男同性恋、女同性恋和异性恋、顺性成年人的性暴力发生率比较。

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s13178-024-01030-2
R E Anderson, D M Piggott, B A Feinstein, C Dyar
{"title":"男同性恋、女同性恋和异性恋、顺性成年人的性暴力发生率比较。","authors":"R E Anderson, D M Piggott, B A Feinstein, C Dyar","doi":"10.1007/s13178-024-01030-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>LGBTQ+ individuals are more vulnerable to experiencing sexual victimization. To truly prevent sexual victimization, preventing perpetration is necessary. The goal of this study was to increase the inclusivity of sexual violence research by examining the rates of sexual violence perpetration among cisgender, monosexual (e.g., attracted to a single gender, heterosexual or gay/lesbian) adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 828 adult Amazon Mechanical Turk workers who completed the study between March and September 2018. Participants completed the short version of the Post-Refusal Sexual Persistence Scale - Perpetration as part of a larger experiment. Analyses compared four gender by sexual identity groups: heterosexual women (31.5%), heterosexual men (27.8%), lesbian women (21.1%), and gay men (19.6%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were group differences in reported perpetration rates. Perpetration rates were higher in both groups of men (heterosexual = 33.0%, gay = 35.0%) compared to both groups of women (heterosexual = 12.6%, lesbian = 20.5%), but rates did not differ within gender. Among the subsample with perpetration histories, heterosexual men were more likely to report using verbal coercion tactics (52.0%) than the other groups (45.5% [heterosexual women], 31.6% [gay men], 30.6% [lesbian women]), and heterosexual women were more likely to report using both verbal coercion and physical force in combination (24.2%) than gay men (5.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>There are gender-driven differences in the rate of sexual violence perpetration among monosexual adults, suggesting the need for population-specific prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47654,"journal":{"name":"Sexuality Research and Social Policy","volume":"22 3","pages":"1158-1168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Sexual Violence Perpetration Rates Among Gay, Lesbian and Heterosexual Cisgender Adults.\",\"authors\":\"R E Anderson, D M Piggott, B A Feinstein, C Dyar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13178-024-01030-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>LGBTQ+ individuals are more vulnerable to experiencing sexual victimization. To truly prevent sexual victimization, preventing perpetration is necessary. The goal of this study was to increase the inclusivity of sexual violence research by examining the rates of sexual violence perpetration among cisgender, monosexual (e.g., attracted to a single gender, heterosexual or gay/lesbian) adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 828 adult Amazon Mechanical Turk workers who completed the study between March and September 2018. Participants completed the short version of the Post-Refusal Sexual Persistence Scale - Perpetration as part of a larger experiment. Analyses compared four gender by sexual identity groups: heterosexual women (31.5%), heterosexual men (27.8%), lesbian women (21.1%), and gay men (19.6%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were group differences in reported perpetration rates. Perpetration rates were higher in both groups of men (heterosexual = 33.0%, gay = 35.0%) compared to both groups of women (heterosexual = 12.6%, lesbian = 20.5%), but rates did not differ within gender. Among the subsample with perpetration histories, heterosexual men were more likely to report using verbal coercion tactics (52.0%) than the other groups (45.5% [heterosexual women], 31.6% [gay men], 30.6% [lesbian women]), and heterosexual women were more likely to report using both verbal coercion and physical force in combination (24.2%) than gay men (5.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>There are gender-driven differences in the rate of sexual violence perpetration among monosexual adults, suggesting the need for population-specific prevention efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexuality Research and Social Policy\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"1158-1168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411572/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexuality Research and Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-024-01030-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexuality Research and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-024-01030-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:LGBTQ+个体更容易遭受性侵害。要真正防止性侵害,预防犯罪是必要的。本研究的目的是通过调查异性恋、单性恋(例如,被单一性别吸引、异性恋或男同性恋/女同性恋)成年人的性暴力发生率,来增加性暴力研究的包容性。方法:参与者是828名成年亚马逊土耳其机械工人,他们在2018年3月至9月期间完成了这项研究。参与者完成了一份简短的“拒绝后性坚持量表——犯罪”,作为一个更大实验的一部分。分析比较了四种性别的性别认同群体:异性恋女性(31.5%)、异性恋男性(27.8%)、女同性恋(21.1%)和男同性恋(19.6%)。结果:报告的犯罪率存在组间差异。与两组女性(异性恋= 12.6%,女同性恋= 20.5%)相比,两组男性(异性恋= 33.0%,男同性恋= 35.0%)的犯罪率更高,但在性别之间没有差异。在有犯罪史的子样本中,异性恋男性比其他群体(45.5%[异性恋女性],31.6%[男同性恋者],30.6%[女同性恋者])更有可能使用言语胁迫策略(52.0%),异性恋女性比男同性恋者(5.3%)更有可能使用言语胁迫和肢体暴力相结合(24.2%)。结论和启示:单性恋成年人的性暴力发生率存在性别差异,这表明需要针对特定人群采取预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Sexual Violence Perpetration Rates Among Gay, Lesbian and Heterosexual Cisgender Adults.

Introduction: LGBTQ+ individuals are more vulnerable to experiencing sexual victimization. To truly prevent sexual victimization, preventing perpetration is necessary. The goal of this study was to increase the inclusivity of sexual violence research by examining the rates of sexual violence perpetration among cisgender, monosexual (e.g., attracted to a single gender, heterosexual or gay/lesbian) adults.

Methods: Participants were 828 adult Amazon Mechanical Turk workers who completed the study between March and September 2018. Participants completed the short version of the Post-Refusal Sexual Persistence Scale - Perpetration as part of a larger experiment. Analyses compared four gender by sexual identity groups: heterosexual women (31.5%), heterosexual men (27.8%), lesbian women (21.1%), and gay men (19.6%).

Results: There were group differences in reported perpetration rates. Perpetration rates were higher in both groups of men (heterosexual = 33.0%, gay = 35.0%) compared to both groups of women (heterosexual = 12.6%, lesbian = 20.5%), but rates did not differ within gender. Among the subsample with perpetration histories, heterosexual men were more likely to report using verbal coercion tactics (52.0%) than the other groups (45.5% [heterosexual women], 31.6% [gay men], 30.6% [lesbian women]), and heterosexual women were more likely to report using both verbal coercion and physical force in combination (24.2%) than gay men (5.3%).

Conclusions and implications: There are gender-driven differences in the rate of sexual violence perpetration among monosexual adults, suggesting the need for population-specific prevention efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
Sexuality Research and Social Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Sexuality Research and Social Policy is an international multidisciplinary forum for the publication of original peer-reviewed state-of-the-art empirical research on sexuality, theoretical and methodological discussions, and the implications of this evidence for policies across the globe regarding sexual health, sexuality education, and sexual rights in diverse communities. The journal also publishes brief research and conference reports; white papers; book, film, and other reviews; together with guest editorials and commentaries. Sexuality Research and Social Policy occasionally publishes special issues on timely topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信