Fabien Scalzo, Robert A Coker, Lauren Souders, Leo Petrossian, Kern Bhugra, Lauren Sheehan, Eric C Leuthardt, Alexander R Carter
{"title":"慢性脑卒中患者上肢运动恢复-对照组结果纵向汇总分析。","authors":"Fabien Scalzo, Robert A Coker, Lauren Souders, Leo Petrossian, Kern Bhugra, Lauren Sheehan, Eric C Leuthardt, Alexander R Carter","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2025.1448174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examines the effects of regular physical activity on upper extremity motor recovery during the late subacute and chronic phases of stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were aggregated from 20 studies comprising 368 participants in control groups receiving usual care or general rehabilitation without specialized interventions. To isolate the impact of non-specific physical activity, studies involving robotics or task-specific therapies were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) motor scale. The pooled effect size for FMA-UE change was small and non-significant (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.11, 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.26, <i>p</i> > 0.05), indicating that general physical activity alone may result in limited improvements in upper extremity function in chronic stroke. Heterogeneity across studies was low, and no evidence of publication bias was found.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings provide a quantitative benchmark for expected gains from general activity and offer a reference for interpreting outcomes in future stroke rehabilitation trials lacking control groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"1448174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upper limb motor recovery in chronic stroke-longitudinal aggregate analysis from control group outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Fabien Scalzo, Robert A Coker, Lauren Souders, Leo Petrossian, Kern Bhugra, Lauren Sheehan, Eric C Leuthardt, Alexander R Carter\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fresc.2025.1448174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examines the effects of regular physical activity on upper extremity motor recovery during the late subacute and chronic phases of stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were aggregated from 20 studies comprising 368 participants in control groups receiving usual care or general rehabilitation without specialized interventions. To isolate the impact of non-specific physical activity, studies involving robotics or task-specific therapies were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) motor scale. The pooled effect size for FMA-UE change was small and non-significant (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.11, 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.26, <i>p</i> > 0.05), indicating that general physical activity alone may result in limited improvements in upper extremity function in chronic stroke. Heterogeneity across studies was low, and no evidence of publication bias was found.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings provide a quantitative benchmark for expected gains from general activity and offer a reference for interpreting outcomes in future stroke rehabilitation trials lacking control groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1448174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411421/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1448174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1448174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究探讨了在中风晚期亚急性期和慢性期有规律的身体活动对上肢运动恢复的影响。方法:数据来自20项研究,包括368名参与者,对照组接受常规护理或一般康复治疗,没有专门干预。为了分离非特异性体育活动的影响,排除了涉及机器人或任务特异性治疗的研究。结果:主要观察指标为Fugl-Meyer上肢运动量表(FMA-UE)的变化。FMA-UE变化的合并效应量较小且不显著(Cohen’s d = 0.11, 95% CI: -0.05 ~ 0.26, p < 0.05),表明仅一般体育活动可能导致慢性卒中患者上肢功能的有限改善。各研究的异质性较低,未发现发表偏倚的证据。讨论:这些发现为一般活动的预期收益提供了定量基准,并为未来缺乏对照组的脑卒中康复试验的结果解释提供了参考。
Upper limb motor recovery in chronic stroke-longitudinal aggregate analysis from control group outcomes.
Introduction: This study examines the effects of regular physical activity on upper extremity motor recovery during the late subacute and chronic phases of stroke.
Methods: Data were aggregated from 20 studies comprising 368 participants in control groups receiving usual care or general rehabilitation without specialized interventions. To isolate the impact of non-specific physical activity, studies involving robotics or task-specific therapies were excluded.
Results: The primary outcome was the change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) motor scale. The pooled effect size for FMA-UE change was small and non-significant (Cohen's d = 0.11, 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.26, p > 0.05), indicating that general physical activity alone may result in limited improvements in upper extremity function in chronic stroke. Heterogeneity across studies was low, and no evidence of publication bias was found.
Discussion: These findings provide a quantitative benchmark for expected gains from general activity and offer a reference for interpreting outcomes in future stroke rehabilitation trials lacking control groups.