腹股沟疝修补术在腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术中的手术意义。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Abdullah Golbasi, Omer Sahin, Murat Keske, Huseyin Bicer, Burak Elmaagac, Mert Ali Karadag
{"title":"腹股沟疝修补术在腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术中的手术意义。","authors":"Abdullah Golbasi, Omer Sahin, Murat Keske, Huseyin Bicer, Burak Elmaagac, Mert Ali Karadag","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is a common procedure, and patients with a history of IHR may later require radical prostatectomy. Prior IHR can complicate prostatectomy by altering anatomy, but its impact on extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (ELRP) remains unclear. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of ELRP in patients with prior IHR.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study included male patients aged 40-80 who underwent ELRP for localized prostate cancer between 2019 and 2024. Patients were stratified into two groups based on prior IHR status (group 1: without IHR; group 2: with IHR). Comparative analyses were performed on demographic data, perioperative metrics, and oncological outcomes to assess the impact of prior IHR on ELRP. Statistical significance was accepted as <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 255 patients (group 1: 220, group 2: 35) were included. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of age and demographic characteristics. However, the operation duration was longer in group 2 (194.86 vs 176.87 minutes, <i>P</i> = .002), and peritoneal opening occurred more frequently (34.3% vs 9.1%, <i>P</i> < .001). There was no significant difference in the rates of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) (25.9% vs 28.5%, <i>P</i> = .149).</p><p><strong>Concluison: </strong>ELRP outcomes in patients with a history of IHR are similar to standard ELRP. However, when planning surgery for this group, the risk of peritoneal opening, prolonged operation time, and the careful execution of lymph node dissection should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Implications of Prior Inguinal Hernia Repair in Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Golbasi, Omer Sahin, Murat Keske, Huseyin Bicer, Burak Elmaagac, Mert Ali Karadag\",\"doi\":\"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is a common procedure, and patients with a history of IHR may later require radical prostatectomy. Prior IHR can complicate prostatectomy by altering anatomy, but its impact on extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (ELRP) remains unclear. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of ELRP in patients with prior IHR.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study included male patients aged 40-80 who underwent ELRP for localized prostate cancer between 2019 and 2024. Patients were stratified into two groups based on prior IHR status (group 1: without IHR; group 2: with IHR). Comparative analyses were performed on demographic data, perioperative metrics, and oncological outcomes to assess the impact of prior IHR on ELRP. Statistical significance was accepted as <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 255 patients (group 1: 220, group 2: 35) were included. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of age and demographic characteristics. However, the operation duration was longer in group 2 (194.86 vs 176.87 minutes, <i>P</i> = .002), and peritoneal opening occurred more frequently (34.3% vs 9.1%, <i>P</i> < .001). There was no significant difference in the rates of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) (25.9% vs 28.5%, <i>P</i> = .149).</p><p><strong>Concluison: </strong>ELRP outcomes in patients with a history of IHR are similar to standard ELRP. However, when planning surgery for this group, the risk of peritoneal opening, prolonged operation time, and the careful execution of lymph node dissection should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409708/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)是一种常见的手术,有IHR病史的患者可能需要根治性前列腺切除术。先前的IHR可通过改变解剖结构使前列腺切除术复杂化,但其对腹腔外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(ELRP)的影响尚不清楚。本研究评估了ELRP在既往IHR患者中的可行性和结果。材料和方法:本回顾性横断面研究纳入了2019年至2024年间因局限性前列腺癌接受ELRP治疗的40-80岁男性患者。根据先前的《国际卫生条例》状况将患者分为两组(1组:无《国际卫生条例》;2组:有《国际卫生条例》)。对人口统计数据、围手术期指标和肿瘤结果进行比较分析,以评估既往IHR对ELRP的影响。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:共纳入255例患者(1组220例,2组35例)。在年龄和人口统计学特征方面,各组之间没有发现显著差异。但2组手术时间更长(194.86 vs 176.87 min, P = 0.002),腹膜开口发生率更高(34.3% vs 9.1%, P < 0.001)。盆腔淋巴结清扫率(PLND)两组比较差异无统计学意义(25.9% vs 28.5%, P = 0.149)。结论:有IHR病史患者的ELRP结果与标准ELRP相似。但本组患者在计划手术时,应考虑腹膜开放的风险、延长手术时间和仔细执行淋巴结清扫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Implications of Prior Inguinal Hernia Repair in Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy.

Background: Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is a common procedure, and patients with a history of IHR may later require radical prostatectomy. Prior IHR can complicate prostatectomy by altering anatomy, but its impact on extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (ELRP) remains unclear. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of ELRP in patients with prior IHR.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included male patients aged 40-80 who underwent ELRP for localized prostate cancer between 2019 and 2024. Patients were stratified into two groups based on prior IHR status (group 1: without IHR; group 2: with IHR). Comparative analyses were performed on demographic data, perioperative metrics, and oncological outcomes to assess the impact of prior IHR on ELRP. Statistical significance was accepted as P < .05.

Results: A total of 255 patients (group 1: 220, group 2: 35) were included. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of age and demographic characteristics. However, the operation duration was longer in group 2 (194.86 vs 176.87 minutes, P = .002), and peritoneal opening occurred more frequently (34.3% vs 9.1%, P < .001). There was no significant difference in the rates of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) (25.9% vs 28.5%, P = .149).

Concluison: ELRP outcomes in patients with a history of IHR are similar to standard ELRP. However, when planning surgery for this group, the risk of peritoneal opening, prolonged operation time, and the careful execution of lymph node dissection should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信