Marianna Maspero, Carlo Sposito, Chase Wehrle, Marco Bongini, Isabella Pezzoli, Sherrie Bhoori, Valentina Bellia, Andrea Schlegel, Vincenzo Mazzaferro
{"title":"肝细胞癌肝移植术后复发生存率。","authors":"Marianna Maspero, Carlo Sposito, Chase Wehrle, Marco Bongini, Isabella Pezzoli, Sherrie Bhoori, Valentina Bellia, Andrea Schlegel, Vincenzo Mazzaferro","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mortality after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is mainly driven by HCC recurrence. We sought to determine whether post-recurrence survival (PRS) has improved during the last 2 decades.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we included all patients who underwent LT for HCC between 2003 and 2020 and experienced HCC recurrence. Patients were divided into 4 eras (2003-2007, 2008-2012, 2013-2016, and 2017-2020) according to their year of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 26 309 patients who underwent LT for HCC, 2518 patients were included: 276 (11%) in era 1; 662 (26.3%) in era 2; 685 (27.2%) in era 3; and 895 (35.5%) in era 4. Patients in later eras were more likely to be outside Milan, but within Metroticket 2.0, and underwent more bridging therapies. Median PRS was 9 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 8-10 mo) for era 1, 13 (11-15) for era 2, 15 (13.5-16.5) for era 3, and 17 mo (15-19 mo) for era 4 (P < 0.001). After adjusting for time to recurrence, only the comparison between era 1 and era 4 remained significant. At multivariable analysis, only time to recurrence <24 mo (hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7; P < 0.0001) and poorly differentiated HCC (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8; P < 0.0001) were associated with PRS, while recurrence era was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRS has only modestly improved during the last 2 decades. Despite more patients undergoing bridging therapies in later eras, PRS has not changed compared with eras with more restrictive transplant criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-recurrence Survival After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Marianna Maspero, Carlo Sposito, Chase Wehrle, Marco Bongini, Isabella Pezzoli, Sherrie Bhoori, Valentina Bellia, Andrea Schlegel, Vincenzo Mazzaferro\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TP.0000000000005514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mortality after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is mainly driven by HCC recurrence. We sought to determine whether post-recurrence survival (PRS) has improved during the last 2 decades.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we included all patients who underwent LT for HCC between 2003 and 2020 and experienced HCC recurrence. Patients were divided into 4 eras (2003-2007, 2008-2012, 2013-2016, and 2017-2020) according to their year of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 26 309 patients who underwent LT for HCC, 2518 patients were included: 276 (11%) in era 1; 662 (26.3%) in era 2; 685 (27.2%) in era 3; and 895 (35.5%) in era 4. Patients in later eras were more likely to be outside Milan, but within Metroticket 2.0, and underwent more bridging therapies. Median PRS was 9 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 8-10 mo) for era 1, 13 (11-15) for era 2, 15 (13.5-16.5) for era 3, and 17 mo (15-19 mo) for era 4 (P < 0.001). After adjusting for time to recurrence, only the comparison between era 1 and era 4 remained significant. At multivariable analysis, only time to recurrence <24 mo (hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7; P < 0.0001) and poorly differentiated HCC (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8; P < 0.0001) were associated with PRS, while recurrence era was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRS has only modestly improved during the last 2 decades. Despite more patients undergoing bridging therapies in later eras, PRS has not changed compared with eras with more restrictive transplant criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005514\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005514","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Post-recurrence Survival After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Background: Mortality after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is mainly driven by HCC recurrence. We sought to determine whether post-recurrence survival (PRS) has improved during the last 2 decades.
Methods: Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we included all patients who underwent LT for HCC between 2003 and 2020 and experienced HCC recurrence. Patients were divided into 4 eras (2003-2007, 2008-2012, 2013-2016, and 2017-2020) according to their year of recurrence.
Results: Of 26 309 patients who underwent LT for HCC, 2518 patients were included: 276 (11%) in era 1; 662 (26.3%) in era 2; 685 (27.2%) in era 3; and 895 (35.5%) in era 4. Patients in later eras were more likely to be outside Milan, but within Metroticket 2.0, and underwent more bridging therapies. Median PRS was 9 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 8-10 mo) for era 1, 13 (11-15) for era 2, 15 (13.5-16.5) for era 3, and 17 mo (15-19 mo) for era 4 (P < 0.001). After adjusting for time to recurrence, only the comparison between era 1 and era 4 remained significant. At multivariable analysis, only time to recurrence <24 mo (hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7; P < 0.0001) and poorly differentiated HCC (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8; P < 0.0001) were associated with PRS, while recurrence era was not.
Conclusions: PRS has only modestly improved during the last 2 decades. Despite more patients undergoing bridging therapies in later eras, PRS has not changed compared with eras with more restrictive transplant criteria.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year.
Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal.
Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed.
The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation.