免疫检查点抑制剂治疗头颈癌患者的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Research Pub Date : 2025-08-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.32604/or.2025.065911
Jiao Li, Nurhayu Ab Rahman, Suharni Mohamad, Guang Yang, Caixia Zhao
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂治疗头颈癌患者的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Jiao Li, Nurhayu Ab Rahman, Suharni Mohamad, Guang Yang, Caixia Zhao","doi":"10.32604/or.2025.065911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved outcomes in a number of malignancies. To determine the most effective course of treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), this systematic review evaluated the efficacy of several therapeutic approaches based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive evaluation of the literature was conducted, looking at randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were published in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials since database establishment. The risk of bias of the enrolled studies was analyzed using The Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4. Using network meta-analyses (NMA), the relative treatment effects on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from qualifying randomized controlled trials were synthesized and evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding OS, compared with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, chemotherapy (Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.1, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.2, 3.4) showed a treatment disadvantage. Meanwhile, nivolumab plus chemotherapy may represent the most efficient (57.89%) and has a lower cost among all the treatments enrolled in this study for advanced HNSCC. Regarding PFS, compared with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy (HR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8) showed treatment superiority. Additionally, nivolumab plus chemotherapy (77.18%) has the longest PFS among all interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Taking into account OS and PFS, the combination of nivolumab plus chemotherapy may appear to be the most effective option and is associated with a comparatively lower cost among all treatments included in this network meta-analysis, thereby recommending its use as a first-line therapy for HNSCC.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>INPLASY (2024070073).</p>","PeriodicalId":19537,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research","volume":"33 9","pages":"2263-2278"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiao Li, Nurhayu Ab Rahman, Suharni Mohamad, Guang Yang, Caixia Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.32604/or.2025.065911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved outcomes in a number of malignancies. To determine the most effective course of treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), this systematic review evaluated the efficacy of several therapeutic approaches based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive evaluation of the literature was conducted, looking at randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were published in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials since database establishment. The risk of bias of the enrolled studies was analyzed using The Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4. Using network meta-analyses (NMA), the relative treatment effects on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from qualifying randomized controlled trials were synthesized and evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding OS, compared with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, chemotherapy (Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.1, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.2, 3.4) showed a treatment disadvantage. Meanwhile, nivolumab plus chemotherapy may represent the most efficient (57.89%) and has a lower cost among all the treatments enrolled in this study for advanced HNSCC. Regarding PFS, compared with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy (HR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8) showed treatment superiority. Additionally, nivolumab plus chemotherapy (77.18%) has the longest PFS among all interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Taking into account OS and PFS, the combination of nivolumab plus chemotherapy may appear to be the most effective option and is associated with a comparatively lower cost among all treatments included in this network meta-analysis, thereby recommending its use as a first-line therapy for HNSCC.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>INPLASY (2024070073).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology Research\",\"volume\":\"33 9\",\"pages\":\"2263-2278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408847/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32604/or.2025.065911\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32604/or.2025.065911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:检查点抑制剂显著改善了许多恶性肿瘤的预后。为了确定头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)最有效的治疗方案,本系统综述评估了几种基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的治疗方法的疗效。方法:对文献进行综合评估,查看自数据库建立以来发表在Embase、PubMed和Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials上的随机对照试验(RCTs)。使用The Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4对入组研究的偏倚风险进行分析。使用网络荟萃分析(NMA),综合和评估符合条件的随机对照试验对总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的相对治疗效果。结果:在OS方面,与纳武单抗联合化疗相比,化疗(风险比(HR) = 2.1, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.2, 3.4)表现出治疗劣势。同时,在本研究纳入的所有治疗方案中,纳武单抗联合化疗可能是治疗晚期HNSCC最有效(57.89%)且成本较低的方法。在PFS方面,与纳武单抗联合伊匹单抗相比,纳武单抗联合化疗(HR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8)具有治疗优势。此外,在所有干预措施中,纳武单抗联合化疗(77.18%)的PFS最长。结论:考虑到OS和PFS,在本网络荟萃分析中包括的所有治疗方法中,纳武单抗联合化疗可能是最有效的选择,并且成本相对较低,因此推荐将其作为HNSCC的一线治疗方法。注册:INPLASY(2024070073)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: Checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved outcomes in a number of malignancies. To determine the most effective course of treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), this systematic review evaluated the efficacy of several therapeutic approaches based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods: A comprehensive evaluation of the literature was conducted, looking at randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were published in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials since database establishment. The risk of bias of the enrolled studies was analyzed using The Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4. Using network meta-analyses (NMA), the relative treatment effects on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from qualifying randomized controlled trials were synthesized and evaluated.

Results: Regarding OS, compared with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, chemotherapy (Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.1, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.2, 3.4) showed a treatment disadvantage. Meanwhile, nivolumab plus chemotherapy may represent the most efficient (57.89%) and has a lower cost among all the treatments enrolled in this study for advanced HNSCC. Regarding PFS, compared with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy (HR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8) showed treatment superiority. Additionally, nivolumab plus chemotherapy (77.18%) has the longest PFS among all interventions.

Conclusion: Taking into account OS and PFS, the combination of nivolumab plus chemotherapy may appear to be the most effective option and is associated with a comparatively lower cost among all treatments included in this network meta-analysis, thereby recommending its use as a first-line therapy for HNSCC.

Registration: INPLASY (2024070073).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology Research
Oncology Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Oncology Research Featuring Preclinical and Clincal Cancer Therapeutics publishes research of the highest quality that contributes to an understanding of cancer in areas of molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, biophysics, genetics, biology, endocrinology, and immunology, as well as studies on the mechanism of action of carcinogens and therapeutic agents, reports dealing with cancer prevention and epidemiology, and clinical trials delineating effective new therapeutic regimens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信