集成在一起,用于门控和自适应放射治疗,这需要在大视场(FOV)上保证强大的图像质量。因此,能够适应这种大视场的专用幻影是必不可少的。本研究比较了四种商用MRI模型在0.35 T MR - Linac上的性能。方法采用TRUFI临床序列,在0.35 T MR-Linac上对IBA QUASAR Insight幻影、IBA QUASAR mrrid3d几何畸变幻影、MagPhan幻影和Sun核大视场MRI畸变幻影进行评价。平均畸变测量在龙门角度从0°到360°在30°增量。临床成像参数(信噪比、均匀性、通过调制传递函数的分辨率、激光对准和扭转)也在适用的情况下进行评估。结果QUASAR MRID3D幻影可以单独量化B0和梯度引起的畸变,但显示出明显的垂直偏移,这并不影响与其他幻影的比较。MagPhan和QUASAR Insight幻影都提供了平均失真测量以及额外的成像参数(例如,信噪比、均匀性、分辨率)。太阳核幻影显示出更高的整体扭曲值。结论在0.35 T MR-Linac上,4个模型均成功测量了多个龙门角度的畸变。QUASAR MRID3D Phantom独特地将B0与梯度扭曲区分开来,但需要进行偏移调整。MagPhan和QUASAR Insight幻影提供了全面的成像指标,而太阳核幻影表现出相对较高的扭曲。
Clinical comparison of four commercial MRI phantoms on a 0.35T MR-linac using a standard clinical TRUFI sequence at a single institution
Purpose
Real‑time magnetic resonance–guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) integrates MRI with a linear accelerator (Linac) for gating and adaptive radiotherapy, which requires robust image‑quality assurance over a large field of view (FOV). Specialized phantoms capable of accommodating this extensive FOV are therefore essential. This study compares the performance of four commercial MRI phantoms on a 0.35 T MR‑Linac.
Methods
Four phantoms: the IBA QUASAR Insight Phantom, the IBA QUASAR MRID3D Geometric Distortion Phantom, the MagPhan Phantom, and the Sun Nuclear Large Field MRI Distortion Phantom, were evaluated on a 0.35 T MR-Linac using the TRUFI clinical sequence. Mean distortions were measured at gantry angles from 0° to 360° in 30° increments. Clinical imaging parameters (signal-to-noise ratio, uniformity, resolution via modulation transfer function, laser alignment, and twist) were also assessed where applicable.
Results
The QUASAR MRID3D Phantom enabled separate quantification of B0 and gradient-induced distortions but showed a notable vertical offset, which did not affect comparisons with other phantoms. Both the MagPhan and QUASAR Insight phantoms provided mean distortion measurements as well as additional imaging parameters (e.g., signal-to-noise ratio, uniformity, resolution). The Sun Nuclear Phantom exhibited higher overall distortion values.
Conclusion
All four phantoms successfully measured distortion at multiple gantry angles on a 0.35 T MR-Linac. The QUASAR MRID3D Phantom uniquely differentiated B0 from gradient distortions but required an offset adjustment. The MagPhan and QUASAR Insight phantoms offered comprehensive imaging metrics, while the Sun Nuclear Phantom exhibited relatively higher distortions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic