Juan Górriz-Magaña, Ramon Maruri-Sánchez, Ane Elorriaga, Nahikari Salterain-González, Alicia Prieto-Lobato, Raúl Gascueña Rubia, Isabel Monedero Sánchez, Ana Elvira-Laffond, Miguel Lapena Reguero, Amanda Leandro Barros, Cristina Villabona Rivas, Alejandro Gutiérrez-Fernández, César Jiménez-Méndez, Silvia Prieto-González, María Melendo-Viu, Blanca Alcón Durán, Emilio Blanco López, Clara Bonanad Lozano, Alejandro Durante-López, Anna Carrasquer, Pedro Martínez-Losas, Teresa Alvarado Casas, Pedro Pájaro Merino, Victor Juárez-Olmos, Javier Lopez-Pais, Michelle M Kittleson, Pablo Díez-Villanueva, Jordi Bañeras
{"title":"患者和医生对心血管风险的看法:西班牙住院患者沟通差距的多中心调查","authors":"Juan Górriz-Magaña, Ramon Maruri-Sánchez, Ane Elorriaga, Nahikari Salterain-González, Alicia Prieto-Lobato, Raúl Gascueña Rubia, Isabel Monedero Sánchez, Ana Elvira-Laffond, Miguel Lapena Reguero, Amanda Leandro Barros, Cristina Villabona Rivas, Alejandro Gutiérrez-Fernández, César Jiménez-Méndez, Silvia Prieto-González, María Melendo-Viu, Blanca Alcón Durán, Emilio Blanco López, Clara Bonanad Lozano, Alejandro Durante-López, Anna Carrasquer, Pedro Martínez-Losas, Teresa Alvarado Casas, Pedro Pájaro Merino, Victor Juárez-Olmos, Javier Lopez-Pais, Michelle M Kittleson, Pablo Díez-Villanueva, Jordi Bañeras","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective risk communication is essential in managing cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of global mortality. Clear communication between patients and physicians supports informed decision-making, yet comprehension gaps persist. We aimed to assess the quality of risk communication during hospital admissions for cardiovascular events, from patient and physician perspectives, and identify discrepancies in risk perception and associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The HARIPA study (Heart Risk Perception and Communication Inpatient) by the Spanish Society of Cardiology was a multicenter, cross-sectional analysis conducted in 28 hospitals across Spain from October 2022 to March 2023. It included consecutive cardiology inpatients (urgent or scheduled), aged ≥18 years, who could complete structured questionnaires. Participating physicians also completed parallel questionnaires. These assessed admission diagnosis, perceptions of future cardiovascular risk, and communication about potential procedural complications. Agreement between responses was evaluated using kappa indices (weighted for ordinal variables), and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the impact of demographic and clinical factors (odds ratios with 95% CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 943 patients (mean age, 68.2 years; 29.4% women). The most frequent reason for admission was ischemic heart disease (41.3%). Responses resulted in a substantial agreement, with a kappa index of 0.72. Concordance between patients and physicians regarding future cardiovascular risk was low (weighted kappa: 0.29), with patients often underestimating their risk. And for assessment about procedural potential complications was moderate (kappa: 0.34). Although 76.9% of patients reported feeling adequately informed about procedural risks, 69.3% of those who experienced complications (n=208) stated they had not been warned about them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals significant gaps in risk communication in cardiovascular care, particularly regarding future risks and complications. As well-informed patients are more likely to adhere to preventive therapies, tailoring communication strategies to individual patient characteristics could improve understanding and align perceptions with clinical realities, enhancing health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e011837"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and Physician Perspectives on Cardiovascular Risk: A Multicenter Survey of Communication Gaps Among Hospitalized Patients in Spain.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Górriz-Magaña, Ramon Maruri-Sánchez, Ane Elorriaga, Nahikari Salterain-González, Alicia Prieto-Lobato, Raúl Gascueña Rubia, Isabel Monedero Sánchez, Ana Elvira-Laffond, Miguel Lapena Reguero, Amanda Leandro Barros, Cristina Villabona Rivas, Alejandro Gutiérrez-Fernández, César Jiménez-Méndez, Silvia Prieto-González, María Melendo-Viu, Blanca Alcón Durán, Emilio Blanco López, Clara Bonanad Lozano, Alejandro Durante-López, Anna Carrasquer, Pedro Martínez-Losas, Teresa Alvarado Casas, Pedro Pájaro Merino, Victor Juárez-Olmos, Javier Lopez-Pais, Michelle M Kittleson, Pablo Díez-Villanueva, Jordi Bañeras\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective risk communication is essential in managing cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of global mortality. Clear communication between patients and physicians supports informed decision-making, yet comprehension gaps persist. We aimed to assess the quality of risk communication during hospital admissions for cardiovascular events, from patient and physician perspectives, and identify discrepancies in risk perception and associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The HARIPA study (Heart Risk Perception and Communication Inpatient) by the Spanish Society of Cardiology was a multicenter, cross-sectional analysis conducted in 28 hospitals across Spain from October 2022 to March 2023. It included consecutive cardiology inpatients (urgent or scheduled), aged ≥18 years, who could complete structured questionnaires. Participating physicians also completed parallel questionnaires. These assessed admission diagnosis, perceptions of future cardiovascular risk, and communication about potential procedural complications. Agreement between responses was evaluated using kappa indices (weighted for ordinal variables), and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the impact of demographic and clinical factors (odds ratios with 95% CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 943 patients (mean age, 68.2 years; 29.4% women). The most frequent reason for admission was ischemic heart disease (41.3%). Responses resulted in a substantial agreement, with a kappa index of 0.72. Concordance between patients and physicians regarding future cardiovascular risk was low (weighted kappa: 0.29), with patients often underestimating their risk. And for assessment about procedural potential complications was moderate (kappa: 0.34). Although 76.9% of patients reported feeling adequately informed about procedural risks, 69.3% of those who experienced complications (n=208) stated they had not been warned about them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals significant gaps in risk communication in cardiovascular care, particularly regarding future risks and complications. As well-informed patients are more likely to adhere to preventive therapies, tailoring communication strategies to individual patient characteristics could improve understanding and align perceptions with clinical realities, enhancing health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e011837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011837\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient and Physician Perspectives on Cardiovascular Risk: A Multicenter Survey of Communication Gaps Among Hospitalized Patients in Spain.
Background: Effective risk communication is essential in managing cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of global mortality. Clear communication between patients and physicians supports informed decision-making, yet comprehension gaps persist. We aimed to assess the quality of risk communication during hospital admissions for cardiovascular events, from patient and physician perspectives, and identify discrepancies in risk perception and associated factors.
Methods: The HARIPA study (Heart Risk Perception and Communication Inpatient) by the Spanish Society of Cardiology was a multicenter, cross-sectional analysis conducted in 28 hospitals across Spain from October 2022 to March 2023. It included consecutive cardiology inpatients (urgent or scheduled), aged ≥18 years, who could complete structured questionnaires. Participating physicians also completed parallel questionnaires. These assessed admission diagnosis, perceptions of future cardiovascular risk, and communication about potential procedural complications. Agreement between responses was evaluated using kappa indices (weighted for ordinal variables), and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the impact of demographic and clinical factors (odds ratios with 95% CIs).
Results: We included 943 patients (mean age, 68.2 years; 29.4% women). The most frequent reason for admission was ischemic heart disease (41.3%). Responses resulted in a substantial agreement, with a kappa index of 0.72. Concordance between patients and physicians regarding future cardiovascular risk was low (weighted kappa: 0.29), with patients often underestimating their risk. And for assessment about procedural potential complications was moderate (kappa: 0.34). Although 76.9% of patients reported feeling adequately informed about procedural risks, 69.3% of those who experienced complications (n=208) stated they had not been warned about them.
Conclusions: This study reveals significant gaps in risk communication in cardiovascular care, particularly regarding future risks and complications. As well-informed patients are more likely to adhere to preventive therapies, tailoring communication strategies to individual patient characteristics could improve understanding and align perceptions with clinical realities, enhancing health outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.