住院姑息病房患者报告疼痛与临床评估疼痛的比较:一项回顾性观察研究。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-07 DOI:10.1177/02692163251363482
Chin-Chu Hsu, Cheng-Fu Lin, Jia-Jyun Wu, Sheng-Yun Lai, Wan-Ting Hsu, Pi-Shan Hsu, Shih-Yi Lin, Yi-Chen Chiu, Wei-Min Chu
{"title":"住院姑息病房患者报告疼痛与临床评估疼痛的比较:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Chin-Chu Hsu, Cheng-Fu Lin, Jia-Jyun Wu, Sheng-Yun Lai, Wan-Ting Hsu, Pi-Shan Hsu, Shih-Yi Lin, Yi-Chen Chiu, Wei-Min Chu","doi":"10.1177/02692163251363482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain assessment in palliative care is essential, but differences between patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain can affect care decisions. Identifying factors contributing to these differences can improve pain management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the clinical and symptom-related factors associated with variations between patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain among patients admitted to a palliative care ward.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational study using palliative care outcomes collaboration instruments was conducted from July 2021 to September 2023.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>The study included 755 terminally ill patients admitted to a palliative ward in Taiwan. Pain was assessed daily using the symptom assessment scale for patient-reported pain and the palliative care problem severity score for clinician-assessed pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 755 palliative care patients (median age = 69 years; 59.3% female), 181 were classified into the different group and 574 into the similar group based on initial patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain scores. Patients in the different group were younger, had a higher proportion of cancer diagnoses, and reported significantly higher levels of pain, fatigue, bowel problems, and difficulty sleeping. In multivariate analysis, bowel problems were the only independent factor associated with being in the different group (odds ratio = 1.07; 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.14; <i>p</i> = 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients in the different group exhibited greater symptom burden compared to those in the similar group, particularly in pain, fatigue, and bowel problems. Bowel problems independently predicted differences between patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain scores. These results indicate that differences in pain assessment are linked to the severity and complexity of physical symptoms, reinforcing the need for comprehensive, symptom-based evaluations in palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1010-1017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain in hospitalized palliative ward patients: A retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Chin-Chu Hsu, Cheng-Fu Lin, Jia-Jyun Wu, Sheng-Yun Lai, Wan-Ting Hsu, Pi-Shan Hsu, Shih-Yi Lin, Yi-Chen Chiu, Wei-Min Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692163251363482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain assessment in palliative care is essential, but differences between patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain can affect care decisions. Identifying factors contributing to these differences can improve pain management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the clinical and symptom-related factors associated with variations between patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain among patients admitted to a palliative care ward.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational study using palliative care outcomes collaboration instruments was conducted from July 2021 to September 2023.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>The study included 755 terminally ill patients admitted to a palliative ward in Taiwan. Pain was assessed daily using the symptom assessment scale for patient-reported pain and the palliative care problem severity score for clinician-assessed pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 755 palliative care patients (median age = 69 years; 59.3% female), 181 were classified into the different group and 574 into the similar group based on initial patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain scores. Patients in the different group were younger, had a higher proportion of cancer diagnoses, and reported significantly higher levels of pain, fatigue, bowel problems, and difficulty sleeping. In multivariate analysis, bowel problems were the only independent factor associated with being in the different group (odds ratio = 1.07; 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.14; <i>p</i> = 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients in the different group exhibited greater symptom burden compared to those in the similar group, particularly in pain, fatigue, and bowel problems. Bowel problems independently predicted differences between patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain scores. These results indicate that differences in pain assessment are linked to the severity and complexity of physical symptoms, reinforcing the need for comprehensive, symptom-based evaluations in palliative care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1010-1017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251363482\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251363482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:姑息治疗中的疼痛评估是必不可少的,但患者报告和临床评估疼痛之间的差异会影响护理决策。确定导致这些差异的因素可以改善疼痛管理。目的:探讨与姑息治疗病房患者自述疼痛和临床评估疼痛差异相关的临床和症状相关因素。设计:从2021年7月至2023年9月,采用姑息治疗结果协作工具进行回顾性观察性研究。环境/参与者:本研究包括755名台湾姑息病房的末期病人。每日使用患者报告疼痛的症状评估量表和临床评估疼痛的姑息治疗问题严重程度评分来评估疼痛。结果:在755例姑息治疗患者中(中位年龄69岁,女性59.3%),根据患者最初报告和临床评估的疼痛评分,181例被分为不同组,574例被分为相似组。另一组的患者更年轻,癌症诊断比例更高,疼痛、疲劳、肠道问题和睡眠困难的程度也明显更高。在多变量分析中,肠道问题是与不同组相关的唯一独立因素(优势比= 1.07;95%可信区间= 1.01-1.14;p = 0.025)。结论:与同类组相比,不同组的患者表现出更大的症状负担,特别是在疼痛、疲劳和肠道问题上。肠道问题独立预测了患者报告和临床评估疼痛评分之间的差异。这些结果表明,疼痛评估的差异与身体症状的严重程度和复杂性有关,这加强了在姑息治疗中进行全面、基于症状的评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain in hospitalized palliative ward patients: A retrospective observational study.

Background: Pain assessment in palliative care is essential, but differences between patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain can affect care decisions. Identifying factors contributing to these differences can improve pain management.

Aim: To investigate the clinical and symptom-related factors associated with variations between patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain among patients admitted to a palliative care ward.

Design: A retrospective observational study using palliative care outcomes collaboration instruments was conducted from July 2021 to September 2023.

Setting/participants: The study included 755 terminally ill patients admitted to a palliative ward in Taiwan. Pain was assessed daily using the symptom assessment scale for patient-reported pain and the palliative care problem severity score for clinician-assessed pain.

Results: Among 755 palliative care patients (median age = 69 years; 59.3% female), 181 were classified into the different group and 574 into the similar group based on initial patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain scores. Patients in the different group were younger, had a higher proportion of cancer diagnoses, and reported significantly higher levels of pain, fatigue, bowel problems, and difficulty sleeping. In multivariate analysis, bowel problems were the only independent factor associated with being in the different group (odds ratio = 1.07; 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.14; p = 0.025).

Conclusions: Patients in the different group exhibited greater symptom burden compared to those in the similar group, particularly in pain, fatigue, and bowel problems. Bowel problems independently predicted differences between patient-reported and clinician-assessed pain scores. These results indicate that differences in pain assessment are linked to the severity and complexity of physical symptoms, reinforcing the need for comprehensive, symptom-based evaluations in palliative care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信