Yuval Avidan, Amir Aker, Razi Khoury, Baruch Weizman, Sameer Kassem
{"title":"多灶性房性心动过速在急诊科误诊为房颤的频率有多高?","authors":"Yuval Avidan, Amir Aker, Razi Khoury, Baruch Weizman, Sameer Kassem","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Multifocal atrial tachycardia (MAT), characterized by an irregularly irregular rhythm, is often regarded as a clinical imitator of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of MAT misclassification as AF in the emergency department (ED) setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 1828 ECGs from patients discharged with AF diagnoses over five years. All tracings were independently reviewed by three blinded cardiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MAT was identified in one case (0.05 %). Other misclassifications included atrial flutter (7.9 %), supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (1.6 %), and sinus rhythm with conduction disturbances, artifacts, or ectopy (1.0 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Misdiagnosis of MAT as AF in the ED is rare. However, other diagnostic errors remain relatively common, underscoring the need for careful rhythm evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94223,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of the medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How often is multifocal atrial tachycardia mistaken for atrial fibrillation in the emergency department?\",\"authors\":\"Yuval Avidan, Amir Aker, Razi Khoury, Baruch Weizman, Sameer Kassem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjms.2025.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Multifocal atrial tachycardia (MAT), characterized by an irregularly irregular rhythm, is often regarded as a clinical imitator of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of MAT misclassification as AF in the emergency department (ED) setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 1828 ECGs from patients discharged with AF diagnoses over five years. All tracings were independently reviewed by three blinded cardiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MAT was identified in one case (0.05 %). Other misclassifications included atrial flutter (7.9 %), supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (1.6 %), and sinus rhythm with conduction disturbances, artifacts, or ectopy (1.0 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Misdiagnosis of MAT as AF in the ED is rare. However, other diagnostic errors remain relatively common, underscoring the need for careful rhythm evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of the medical sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of the medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2025.09.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of the medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2025.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
How often is multifocal atrial tachycardia mistaken for atrial fibrillation in the emergency department?
Objective: Multifocal atrial tachycardia (MAT), characterized by an irregularly irregular rhythm, is often regarded as a clinical imitator of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of MAT misclassification as AF in the emergency department (ED) setting.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1828 ECGs from patients discharged with AF diagnoses over five years. All tracings were independently reviewed by three blinded cardiologists.
Results: MAT was identified in one case (0.05 %). Other misclassifications included atrial flutter (7.9 %), supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (1.6 %), and sinus rhythm with conduction disturbances, artifacts, or ectopy (1.0 %).
Conclusions: Misdiagnosis of MAT as AF in the ED is rare. However, other diagnostic errors remain relatively common, underscoring the need for careful rhythm evaluation.