Wentao Wang, Cong Huang, Yi Shen, Jing Cheng, Ling Wang
{"title":"步数监测干预在增加儿童和青少年身体活动中的有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Wentao Wang, Cong Huang, Yi Shen, Jing Cheng, Ling Wang","doi":"10.1177/20552076251374249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of step-count monitoring interventions on objectively measured physical activity-related outcomes in children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was designed and conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following five electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library. The search was performed from the date of database inception to December 7, 2024. Meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the pooled effects of the interventions on daily steps, accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), light physical activity (LPA), and sedentary behavior (SB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four studies were selected for this meta-analysis. Step-count monitoring interventions could significantly increase daily steps (MD 1588.83 steps/day; 95% CI 1033.94 to 2143.72; <i>P</i> < 0.01) and tended to significantly reduce SB (MD -3.42 min/day; 95% CI -6.83 to -0.01; <i>P</i> = 0.05). However, they had no significant effects on MVPA (MD 0.59 min/day; 95% CI -3.46 to 4.64; <i>P</i> = 0.78) and LPA (MD 1.29 min/day; 95% CI -1.44 to 4.03; <i>P</i> = 0.35). Subgroup analyses indicated that step-count monitoring interventions offered greater benefits for increasing MVPA in children (MD 6.09 min/day; <i>P</i> < 0.01) than in adolescents (MD -3.79 min/day; <i>P</i> = 0.13). Pedometer-based interventions (MD 1757.58 steps/day; <i>P</i> < 0.01) were more effective at increasing daily steps than those involving other emerging step-count monitoring devices (MD 406.12 steps/day; <i>P</i> = 0.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Step-count monitoring interventions may be appropriate and effective for increasing total physical activity and reducing SB in children and adolescents. Moreover, these interventions may serve as an optional approach for increasing MVPA in children. We recommend a \"less is more\" strategy with regard to step-count monitoring interventions for increasing physical activity in children and adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076251374249"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of step-count monitoring interventions in increasing physical activity among children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wentao Wang, Cong Huang, Yi Shen, Jing Cheng, Ling Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076251374249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of step-count monitoring interventions on objectively measured physical activity-related outcomes in children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was designed and conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following five electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library. The search was performed from the date of database inception to December 7, 2024. Meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the pooled effects of the interventions on daily steps, accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), light physical activity (LPA), and sedentary behavior (SB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four studies were selected for this meta-analysis. Step-count monitoring interventions could significantly increase daily steps (MD 1588.83 steps/day; 95% CI 1033.94 to 2143.72; <i>P</i> < 0.01) and tended to significantly reduce SB (MD -3.42 min/day; 95% CI -6.83 to -0.01; <i>P</i> = 0.05). However, they had no significant effects on MVPA (MD 0.59 min/day; 95% CI -3.46 to 4.64; <i>P</i> = 0.78) and LPA (MD 1.29 min/day; 95% CI -1.44 to 4.03; <i>P</i> = 0.35). Subgroup analyses indicated that step-count monitoring interventions offered greater benefits for increasing MVPA in children (MD 6.09 min/day; <i>P</i> < 0.01) than in adolescents (MD -3.79 min/day; <i>P</i> = 0.13). Pedometer-based interventions (MD 1757.58 steps/day; <i>P</i> < 0.01) were more effective at increasing daily steps than those involving other emerging step-count monitoring devices (MD 406.12 steps/day; <i>P</i> = 0.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Step-count monitoring interventions may be appropriate and effective for increasing total physical activity and reducing SB in children and adolescents. Moreover, these interventions may serve as an optional approach for increasing MVPA in children. We recommend a \\\"less is more\\\" strategy with regard to step-count monitoring interventions for increasing physical activity in children and adolescents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"20552076251374249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409064/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251374249\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251374249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估步数监测干预对儿童和青少年客观测量的体育活动相关结果的影响。方法:本综述是根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南设计和实施的。检索了以下五个电子数据库以确定相关研究:PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus和Cochrane Library。搜索从数据库建立之日起一直进行到2024年12月7日。进行meta分析以评估干预措施对每日步数、加速度计测量的中高强度体力活动(MVPA)、轻度体力活动(LPA)和久坐行为(SB)的综合影响。结果:34项研究被纳入meta分析。步数监测干预可显著增加每日步数(MD 1588.83步/天;95% CI 1033.94 ~ 2143.72; P = 0.05)。然而,它们对MVPA (MD 0.59分钟/天;95% CI -3.46至4.64;P = 0.78)和LPA (MD 1.29分钟/天;95% CI -1.44至4.03;P = 0.35)没有显著影响。亚组分析表明,步数监测干预措施对增加儿童MVPA有更大的益处(MD 6.09 min/day; P P = 0.13)。计步器干预(MD 1757.58步/天;P P = 0.37)。结论:步数监测干预对于增加儿童和青少年的总体力活动和降低SB可能是适当和有效的。此外,这些干预措施可以作为增加儿童MVPA的可选方法。我们建议在步数监测干预措施方面采取“少即是多”的策略,以增加儿童和青少年的身体活动。
Effectiveness of step-count monitoring interventions in increasing physical activity among children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of step-count monitoring interventions on objectively measured physical activity-related outcomes in children and adolescents.
Methods: This review was designed and conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following five electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library. The search was performed from the date of database inception to December 7, 2024. Meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the pooled effects of the interventions on daily steps, accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), light physical activity (LPA), and sedentary behavior (SB).
Results: Thirty-four studies were selected for this meta-analysis. Step-count monitoring interventions could significantly increase daily steps (MD 1588.83 steps/day; 95% CI 1033.94 to 2143.72; P < 0.01) and tended to significantly reduce SB (MD -3.42 min/day; 95% CI -6.83 to -0.01; P = 0.05). However, they had no significant effects on MVPA (MD 0.59 min/day; 95% CI -3.46 to 4.64; P = 0.78) and LPA (MD 1.29 min/day; 95% CI -1.44 to 4.03; P = 0.35). Subgroup analyses indicated that step-count monitoring interventions offered greater benefits for increasing MVPA in children (MD 6.09 min/day; P < 0.01) than in adolescents (MD -3.79 min/day; P = 0.13). Pedometer-based interventions (MD 1757.58 steps/day; P < 0.01) were more effective at increasing daily steps than those involving other emerging step-count monitoring devices (MD 406.12 steps/day; P = 0.37).
Conclusions: Step-count monitoring interventions may be appropriate and effective for increasing total physical activity and reducing SB in children and adolescents. Moreover, these interventions may serve as an optional approach for increasing MVPA in children. We recommend a "less is more" strategy with regard to step-count monitoring interventions for increasing physical activity in children and adolescents.