Vincent R Lanting, Floris T M Bosch, Emily S L Martens, Pieter W Kamphuisen, Stefano Barco, Ramón Lecumberri, Hans-Martin Otten, Francesca Schieppati, Corrado Lodigiani, María Barca-Hernando, Elena Campello, Frederikus A Klok, Luis Jara-Palomares, Ettore Porreca, Harry R Büller, Nick van Es, Marcello Di Nisio
{"title":"癌症患者抗凝治疗期间静脉血栓栓塞复发的管理:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Vincent R Lanting, Floris T M Bosch, Emily S L Martens, Pieter W Kamphuisen, Stefano Barco, Ramón Lecumberri, Hans-Martin Otten, Francesca Schieppati, Corrado Lodigiani, María Barca-Hernando, Elena Campello, Frederikus A Klok, Luis Jara-Palomares, Ettore Porreca, Harry R Büller, Nick van Es, Marcello Di Nisio","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.08.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with cancer-associated VTE. Limited data are available on treatment, particularly in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate current management strategies and outcomes in patients with cancer and recurrent VTE during treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or DOACs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an international, prospective, observational cohort study. Patients were treated according to local practice, although the study protocol encouraged the use of a dose-escalation strategy in accordance with current clinical guidelines. Primary outcomes were second recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 2020 and November 2024, 94 patients were enrolled, of whom 81 were included in the final analysis. At the time of recurrent VTE, 55% of patients were treated with a DOAC, 41% with therapeutic-dose LMWH, and 4% with maintenance-dose LMWH. Of DOAC-treated patients, 51% switched to supratherapeutic-dose LMWH, 42% to therapeutic-dose LMWH, and 7% received other treatments. Of LMWH-treated patients, 70% received dose escalation, 18% maintained the same dose, and 12% received other treatments. At the 3-month follow-up, 10% had developed a second recurrence, 12% clinically relevant bleeding, and 20% died. VTE incidence was similar between patients receiving dose escalation and those maintained on therapeutic doses, while clinically relevant bleeding was more frequent in the latter (6% vs 25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of second recurrent VTE was substantial despite two-thirds of patients receiving dose escalation. Bleeding was common regardless of treatment intensity, underscoring the challenges in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of recurrent venous thromboembolism during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Vincent R Lanting, Floris T M Bosch, Emily S L Martens, Pieter W Kamphuisen, Stefano Barco, Ramón Lecumberri, Hans-Martin Otten, Francesca Schieppati, Corrado Lodigiani, María Barca-Hernando, Elena Campello, Frederikus A Klok, Luis Jara-Palomares, Ettore Porreca, Harry R Büller, Nick van Es, Marcello Di Nisio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.08.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with cancer-associated VTE. Limited data are available on treatment, particularly in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate current management strategies and outcomes in patients with cancer and recurrent VTE during treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or DOACs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an international, prospective, observational cohort study. Patients were treated according to local practice, although the study protocol encouraged the use of a dose-escalation strategy in accordance with current clinical guidelines. Primary outcomes were second recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 2020 and November 2024, 94 patients were enrolled, of whom 81 were included in the final analysis. At the time of recurrent VTE, 55% of patients were treated with a DOAC, 41% with therapeutic-dose LMWH, and 4% with maintenance-dose LMWH. Of DOAC-treated patients, 51% switched to supratherapeutic-dose LMWH, 42% to therapeutic-dose LMWH, and 7% received other treatments. Of LMWH-treated patients, 70% received dose escalation, 18% maintained the same dose, and 12% received other treatments. At the 3-month follow-up, 10% had developed a second recurrence, 12% clinically relevant bleeding, and 20% died. VTE incidence was similar between patients receiving dose escalation and those maintained on therapeutic doses, while clinically relevant bleeding was more frequent in the latter (6% vs 25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of second recurrent VTE was substantial despite two-thirds of patients receiving dose escalation. Bleeding was common regardless of treatment intensity, underscoring the challenges in this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.08.022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.08.022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of recurrent venous thromboembolism during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study.
Background: Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with cancer-associated VTE. Limited data are available on treatment, particularly in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
Objectives: We aimed to evaluate current management strategies and outcomes in patients with cancer and recurrent VTE during treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or DOACs.
Methods: This was an international, prospective, observational cohort study. Patients were treated according to local practice, although the study protocol encouraged the use of a dose-escalation strategy in accordance with current clinical guidelines. Primary outcomes were second recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding.
Results: Between June 2020 and November 2024, 94 patients were enrolled, of whom 81 were included in the final analysis. At the time of recurrent VTE, 55% of patients were treated with a DOAC, 41% with therapeutic-dose LMWH, and 4% with maintenance-dose LMWH. Of DOAC-treated patients, 51% switched to supratherapeutic-dose LMWH, 42% to therapeutic-dose LMWH, and 7% received other treatments. Of LMWH-treated patients, 70% received dose escalation, 18% maintained the same dose, and 12% received other treatments. At the 3-month follow-up, 10% had developed a second recurrence, 12% clinically relevant bleeding, and 20% died. VTE incidence was similar between patients receiving dose escalation and those maintained on therapeutic doses, while clinically relevant bleeding was more frequent in the latter (6% vs 25%).
Conclusion: The risk of second recurrent VTE was substantial despite two-thirds of patients receiving dose escalation. Bleeding was common regardless of treatment intensity, underscoring the challenges in this patient population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community.
Types of Publications:
The journal publishes a variety of content, including:
Original research reports
State-of-the-art reviews
Brief reports
Case reports
Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal
Forum articles
Correspondence
Announcements
Scope of Contributions:
Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include:
Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis
Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis
Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms
Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases
Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.