利用火灾强度和机载激光扫描数据在景观水平上预测火灾引起的树木单株死亡率

IF 11.4 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Aaron M. Sparks , Ryan Armstrong , Alistair M.S. Smith , Steve Scharosch , Mark V. Corrao , Thomas Montzka
{"title":"利用火灾强度和机载激光扫描数据在景观水平上预测火灾引起的树木单株死亡率","authors":"Aaron M. Sparks ,&nbsp;Ryan Armstrong ,&nbsp;Alistair M.S. Smith ,&nbsp;Steve Scharosch ,&nbsp;Mark V. Corrao ,&nbsp;Thomas Montzka","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2025.115007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prediction of fire-induced tree mortality is important for evaluating potential timber volume losses, replanting costs, and for assessing how mortality will impact long-term yield and carbon dynamics. However, current methods do not provide spatially explicit predictions, limiting the use of this data for proactive forest management, such as thinning and reducing fuel load to reduce tree mortality. In this study we assess whether the incorporation of individual tree inventory data derived from airborne laser scanning and modeled and observed fire intensity data can provide accurate spatially explicit tree mortality predictions. Specifically, tree-level mortality was predicted for over 1.9 million trees within six wildfires in mixed coniferous forest in northwestern Montana, USA, and validated using high resolution imagery for each segmented tree crown. Random forest classification models utilizing observed fire intensity metrics derived from VIIRS observations were the most accurate (overall accuracy: 77.2 %), followed by random forest classification models utilizing modeled fire intensity (64.5–66.1 %) and those that utilized existing logistic regression relationships (55.7–59.0 %). The random forest tree mortality models also produced lower RMSE (6.3–10.2 %) and bias (1.7–3.7 %) compared to the logistic regression approach (RMSE: 38.4 %, bias: −29.6 %) when mortality accuracy was assessed across tree size class. The predictor variable importance quantification showed that fire intensity metrics were more important than species and structural variables in the mortality classification. Ultimately, this study contributes to the remote sensing of fire effects and fire science fields by developing a remote sensing-based methodology for predicting spatially explicit individual tree mortality across large spatial extents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":417,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing of Environment","volume":"331 ","pages":"Article 115007"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting fire-induced individual tree mortality at the landscape level using fire intensity and airborne laser scanning data\",\"authors\":\"Aaron M. Sparks ,&nbsp;Ryan Armstrong ,&nbsp;Alistair M.S. Smith ,&nbsp;Steve Scharosch ,&nbsp;Mark V. Corrao ,&nbsp;Thomas Montzka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rse.2025.115007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The prediction of fire-induced tree mortality is important for evaluating potential timber volume losses, replanting costs, and for assessing how mortality will impact long-term yield and carbon dynamics. However, current methods do not provide spatially explicit predictions, limiting the use of this data for proactive forest management, such as thinning and reducing fuel load to reduce tree mortality. In this study we assess whether the incorporation of individual tree inventory data derived from airborne laser scanning and modeled and observed fire intensity data can provide accurate spatially explicit tree mortality predictions. Specifically, tree-level mortality was predicted for over 1.9 million trees within six wildfires in mixed coniferous forest in northwestern Montana, USA, and validated using high resolution imagery for each segmented tree crown. Random forest classification models utilizing observed fire intensity metrics derived from VIIRS observations were the most accurate (overall accuracy: 77.2 %), followed by random forest classification models utilizing modeled fire intensity (64.5–66.1 %) and those that utilized existing logistic regression relationships (55.7–59.0 %). The random forest tree mortality models also produced lower RMSE (6.3–10.2 %) and bias (1.7–3.7 %) compared to the logistic regression approach (RMSE: 38.4 %, bias: −29.6 %) when mortality accuracy was assessed across tree size class. The predictor variable importance quantification showed that fire intensity metrics were more important than species and structural variables in the mortality classification. Ultimately, this study contributes to the remote sensing of fire effects and fire science fields by developing a remote sensing-based methodology for predicting spatially explicit individual tree mortality across large spatial extents.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"volume\":\"331 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425725004110\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing of Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425725004110","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测火灾引起的树木死亡率对于评估潜在的木材量损失、重新种植成本以及评估树木死亡率如何影响长期产量和碳动态具有重要意义。然而,目前的方法不能提供空间上明确的预测,限制了这些数据用于主动森林管理的使用,如间伐和减少燃料负荷以降低树木死亡率。在本研究中,我们评估了将机载激光扫描得出的树木清查数据与模拟和观测到的火灾强度数据结合起来是否可以提供准确的树木死亡率空间预测。具体而言,预测了美国蒙大拿州西北部混合针叶林六次野火中超过190万棵树的树木死亡率,并使用每个分割树冠的高分辨率图像进行了验证。利用VIIRS观测得到的火灾强度指标的随机森林分类模型最准确(总准确率为77.2%),其次是利用模拟火灾强度的随机森林分类模型(64.5 - 66.1%)和利用现有逻辑回归关系的随机森林分类模型(55.7 - 59.0%)。与逻辑回归方法(RMSE: 38.4%, bias:−29.6%)相比,随机森林树木死亡率模型在评估树木大小类别的死亡率准确性时也产生了更低的RMSE(6.3 - 10.2%)和偏差(1.7 - 3.7%)。预测变量重要性量化表明,在死亡率分类中,火灾强度指标比物种和结构变量更重要。最终,本研究通过开发一种基于遥感的方法来预测大空间范围内空间明确的单株树木死亡率,为火灾效应和火灾科学领域的遥感做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting fire-induced individual tree mortality at the landscape level using fire intensity and airborne laser scanning data
The prediction of fire-induced tree mortality is important for evaluating potential timber volume losses, replanting costs, and for assessing how mortality will impact long-term yield and carbon dynamics. However, current methods do not provide spatially explicit predictions, limiting the use of this data for proactive forest management, such as thinning and reducing fuel load to reduce tree mortality. In this study we assess whether the incorporation of individual tree inventory data derived from airborne laser scanning and modeled and observed fire intensity data can provide accurate spatially explicit tree mortality predictions. Specifically, tree-level mortality was predicted for over 1.9 million trees within six wildfires in mixed coniferous forest in northwestern Montana, USA, and validated using high resolution imagery for each segmented tree crown. Random forest classification models utilizing observed fire intensity metrics derived from VIIRS observations were the most accurate (overall accuracy: 77.2 %), followed by random forest classification models utilizing modeled fire intensity (64.5–66.1 %) and those that utilized existing logistic regression relationships (55.7–59.0 %). The random forest tree mortality models also produced lower RMSE (6.3–10.2 %) and bias (1.7–3.7 %) compared to the logistic regression approach (RMSE: 38.4 %, bias: −29.6 %) when mortality accuracy was assessed across tree size class. The predictor variable importance quantification showed that fire intensity metrics were more important than species and structural variables in the mortality classification. Ultimately, this study contributes to the remote sensing of fire effects and fire science fields by developing a remote sensing-based methodology for predicting spatially explicit individual tree mortality across large spatial extents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Remote Sensing of Environment
Remote Sensing of Environment 环境科学-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
8.90%
发文量
455
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Remote Sensing of Environment (RSE) serves the Earth observation community by disseminating results on the theory, science, applications, and technology that contribute to advancing the field of remote sensing. With a thoroughly interdisciplinary approach, RSE encompasses terrestrial, oceanic, and atmospheric sensing. The journal emphasizes biophysical and quantitative approaches to remote sensing at local to global scales, covering a diverse range of applications and techniques. RSE serves as a vital platform for the exchange of knowledge and advancements in the dynamic field of remote sensing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信