当另一边看起来更环保时,为什么要留下来:探索中国农村专业化村庄的居民留在那里的意愿

IF 7 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Isaac Sarfo , Jiajun Qiao , Gibbson Adu-Gyamfi , Qiankun Zhu , Emmanuel Yeboah , George Darko , Augustine Ohene Kofi Nyarko Mensah
{"title":"当另一边看起来更环保时,为什么要留下来:探索中国农村专业化村庄的居民留在那里的意愿","authors":"Isaac Sarfo ,&nbsp;Jiajun Qiao ,&nbsp;Gibbson Adu-Gyamfi ,&nbsp;Qiankun Zhu ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Yeboah ,&nbsp;George Darko ,&nbsp;Augustine Ohene Kofi Nyarko Mensah","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rural China faces unprecedented challenges of depopulation and sustainability, threatening the success of national revitalization strategies. Specialized villages (SVs)—economic engines driving rural development—are central to this effort, yet their long-term viability hinges on retaining residents. While existing research extensively maps SV formation, spatial distribution, and economic impacts, it neglects a critical question: What factors determine rural households' willingness to stay (WTS) in SVs? This study investigates the determinants of rural residents' WTS in SVs of China's Henan Province. By integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) with place identity (PI), quality of life (QoL), and participation and policy incentives (PPIs), 549 rural households across 20 SVs were surveyed. Findings revealed that perceived behavioral control and subjective norms are the strongest direct predictors of rural households' WTS. PI demonstrated dual effects—strengthening attachment attitudes while paradoxically limiting stay intention. QoL indirectly supports WTS by fostering PI but lacks direct influence. PPIs improved attitudes, but were instrumental in impacting willingness to stay directly. Our standpoints underscore that quality rural development and continuity require enhancing rural households' economic control and opportunities, and leveraging village networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 103566"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why stay when the other side seems greener: Exploring residents' willingness to stay in Rural China's specialized villages\",\"authors\":\"Isaac Sarfo ,&nbsp;Jiajun Qiao ,&nbsp;Gibbson Adu-Gyamfi ,&nbsp;Qiankun Zhu ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Yeboah ,&nbsp;George Darko ,&nbsp;Augustine Ohene Kofi Nyarko Mensah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rural China faces unprecedented challenges of depopulation and sustainability, threatening the success of national revitalization strategies. Specialized villages (SVs)—economic engines driving rural development—are central to this effort, yet their long-term viability hinges on retaining residents. While existing research extensively maps SV formation, spatial distribution, and economic impacts, it neglects a critical question: What factors determine rural households' willingness to stay (WTS) in SVs? This study investigates the determinants of rural residents' WTS in SVs of China's Henan Province. By integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) with place identity (PI), quality of life (QoL), and participation and policy incentives (PPIs), 549 rural households across 20 SVs were surveyed. Findings revealed that perceived behavioral control and subjective norms are the strongest direct predictors of rural households' WTS. PI demonstrated dual effects—strengthening attachment attitudes while paradoxically limiting stay intention. QoL indirectly supports WTS by fostering PI but lacks direct influence. PPIs improved attitudes, but were instrumental in impacting willingness to stay directly. Our standpoints underscore that quality rural development and continuity require enhancing rural households' economic control and opportunities, and leveraging village networks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Habitat International\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Habitat International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525002826\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525002826","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国农村面临着前所未有的人口减少和可持续发展的挑战,威胁着国家振兴战略的成功。作为推动农村发展的经济引擎,专业村(SVs)是这一努力的核心,但它们的长期生存能力取决于留住居民。虽然现有的研究广泛地描绘了SV的形成、空间分布和经济影响,但它忽略了一个关键问题:是什么因素决定了农村家庭留在SV的意愿?本研究旨在探讨河南省农村地区农村居民WTS的影响因素。通过将计划行为理论与地方认同(PI)、生活质量(QoL)、参与与政策激励(ppi)相结合,对20个sv的549户农户进行了调查。研究发现,农户行为控制知觉和主观规范是农户WTS最直接的预测因子。PI表现出双重效应——强化依恋态度,同时矛盾地限制停留意愿。生活质量通过培养PI间接支持WTS,但缺乏直接影响。ppi改善了态度,但在直接影响留下来的意愿方面起着重要作用。我们的立场强调,农村的高质量发展和持续性需要加强农户的经济控制和机会,并利用村庄网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why stay when the other side seems greener: Exploring residents' willingness to stay in Rural China's specialized villages
Rural China faces unprecedented challenges of depopulation and sustainability, threatening the success of national revitalization strategies. Specialized villages (SVs)—economic engines driving rural development—are central to this effort, yet their long-term viability hinges on retaining residents. While existing research extensively maps SV formation, spatial distribution, and economic impacts, it neglects a critical question: What factors determine rural households' willingness to stay (WTS) in SVs? This study investigates the determinants of rural residents' WTS in SVs of China's Henan Province. By integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) with place identity (PI), quality of life (QoL), and participation and policy incentives (PPIs), 549 rural households across 20 SVs were surveyed. Findings revealed that perceived behavioral control and subjective norms are the strongest direct predictors of rural households' WTS. PI demonstrated dual effects—strengthening attachment attitudes while paradoxically limiting stay intention. QoL indirectly supports WTS by fostering PI but lacks direct influence. PPIs improved attitudes, but were instrumental in impacting willingness to stay directly. Our standpoints underscore that quality rural development and continuity require enhancing rural households' economic control and opportunities, and leveraging village networks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信