FRP-RC梁抗剪承载力:XML建模与可靠性评估

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Abouzar Jafari , Amir Ali Shahmansouri , Arsam Taslimi , M.Z. Naser , Ying Zhou
{"title":"FRP-RC梁抗剪承载力:XML建模与可靠性评估","authors":"Abouzar Jafari ,&nbsp;Amir Ali Shahmansouri ,&nbsp;Arsam Taslimi ,&nbsp;M.Z. Naser ,&nbsp;Ying Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The accurate prediction of the shear capacity of concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars remains a significant challenge due to the distinct mechanical characteristics of FRP, including its linear-elastic behavior and relatively low stiffness compared to steel. To address this, the present study develops two machine learning (ML)-based solutions—a practical multilayer perceptron (MLP) model with a minimalist structure and an enhanced MLP model—for predicting the shear capacity of FRP-RC beams reinforced with both longitudinal FRP bars and FRP stirrups. A curated dataset of 144 experimental tests conducted between 1993 and 2021 was used for model development and validation. Both models achieved superior predictive accuracy compared to existing empirical equations, with goodness-of-fit values of 0.93 and 0.97 and root mean square errors of 27.5 kN and 14.5 kN, respectively, while avoiding systematic over- or underestimation. Feature ranking and sensitivity analysis showed that beam dimensions (effective depth and width) have the strongest positive correlations with shear capacity (0.90 and 0.65). The FRP stirrup ratio and bend radius-to-diameter ratio also influence shear capacity (around 0.45), while the span-to-depth ratio has a moderate negative correlation (–0.51), consistent with the mechanics of FRP-RC beams. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that beam section dimensions, span-to-depth ratio, and FRP stirrup properties are the most influential input variables. The enhanced MLP model captured more complex feature interactions, while the practical model preserved interpretability and is better suited for design applications. Reliability analysis performed using Monte Carlo simulation showed that the practical model has a lower probability of failure (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>P</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> = 0.0035) compared to the enhanced model (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>P</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>= 0.045), indicating its conservative and robust nature. Sensitivity reliability analysis highlighted variations in beam dimensions, FRP stirrup properties, and concrete compressive strength significantly affect structural reliability, providing useful insights for design optimization. Overall, the proposed solutions offer accurate, interpretable, and robust tools for predicting the shear capacity of FRP-RC beams, with promising applications in structural design and safety assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 110150"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shear capacity of FRP-RC beams: XML modeling and reliability evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Abouzar Jafari ,&nbsp;Amir Ali Shahmansouri ,&nbsp;Arsam Taslimi ,&nbsp;M.Z. Naser ,&nbsp;Ying Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The accurate prediction of the shear capacity of concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars remains a significant challenge due to the distinct mechanical characteristics of FRP, including its linear-elastic behavior and relatively low stiffness compared to steel. To address this, the present study develops two machine learning (ML)-based solutions—a practical multilayer perceptron (MLP) model with a minimalist structure and an enhanced MLP model—for predicting the shear capacity of FRP-RC beams reinforced with both longitudinal FRP bars and FRP stirrups. A curated dataset of 144 experimental tests conducted between 1993 and 2021 was used for model development and validation. Both models achieved superior predictive accuracy compared to existing empirical equations, with goodness-of-fit values of 0.93 and 0.97 and root mean square errors of 27.5 kN and 14.5 kN, respectively, while avoiding systematic over- or underestimation. Feature ranking and sensitivity analysis showed that beam dimensions (effective depth and width) have the strongest positive correlations with shear capacity (0.90 and 0.65). The FRP stirrup ratio and bend radius-to-diameter ratio also influence shear capacity (around 0.45), while the span-to-depth ratio has a moderate negative correlation (–0.51), consistent with the mechanics of FRP-RC beams. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that beam section dimensions, span-to-depth ratio, and FRP stirrup properties are the most influential input variables. The enhanced MLP model captured more complex feature interactions, while the practical model preserved interpretability and is better suited for design applications. Reliability analysis performed using Monte Carlo simulation showed that the practical model has a lower probability of failure (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>P</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> = 0.0035) compared to the enhanced model (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>P</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>= 0.045), indicating its conservative and robust nature. Sensitivity reliability analysis highlighted variations in beam dimensions, FRP stirrup properties, and concrete compressive strength significantly affect structural reliability, providing useful insights for design optimization. Overall, the proposed solutions offer accurate, interpretable, and robust tools for predicting the shear capacity of FRP-RC beams, with promising applications in structural design and safety assessment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structures\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425019654\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425019654","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

FRP筋混凝土梁的抗剪能力的准确预测仍然是一个重大的挑战,因为FRP的独特的力学特性,包括其线弹性行为和相对较低的刚度与钢相比。为了解决这个问题,本研究开发了两种基于机器学习(ML)的解决方案——一种具有极简结构的实用多层感知器(MLP)模型和一种增强的MLP模型——用于预测使用FRP筋和FRP箍筋加固的FRP- rc梁的抗剪能力。在1993年至2021年期间进行的144次实验测试的策划数据集用于模型开发和验证。与现有的经验方程相比,这两个模型的预测精度更高,拟合优度分别为0.93和0.97,均方根误差分别为27.5 kN和14.5 kN,同时避免了系统的高估或低估。特征排序和敏感性分析表明,梁的尺寸(有效深度和宽度)与抗剪能力的正相关性最强(分别为0.90和0.65)。FRP箍筋比和弯曲半径直径比也影响抗剪能力(约0.45),而跨深比有适度的负相关(-0.51),与FRP- rc梁的力学一致。SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析显示,梁截面尺寸、跨深比和FRP箍筋性能是影响最大的输入变量。增强的MLP模型捕获了更复杂的特征交互,而实际模型保留了可解释性,更适合设计应用。通过蒙特卡罗仿真进行的可靠性分析表明,与增强模型(Pf= 0.045)相比,实用模型的失效概率(Pf= 0.0035)较低,表明了其保守性和鲁棒性。灵敏度可靠性分析强调了梁尺寸、FRP箍筋性能和混凝土抗压强度的变化对结构可靠性的影响,为设计优化提供了有用的见解。总的来说,提出的解决方案为预测FRP-RC梁的抗剪能力提供了准确、可解释和强大的工具,在结构设计和安全评估中具有广阔的应用前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shear capacity of FRP-RC beams: XML modeling and reliability evaluation
The accurate prediction of the shear capacity of concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars remains a significant challenge due to the distinct mechanical characteristics of FRP, including its linear-elastic behavior and relatively low stiffness compared to steel. To address this, the present study develops two machine learning (ML)-based solutions—a practical multilayer perceptron (MLP) model with a minimalist structure and an enhanced MLP model—for predicting the shear capacity of FRP-RC beams reinforced with both longitudinal FRP bars and FRP stirrups. A curated dataset of 144 experimental tests conducted between 1993 and 2021 was used for model development and validation. Both models achieved superior predictive accuracy compared to existing empirical equations, with goodness-of-fit values of 0.93 and 0.97 and root mean square errors of 27.5 kN and 14.5 kN, respectively, while avoiding systematic over- or underestimation. Feature ranking and sensitivity analysis showed that beam dimensions (effective depth and width) have the strongest positive correlations with shear capacity (0.90 and 0.65). The FRP stirrup ratio and bend radius-to-diameter ratio also influence shear capacity (around 0.45), while the span-to-depth ratio has a moderate negative correlation (–0.51), consistent with the mechanics of FRP-RC beams. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that beam section dimensions, span-to-depth ratio, and FRP stirrup properties are the most influential input variables. The enhanced MLP model captured more complex feature interactions, while the practical model preserved interpretability and is better suited for design applications. Reliability analysis performed using Monte Carlo simulation showed that the practical model has a lower probability of failure (Pf = 0.0035) compared to the enhanced model (Pf= 0.045), indicating its conservative and robust nature. Sensitivity reliability analysis highlighted variations in beam dimensions, FRP stirrup properties, and concrete compressive strength significantly affect structural reliability, providing useful insights for design optimization. Overall, the proposed solutions offer accurate, interpretable, and robust tools for predicting the shear capacity of FRP-RC beams, with promising applications in structural design and safety assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信