将高可靠性原则应用于输液泵安全:一个多站点卫生系统的案例研究。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ann M West, Nicole L Schueler, Rachel A Moody, Merissa T Andersen, Jill S Dinsmore, David B Miller, Charles D Wickens, Pauline M Byom, Andrea Y Lehnertz, Kannan Ramar
{"title":"将高可靠性原则应用于输液泵安全:一个多站点卫生系统的案例研究。","authors":"Ann M West, Nicole L Schueler, Rachel A Moody, Merissa T Andersen, Jill S Dinsmore, David B Miller, Charles D Wickens, Pauline M Byom, Andrea Y Lehnertz, Kannan Ramar","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A framework of high-reliability principles was used to identify, investigate, and mitigate infusion pump safety concerns at a large, multisite health care system. We developed a systematic approach to address challenges associated with overinfusions, underinfusions, and the inability to clear upstream occlusion alarms. We identified 112,875 upstream occlusion events for 389,604 infusion starts (failure rate, 29%) within 6 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five high-reliability principles were applied to infusion pump management. Preoccupation with failure emphasized reporting safety concerns and performing appropriate clinical and bench tests. Deference to expertise prompted the development of a multidisciplinary team with internal and external partners. Sensitivity to operations prompted assessment of human factors design, with simulations and analysis of medication-specific factors (e.g., viscosity; infusion rates). Reluctance to simplify prompted assessment of tubing characteristics (e.g., concentricity; wall thickness) with micro-computed tomography and process development for removing faulty equipment. Practice of resilience ensured ongoing engagement and commitment to a culture of safety and patient advocacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multidisciplinary oversight team prompted a national recall, removal of malfunctioning pumps, and development of system-wide training and mitigation protocols. Despite ongoing pump challenges, our team optimized internal patient safety systems and processes. The cause of these malfunctions remains under investigation, but serious patient harm has been prevented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key strategies for enhancing patient safety were continuous vigilance, interdisciplinary collaboration, and embracing complexity in a large health care organization. Future directions involve deeply integrating these high-reliability principles across all aspects of health care delivery to continue improving safety and quality outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying High-reliability Principles to Infusion Pump Safety: A Case Study at a Multisite Health System.\",\"authors\":\"Ann M West, Nicole L Schueler, Rachel A Moody, Merissa T Andersen, Jill S Dinsmore, David B Miller, Charles D Wickens, Pauline M Byom, Andrea Y Lehnertz, Kannan Ramar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A framework of high-reliability principles was used to identify, investigate, and mitigate infusion pump safety concerns at a large, multisite health care system. We developed a systematic approach to address challenges associated with overinfusions, underinfusions, and the inability to clear upstream occlusion alarms. We identified 112,875 upstream occlusion events for 389,604 infusion starts (failure rate, 29%) within 6 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five high-reliability principles were applied to infusion pump management. Preoccupation with failure emphasized reporting safety concerns and performing appropriate clinical and bench tests. Deference to expertise prompted the development of a multidisciplinary team with internal and external partners. Sensitivity to operations prompted assessment of human factors design, with simulations and analysis of medication-specific factors (e.g., viscosity; infusion rates). Reluctance to simplify prompted assessment of tubing characteristics (e.g., concentricity; wall thickness) with micro-computed tomography and process development for removing faulty equipment. Practice of resilience ensured ongoing engagement and commitment to a culture of safety and patient advocacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multidisciplinary oversight team prompted a national recall, removal of malfunctioning pumps, and development of system-wide training and mitigation protocols. Despite ongoing pump challenges, our team optimized internal patient safety systems and processes. The cause of these malfunctions remains under investigation, but serious patient harm has been prevented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key strategies for enhancing patient safety were continuous vigilance, interdisciplinary collaboration, and embracing complexity in a large health care organization. Future directions involve deeply integrating these high-reliability principles across all aspects of health care delivery to continue improving safety and quality outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001395\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用高可靠性原则框架来识别、调查和减轻大型多站点卫生保健系统中输液泵的安全问题。我们开发了一种系统的方法来解决与过度输液、输液不足和无法清除上游闭塞警报相关的挑战。我们在6个月内发现了389,604例输注开始(失败率,29%)的112,875例上游闭塞事件。方法:应用5条高可靠性原则对输液泵进行管理。对失败的关注强调报告安全问题和执行适当的临床和台架试验。对专业知识的尊重促使了一个由内部和外部合作伙伴组成的多学科团队的发展。对操作的敏感性促使对人为因素设计进行评估,并对药物特异性因素(如粘度、输液速率)进行模拟和分析。由于不愿简化对油管特性(如同心度、壁厚)的评估,因此采用了微型计算机断层扫描技术和去除故障设备的工艺开发。复原力的实践确保了对安全和患者倡导文化的持续参与和承诺。结果:多学科监督小组促使全国召回,拆除故障泵,并制定了全系统培训和缓解方案。尽管持续的泵挑战,我们的团队优化了内部患者安全系统和流程。这些故障的原因仍在调查中,但已经避免了对患者造成严重伤害。结论:在大型医疗机构中,提高患者安全的关键策略是持续警惕、跨学科合作和接受复杂性。未来的发展方向包括将这些高可靠性原则深入整合到医疗保健服务的各个方面,以继续提高安全性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying High-reliability Principles to Infusion Pump Safety: A Case Study at a Multisite Health System.

Objectives: A framework of high-reliability principles was used to identify, investigate, and mitigate infusion pump safety concerns at a large, multisite health care system. We developed a systematic approach to address challenges associated with overinfusions, underinfusions, and the inability to clear upstream occlusion alarms. We identified 112,875 upstream occlusion events for 389,604 infusion starts (failure rate, 29%) within 6 months.

Methods: Five high-reliability principles were applied to infusion pump management. Preoccupation with failure emphasized reporting safety concerns and performing appropriate clinical and bench tests. Deference to expertise prompted the development of a multidisciplinary team with internal and external partners. Sensitivity to operations prompted assessment of human factors design, with simulations and analysis of medication-specific factors (e.g., viscosity; infusion rates). Reluctance to simplify prompted assessment of tubing characteristics (e.g., concentricity; wall thickness) with micro-computed tomography and process development for removing faulty equipment. Practice of resilience ensured ongoing engagement and commitment to a culture of safety and patient advocacy.

Results: The multidisciplinary oversight team prompted a national recall, removal of malfunctioning pumps, and development of system-wide training and mitigation protocols. Despite ongoing pump challenges, our team optimized internal patient safety systems and processes. The cause of these malfunctions remains under investigation, but serious patient harm has been prevented.

Conclusions: Key strategies for enhancing patient safety were continuous vigilance, interdisciplinary collaboration, and embracing complexity in a large health care organization. Future directions involve deeply integrating these high-reliability principles across all aspects of health care delivery to continue improving safety and quality outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信