认证对患者安全文化的影响:来自巴西多中心横断面研究的见解。

Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.36401/JQSH-24-42
Helidea de Oliveira Lima, Leopoldo Muniz da Silva, Rodrigo Gavina da Cruz, Ana Claudia Lopes Fernandes de Araújo, Vanessa de Melo Silva Torres, Deborah Simões, Desiree Stieven Machado, Joaquim Edson Vieira
{"title":"认证对患者安全文化的影响:来自巴西多中心横断面研究的见解。","authors":"Helidea de Oliveira Lima, Leopoldo Muniz da Silva, Rodrigo Gavina da Cruz, Ana Claudia Lopes Fernandes de Araújo, Vanessa de Melo Silva Torres, Deborah Simões, Desiree Stieven Machado, Joaquim Edson Vieira","doi":"10.36401/JQSH-24-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As healthcare organizations strive to improve the quality and safety of their services, there is growing recognition of the importance of fostering a patient safety culture to enhance patient safety and improve patient care outcomes. This study aims to evaluate healthcare professionals' perceptions of patient safety culture in accredited vs nonaccredited hospitals within a network of 68 hospitals in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, multicenter study included 68 hospitals from a private network. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) was administered across all participating hospitals in September 2022. Hospitals that had been formally recognized for their quality and safety standards were compared with nonaccredited hospitals. Scores for various dimensions of patient safety culture were compared between groups. A logistic regression model was applied to assess the association between the frequency of event reporting in the past 12 months and participant characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31,919 healthcare professionals responded to the survey. Compared with nonaccredited hospitals, accredited hospitals reported higher scores in communication openness (3% higher, <i>p</i> = 0.04), frequency of events reported (4% higher, <i>p</i> = 0.02), and overall perception of patient safety (4% higher, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Accreditation was associated with a reduced likelihood of event underreporting (odds ratio = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87), and physicians were more likely to underreport compared with nursing staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although accreditation enhances patient safety culture, its effect may be more limited in healthcare networks with robust quality management systems already in place. To drive meaningful improvements, policymakers should go beyond accreditation and prioritize the reinforcement of ongoing institutional safety initiatives. Particular attention should be given to persistent challenges, such as fostering a nonpunitive approach to errors and addressing underreporting of adverse events. A graphical abstract is provided in the supplemental material.</p>","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":"8 3","pages":"102-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Accreditation on Patient Safety Culture: Insights from a Brazilian Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Helidea de Oliveira Lima, Leopoldo Muniz da Silva, Rodrigo Gavina da Cruz, Ana Claudia Lopes Fernandes de Araújo, Vanessa de Melo Silva Torres, Deborah Simões, Desiree Stieven Machado, Joaquim Edson Vieira\",\"doi\":\"10.36401/JQSH-24-42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As healthcare organizations strive to improve the quality and safety of their services, there is growing recognition of the importance of fostering a patient safety culture to enhance patient safety and improve patient care outcomes. This study aims to evaluate healthcare professionals' perceptions of patient safety culture in accredited vs nonaccredited hospitals within a network of 68 hospitals in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, multicenter study included 68 hospitals from a private network. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) was administered across all participating hospitals in September 2022. Hospitals that had been formally recognized for their quality and safety standards were compared with nonaccredited hospitals. Scores for various dimensions of patient safety culture were compared between groups. A logistic regression model was applied to assess the association between the frequency of event reporting in the past 12 months and participant characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31,919 healthcare professionals responded to the survey. Compared with nonaccredited hospitals, accredited hospitals reported higher scores in communication openness (3% higher, <i>p</i> = 0.04), frequency of events reported (4% higher, <i>p</i> = 0.02), and overall perception of patient safety (4% higher, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Accreditation was associated with a reduced likelihood of event underreporting (odds ratio = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87), and physicians were more likely to underreport compared with nursing staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although accreditation enhances patient safety culture, its effect may be more limited in healthcare networks with robust quality management systems already in place. To drive meaningful improvements, policymakers should go beyond accreditation and prioritize the reinforcement of ongoing institutional safety initiatives. Particular attention should be given to persistent challenges, such as fostering a nonpunitive approach to errors and addressing underreporting of adverse events. A graphical abstract is provided in the supplemental material.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"102-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410063/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-24-42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-24-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:随着医疗保健组织努力提高其服务的质量和安全性,越来越多的人认识到培养患者安全文化对于增强患者安全和改善患者护理结果的重要性。本研究旨在评估巴西68家医院网络中认证与非认证医院的医疗保健专业人员对患者安全文化的看法。方法:这项横断面、多中心研究包括来自私人网络的68家医院。医院患者安全文化调查(HSOPSC)于2022年9月在所有参与医院进行。质量和安全标准得到正式认可的医院与未经认可的医院进行了比较。比较两组患者安全培养各维度的得分。应用逻辑回归模型评估过去12个月事件报告频率与参与者特征之间的关系。结果:共有31,919名医护专业人员回应了调查。与非认证医院相比,认证医院在沟通开放性(高3%,p = 0.04)、事件报告频率(高4%,p = 0.02)和患者整体安全感知(高4%,p = 0.02)方面得分更高。认证与低报事件的可能性相关(优势比= 0.80;95% CI, 0.74-0.87),并且与护理人员相比,医生更容易低报事件。结论:尽管认证增强了患者安全文化,但在已经建立了健全质量管理体系的医疗保健网络中,其效果可能更为有限。为了推动有意义的改进,政策制定者应该超越认证,优先加强正在进行的机构安全举措。应特别注意持续存在的挑战,例如培养对错误的非惩罚性方法和解决不良事件的少报问题。在补充材料中提供了图形摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Accreditation on Patient Safety Culture: Insights from a Brazilian Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

Effect of Accreditation on Patient Safety Culture: Insights from a Brazilian Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

Effect of Accreditation on Patient Safety Culture: Insights from a Brazilian Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction: As healthcare organizations strive to improve the quality and safety of their services, there is growing recognition of the importance of fostering a patient safety culture to enhance patient safety and improve patient care outcomes. This study aims to evaluate healthcare professionals' perceptions of patient safety culture in accredited vs nonaccredited hospitals within a network of 68 hospitals in Brazil.

Methods: This cross-sectional, multicenter study included 68 hospitals from a private network. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) was administered across all participating hospitals in September 2022. Hospitals that had been formally recognized for their quality and safety standards were compared with nonaccredited hospitals. Scores for various dimensions of patient safety culture were compared between groups. A logistic regression model was applied to assess the association between the frequency of event reporting in the past 12 months and participant characteristics.

Results: A total of 31,919 healthcare professionals responded to the survey. Compared with nonaccredited hospitals, accredited hospitals reported higher scores in communication openness (3% higher, p = 0.04), frequency of events reported (4% higher, p = 0.02), and overall perception of patient safety (4% higher, p = 0.02). Accreditation was associated with a reduced likelihood of event underreporting (odds ratio = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87), and physicians were more likely to underreport compared with nursing staff.

Conclusion: Although accreditation enhances patient safety culture, its effect may be more limited in healthcare networks with robust quality management systems already in place. To drive meaningful improvements, policymakers should go beyond accreditation and prioritize the reinforcement of ongoing institutional safety initiatives. Particular attention should be given to persistent challenges, such as fostering a nonpunitive approach to errors and addressing underreporting of adverse events. A graphical abstract is provided in the supplemental material.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信