一项回顾性研究:异步远程皮肤科减少了等待时间并保持了对扁平苔藓标准护理的高度依从性。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26924366251361365
Taylor L Duffy, Joseph C English
{"title":"一项回顾性研究:异步远程皮肤科减少了等待时间并保持了对扁平苔藓标准护理的高度依从性。","authors":"Taylor L Duffy, Joseph C English","doi":"10.1177/26924366251361365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis with limited teledermatology data guiding its management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether asynchronous teledermatology provides timely, guideline-adherent LP care comparable to in-person visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 102 LP patients seen via asynchronous teledermatology (<i>n</i> = 45) or in-person (<i>n</i> = 57) from 2020 to 2024. Variables included demographics, response time, diagnostic concordance, treatment, and follow-up compliance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Teledermatology provided rapid access (mean response time: 15 h) to dermatologic care. Diagnostic concordance between teledermatologists and in-person dermatologists was high (90.5%), while concordance with primary care providers was lower (18.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Teledermatologists followed LP care standards, including hepatitis C virus screening (91.1%) and topical corticosteroid initiation (90%). Black patients used eVisits more frequently than in-person care (38.9% vs. 8.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and follow-up compliance was lower among asynchronous patients (57.8% vs. 92.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Asynchronous teledermatology enables timely, high-quality LP care. However, strategies to improve follow-up are needed, particularly for younger teledermatology patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"179-184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asynchronous Teledermatology Reduces Wait Times and Maintains High Adherence to Standard Care for Lichen Planus: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Taylor L Duffy, Joseph C English\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26924366251361365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis with limited teledermatology data guiding its management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether asynchronous teledermatology provides timely, guideline-adherent LP care comparable to in-person visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 102 LP patients seen via asynchronous teledermatology (<i>n</i> = 45) or in-person (<i>n</i> = 57) from 2020 to 2024. Variables included demographics, response time, diagnostic concordance, treatment, and follow-up compliance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Teledermatology provided rapid access (mean response time: 15 h) to dermatologic care. Diagnostic concordance between teledermatologists and in-person dermatologists was high (90.5%), while concordance with primary care providers was lower (18.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Teledermatologists followed LP care standards, including hepatitis C virus screening (91.1%) and topical corticosteroid initiation (90%). Black patients used eVisits more frequently than in-person care (38.9% vs. 8.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and follow-up compliance was lower among asynchronous patients (57.8% vs. 92.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Asynchronous teledermatology enables timely, high-quality LP care. However, strategies to improve follow-up are needed, particularly for younger teledermatology patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"179-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411894/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26924366251361365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26924366251361365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:扁平苔藓(Lichen planus, LP)是一种慢性炎症性皮肤病,其临床治疗资料有限。目的:评估异步远程皮肤科是否提供及时的、遵循指南的LP护理,可与亲自就诊相媲美。方法:对2020年至2024年通过非同步远程皮肤科(n = 45)或当面就诊的102例LP患者(n = 57)进行回顾性研究。变量包括人口统计学、反应时间、诊断一致性、治疗和随访依从性。结果:远程皮肤科提供了快速的皮肤科护理(平均反应时间:15小时)。远程皮肤科医生和现场皮肤科医生的诊断一致性较高(90.5%),而与初级保健提供者的诊断一致性较低(18.5%,p < 0.001)。远程皮肤科医生遵循LP护理标准,包括丙型肝炎病毒筛查(91.1%)和局部皮质类固醇起始治疗(90%)。黑人患者的访视频率高于面对面护理(38.9%比8.8%,p < 0.01),非同步患者的随访依从性较低(57.8%比92.7%,p < 0.001)。结论:异步远程皮肤科能够实现及时、高质量的LP护理。然而,需要改善随访的策略,特别是对于年轻的远程皮肤病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asynchronous Teledermatology Reduces Wait Times and Maintains High Adherence to Standard Care for Lichen Planus: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis with limited teledermatology data guiding its management.

Objective: To assess whether asynchronous teledermatology provides timely, guideline-adherent LP care comparable to in-person visits.

Methods: A retrospective study of 102 LP patients seen via asynchronous teledermatology (n = 45) or in-person (n = 57) from 2020 to 2024. Variables included demographics, response time, diagnostic concordance, treatment, and follow-up compliance.

Results: Teledermatology provided rapid access (mean response time: 15 h) to dermatologic care. Diagnostic concordance between teledermatologists and in-person dermatologists was high (90.5%), while concordance with primary care providers was lower (18.5%, p < 0.001). Teledermatologists followed LP care standards, including hepatitis C virus screening (91.1%) and topical corticosteroid initiation (90%). Black patients used eVisits more frequently than in-person care (38.9% vs. 8.8%, p < 0.01), and follow-up compliance was lower among asynchronous patients (57.8% vs. 92.7%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Asynchronous teledermatology enables timely, high-quality LP care. However, strategies to improve follow-up are needed, particularly for younger teledermatology patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信