比较并行和逆流透析在血液透析中的流动:低钠血症患者的初步研究。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Amandeep Singh, Lalit Pursnani, Himansu Sekhar Mahapatra, Muthukumar Balakrishna, Manoj Prabhakaran, Abhishek Gautam, Anubhav Chakraborty
{"title":"比较并行和逆流透析在血液透析中的流动:低钠血症患者的初步研究。","authors":"Amandeep Singh, Lalit Pursnani, Himansu Sekhar Mahapatra, Muthukumar Balakrishna, Manoj Prabhakaran, Abhishek Gautam, Anubhav Chakraborty","doi":"10.1111/sdi.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In hyponatremic patients, concurrent dialysate flow during hemodialysis may be an ideal option to mitigate complications such as osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Present randomized controlled trial enrolled dialysis-requiring chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) patients with serum sodium levels < 125 mEq/L during January 2020 over 16 months. Hemodynamically unstable patients, as well as those with a history of seizures and neurological conditions, were excluded. All were randomized to concurrent and countercurrent dialysate flow groups during two-h dialysis session. Hydration status was evaluated by Body Composition Monitor BCMTM and hourly sodium was estimated to guide ultrafiltration. Comparative analysis of sodium correction rates (meq/L/h) during dialysis, neurological deterioration via Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, and ODS during 1 week and 1 month in both groups was done. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare sodium correction trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 44 hyponatremic patients of AKI (17.39%), CKD (56.52%) and acute on CKD (26.09%) were randomized to concurrent (n = 23) and countercurrent (n = 21) dialysate groups. Postdialysis sodium correction rate was nonsignificantly slower in the concurrent group (45.45%) vs. the countercurrent group (36.36% group, p = 0.44). Neurological deterioration, measured via MMSE scores, and ODS incidence were absent in both groups. The concurrent group exhibited a higher proportion of patients without neurological deterioration (73.91%) compared to the countercurrent group (57.14%, p = 0.241). Comparable survival between the two groups was seen at 10, 20, and 30 days. No significant risk factors for mortality were identified in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concurrent dialysate flow demonstrates a slower but nonsignificant rate of sodium correction, making it a safer alternative for managing severe hyponatremia during hemodialysis by reducing the risk of rapid neurological shifts.</p>","PeriodicalId":21675,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Concurrent and Countercurrent Dialysate Flow in Hemodialysis: A Pilot Study on Hyponatremic Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Amandeep Singh, Lalit Pursnani, Himansu Sekhar Mahapatra, Muthukumar Balakrishna, Manoj Prabhakaran, Abhishek Gautam, Anubhav Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sdi.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In hyponatremic patients, concurrent dialysate flow during hemodialysis may be an ideal option to mitigate complications such as osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Present randomized controlled trial enrolled dialysis-requiring chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) patients with serum sodium levels < 125 mEq/L during January 2020 over 16 months. Hemodynamically unstable patients, as well as those with a history of seizures and neurological conditions, were excluded. All were randomized to concurrent and countercurrent dialysate flow groups during two-h dialysis session. Hydration status was evaluated by Body Composition Monitor BCMTM and hourly sodium was estimated to guide ultrafiltration. Comparative analysis of sodium correction rates (meq/L/h) during dialysis, neurological deterioration via Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, and ODS during 1 week and 1 month in both groups was done. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare sodium correction trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 44 hyponatremic patients of AKI (17.39%), CKD (56.52%) and acute on CKD (26.09%) were randomized to concurrent (n = 23) and countercurrent (n = 21) dialysate groups. Postdialysis sodium correction rate was nonsignificantly slower in the concurrent group (45.45%) vs. the countercurrent group (36.36% group, p = 0.44). Neurological deterioration, measured via MMSE scores, and ODS incidence were absent in both groups. The concurrent group exhibited a higher proportion of patients without neurological deterioration (73.91%) compared to the countercurrent group (57.14%, p = 0.241). Comparable survival between the two groups was seen at 10, 20, and 30 days. No significant risk factors for mortality were identified in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concurrent dialysate flow demonstrates a slower but nonsignificant rate of sodium correction, making it a safer alternative for managing severe hyponatremia during hemodialysis by reducing the risk of rapid neurological shifts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Dialysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.70008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.70008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在低钠血症患者中,血液透析期间同时透析可能是减轻渗透性脱髓鞘综合征(ODS)等并发症的理想选择。方法:本随机对照试验纳入需要透析的慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)和急性肾损伤(AKI)患者。结果:共44例AKI(17.39%)、CKD(56.52%)和急性CKD(26.09%)低钠血症患者随机分为并发透析组(n = 23)和逆流透析组(n = 21)。透析后钠矫正率同步组(45.45%)较逆流组(36.36%,p = 0.44)无显著性差异。通过MMSE评分测量的神经退化和ODS发生率在两组中均不存在。并发组无神经功能恶化的患者比例(73.91%)高于逆流组(57.14%,p = 0.241)。两组在10天、20天和30天的生存率相当。两组均未发现显著的死亡危险因素。结论:同步透析液流量显示出较慢但不显著的钠纠正率,通过降低快速神经转移的风险,使其成为治疗血液透析期间严重低钠血症的更安全的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Concurrent and Countercurrent Dialysate Flow in Hemodialysis: A Pilot Study on Hyponatremic Patients.

Background: In hyponatremic patients, concurrent dialysate flow during hemodialysis may be an ideal option to mitigate complications such as osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS).

Methods: Present randomized controlled trial enrolled dialysis-requiring chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) patients with serum sodium levels < 125 mEq/L during January 2020 over 16 months. Hemodynamically unstable patients, as well as those with a history of seizures and neurological conditions, were excluded. All were randomized to concurrent and countercurrent dialysate flow groups during two-h dialysis session. Hydration status was evaluated by Body Composition Monitor BCMTM and hourly sodium was estimated to guide ultrafiltration. Comparative analysis of sodium correction rates (meq/L/h) during dialysis, neurological deterioration via Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, and ODS during 1 week and 1 month in both groups was done. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare sodium correction trends.

Results: A total of 44 hyponatremic patients of AKI (17.39%), CKD (56.52%) and acute on CKD (26.09%) were randomized to concurrent (n = 23) and countercurrent (n = 21) dialysate groups. Postdialysis sodium correction rate was nonsignificantly slower in the concurrent group (45.45%) vs. the countercurrent group (36.36% group, p = 0.44). Neurological deterioration, measured via MMSE scores, and ODS incidence were absent in both groups. The concurrent group exhibited a higher proportion of patients without neurological deterioration (73.91%) compared to the countercurrent group (57.14%, p = 0.241). Comparable survival between the two groups was seen at 10, 20, and 30 days. No significant risk factors for mortality were identified in either group.

Conclusion: Concurrent dialysate flow demonstrates a slower but nonsignificant rate of sodium correction, making it a safer alternative for managing severe hyponatremia during hemodialysis by reducing the risk of rapid neurological shifts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Dialysis
Seminars in Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Dialysis is a bimonthly publication focusing exclusively on cutting-edge clinical aspects of dialysis therapy. Besides publishing papers by the most respected names in the field of dialysis, the Journal has unique useful features, all designed to keep you current: -Fellows Forum -Dialysis rounds -Editorials -Opinions -Briefly noted -Summary and Comment -Guest Edited Issues -Special Articles Virtually everything you read in Seminars in Dialysis is written or solicited by the editors after choosing the most effective of nine different editorial styles and formats. They know that facts, speculations, ''how-to-do-it'' information, opinions, and news reports all play important roles in your education and the patient care you provide. Alternate issues of the journal are guest edited and focus on a single clinical topic in dialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信