弥合全球健康中的性别差距:性别与健康应用学习研究所的见解。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Annals of Global Health Pub Date : 2025-09-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/aogh.4811
Mary de Boer, Katherine Banchoff, Rosemary Morgan, Anna Kalbarczyk
{"title":"弥合全球健康中的性别差距:性别与健康应用学习研究所的见解。","authors":"Mary de Boer, Katherine Banchoff, Rosemary Morgan, Anna Kalbarczyk","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Gender's influence on health outcomes is well-documented, yet gaps in gender expertise persist within the global health workforce. Simultaneously, accessible and interactive gender training opportunities are limited. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Gender and Health Summer Institute (GHSI), launched in 2023, aims to address these gaps by advancing the gender integration and analysis skills of health professionals. <i>Methods:</i> Using Stake's Countenance Model for educational evaluations, we explored whether the Institute was meeting its objective of providing applied knowledge and experience of gender integration and analysis for health research, programs, and policy. The evaluation focused on intended and actual program outcomes. We examined proposal documents and held discussions with the GHSI team. All students receive pre-course surveys one week prior to each course. Post-course surveys focused on changes in knowledge, skills, and abilities and overall experience. Two focus-group discussions were held with students. Survey data were analyzed descriptively in R, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. <i>Results:</i> The pre-course survey received 137 unique responses; the post-course survey received 78 responses. Results indicate that the GHSI successfully met many of its intended goals, for example, by increasing participants' knowledge and skills in gender analysis and integration as well as confidence in applying new skills. Learning was enhanced through creating safe and inclusive spaces. However, the courses' short duration and lack of a sustained community of practice were identified as areas for improvement. <i>Conclusion:</i> Findings underscore the importance of applied skills training and the need for ongoing support to fully equip professionals to address gender disparities in health. The GHSI's virtual format also demonstrates a scalable, innovative approach other programs may consider. Finally, recommendations are provided for enhancing the GHSI and similar programs to better serve working professionals and foster a more equitable global health landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":"91 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Gender Gaps in Global Health: Insights from the Gender and Health Applied Learning Institute.\",\"authors\":\"Mary de Boer, Katherine Banchoff, Rosemary Morgan, Anna Kalbarczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/aogh.4811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Gender's influence on health outcomes is well-documented, yet gaps in gender expertise persist within the global health workforce. Simultaneously, accessible and interactive gender training opportunities are limited. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Gender and Health Summer Institute (GHSI), launched in 2023, aims to address these gaps by advancing the gender integration and analysis skills of health professionals. <i>Methods:</i> Using Stake's Countenance Model for educational evaluations, we explored whether the Institute was meeting its objective of providing applied knowledge and experience of gender integration and analysis for health research, programs, and policy. The evaluation focused on intended and actual program outcomes. We examined proposal documents and held discussions with the GHSI team. All students receive pre-course surveys one week prior to each course. Post-course surveys focused on changes in knowledge, skills, and abilities and overall experience. Two focus-group discussions were held with students. Survey data were analyzed descriptively in R, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. <i>Results:</i> The pre-course survey received 137 unique responses; the post-course survey received 78 responses. Results indicate that the GHSI successfully met many of its intended goals, for example, by increasing participants' knowledge and skills in gender analysis and integration as well as confidence in applying new skills. Learning was enhanced through creating safe and inclusive spaces. However, the courses' short duration and lack of a sustained community of practice were identified as areas for improvement. <i>Conclusion:</i> Findings underscore the importance of applied skills training and the need for ongoing support to fully equip professionals to address gender disparities in health. The GHSI's virtual format also demonstrates a scalable, innovative approach other programs may consider. Finally, recommendations are provided for enhancing the GHSI and similar programs to better serve working professionals and foster a more equitable global health landscape.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412444/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4811\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4811","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:性别对健康结果的影响有据可查,但全球卫生人力在性别专业知识方面仍然存在差距。同时,可获得和互动的性别培训机会有限。约翰霍普金斯大学彭博公共卫生学院性别与健康暑期学院(GHSI)于2023年启动,旨在通过提高卫生专业人员的性别融合和分析技能来解决这些差距。方法:利用斯特克面容模型进行教育评估,探讨该研究所是否达到了为卫生研究、项目和政策提供性别融合和分析的应用知识和经验的目标。评估集中在预期的和实际的项目结果上。我们审查了提案文件,并与GHSI团队进行了讨论。所有学生在每门课程前一周接受课前调查。课程结束后的调查侧重于知识、技能、能力和整体经验的变化。与学生举行了两次焦点小组讨论。调查数据在R中进行描述性分析,定性数据进行主题分析。结果:课前调查共收到137份独特回复;课程结束后的调查收到了78份回复。结果表明,GHSI成功地实现了许多预期目标,例如,通过增加参与者在性别分析和整合方面的知识和技能,以及应用新技能的信心。通过创造安全和包容的空间,促进了学习。然而,课程持续时间短和缺乏持续的实践社区被确定为需要改进的领域。结论:调查结果强调了应用技能培训的重要性和持续支持的必要性,以使专业人员充分具备解决保健领域性别差异的能力。GHSI的虚拟格式还展示了一种可扩展的、创新的方法,其他程序可能会考虑。最后,提出了加强全球卫生安全体系和类似方案的建议,以便更好地为在职专业人员服务,促进更公平的全球卫生格局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bridging Gender Gaps in Global Health: Insights from the Gender and Health Applied Learning Institute.

Bridging Gender Gaps in Global Health: Insights from the Gender and Health Applied Learning Institute.

Bridging Gender Gaps in Global Health: Insights from the Gender and Health Applied Learning Institute.

Bridging Gender Gaps in Global Health: Insights from the Gender and Health Applied Learning Institute.

Background: Gender's influence on health outcomes is well-documented, yet gaps in gender expertise persist within the global health workforce. Simultaneously, accessible and interactive gender training opportunities are limited. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Gender and Health Summer Institute (GHSI), launched in 2023, aims to address these gaps by advancing the gender integration and analysis skills of health professionals. Methods: Using Stake's Countenance Model for educational evaluations, we explored whether the Institute was meeting its objective of providing applied knowledge and experience of gender integration and analysis for health research, programs, and policy. The evaluation focused on intended and actual program outcomes. We examined proposal documents and held discussions with the GHSI team. All students receive pre-course surveys one week prior to each course. Post-course surveys focused on changes in knowledge, skills, and abilities and overall experience. Two focus-group discussions were held with students. Survey data were analyzed descriptively in R, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Results: The pre-course survey received 137 unique responses; the post-course survey received 78 responses. Results indicate that the GHSI successfully met many of its intended goals, for example, by increasing participants' knowledge and skills in gender analysis and integration as well as confidence in applying new skills. Learning was enhanced through creating safe and inclusive spaces. However, the courses' short duration and lack of a sustained community of practice were identified as areas for improvement. Conclusion: Findings underscore the importance of applied skills training and the need for ongoing support to fully equip professionals to address gender disparities in health. The GHSI's virtual format also demonstrates a scalable, innovative approach other programs may consider. Finally, recommendations are provided for enhancing the GHSI and similar programs to better serve working professionals and foster a more equitable global health landscape.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Global Health
Annals of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: ANNALS OF GLOBAL HEALTH is a peer-reviewed, open access journal focused on global health. The journal’s mission is to advance and disseminate knowledge of global health. Its goals are improve the health and well-being of all people, advance health equity and promote wise stewardship of the earth’s environment. The journal is published by the Boston College Global Public Health Program. It was founded in 1934 by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai as the Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine. It is a partner journal of the Consortium of Universities for Global Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信