采用格子结构改良上下开窗经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的减沉降效果。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Biomedical Engineering Letters Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s13534-025-00494-4
Junsu Bae, Hyeonsu Bae, Hae Won Choi, Kyeong-Joo Yoo, Hyung-Youl Park, Jun-Seok Lee, Dohyung Lim
{"title":"采用格子结构改良上下开窗经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的减沉降效果。","authors":"Junsu Bae, Hyeonsu Bae, Hae Won Choi, Kyeong-Joo Yoo, Hyung-Youl Park, Jun-Seok Lee, Dohyung Lim","doi":"10.1007/s13534-025-00494-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cage subsidence is a common complication following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) that can lead to poor clinical outcomes, including recurrent pain and segmental instability. Conventional TLIF cage designs often fail to distribute stress evenly, increasing the risk of endplate damage and subsequent subsidence. This study aims to evaluate the effect of a modified TLIF cage with upper and lower open windows (lattice structure) in reducing cage subsidence in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD). A finite element (FE) model of the lumbar spine was developed and validated. Three TLIF cage designs (Open, Lattice, Closed) were simulated under various loading conditions (flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation), and von Mises stresses were analyzed within the TLIFs, endplates, and cancellous bone. The FE model demonstrated ROMs consistent with cadaveric studies. Elevated stresses were found in all cages, especially Open and Closed designs. The Lattice TLIF showed improved stress distribution, reducing peak stress on endplates. However, increased contact area had a limited effect on reducing subsidence under physiological loads. While contact area alone does not significantly mitigate subsidence risk, incorporating lattice structures may enhance resistance to physiological stress. These findings suggest that optimized TLIF designs integrating lattice structures can improve stability and reduce the likelihood of subsidence, leading to better clinical outcomes (e.g., reduced pain, improved fusion success, long-term stability) in LDDD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46898,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","volume":"15 5","pages":"951-962"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subsidence reduction effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with upper and lower open windows modified with lattice structure.\",\"authors\":\"Junsu Bae, Hyeonsu Bae, Hae Won Choi, Kyeong-Joo Yoo, Hyung-Youl Park, Jun-Seok Lee, Dohyung Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13534-025-00494-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cage subsidence is a common complication following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) that can lead to poor clinical outcomes, including recurrent pain and segmental instability. Conventional TLIF cage designs often fail to distribute stress evenly, increasing the risk of endplate damage and subsequent subsidence. This study aims to evaluate the effect of a modified TLIF cage with upper and lower open windows (lattice structure) in reducing cage subsidence in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD). A finite element (FE) model of the lumbar spine was developed and validated. Three TLIF cage designs (Open, Lattice, Closed) were simulated under various loading conditions (flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation), and von Mises stresses were analyzed within the TLIFs, endplates, and cancellous bone. The FE model demonstrated ROMs consistent with cadaveric studies. Elevated stresses were found in all cages, especially Open and Closed designs. The Lattice TLIF showed improved stress distribution, reducing peak stress on endplates. However, increased contact area had a limited effect on reducing subsidence under physiological loads. While contact area alone does not significantly mitigate subsidence risk, incorporating lattice structures may enhance resistance to physiological stress. These findings suggest that optimized TLIF designs integrating lattice structures can improve stability and reduce the likelihood of subsidence, leading to better clinical outcomes (e.g., reduced pain, improved fusion success, long-term stability) in LDDD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"951-962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411363/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-025-00494-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-025-00494-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)后,椎笼下沉是一种常见的并发症,可导致不良的临床结果,包括复发性疼痛和节段性不稳定。传统的tliff保持架设计往往不能均匀分配应力,增加了端板损伤和随后下沉的风险。本研究旨在评估上下开窗(格子结构)的改良TLIF笼在腰椎退行性椎间盘疾病(LDDD)患者中减少笼沉降的效果。建立并验证了腰椎的有限元模型。模拟了三种TLIF笼设计(开放式、点式和封闭式)在不同载荷条件下(屈伸、侧弯、轴向旋转)的变化,并分析了TLIF、终板和松质骨内的von Mises应力。有限元模型显示ROMs与尸体研究一致。在所有笼子中都发现了较高的应力,特别是开放式和封闭式设计。点阵TLIF改善了应力分布,降低了端板上的峰值应力。然而,增加接触面积对减少生理负荷下的沉降效果有限。虽然接触面积本身并不能显著降低沉降风险,但结合点阵结构可以增强对生理应力的抵抗力。这些研究结果表明,整合晶格结构的优化TLIF设计可以提高LDDD患者的稳定性并减少下沉的可能性,从而获得更好的临床结果(例如减轻疼痛、提高融合成功率和长期稳定性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subsidence reduction effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with upper and lower open windows modified with lattice structure.

Cage subsidence is a common complication following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) that can lead to poor clinical outcomes, including recurrent pain and segmental instability. Conventional TLIF cage designs often fail to distribute stress evenly, increasing the risk of endplate damage and subsequent subsidence. This study aims to evaluate the effect of a modified TLIF cage with upper and lower open windows (lattice structure) in reducing cage subsidence in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD). A finite element (FE) model of the lumbar spine was developed and validated. Three TLIF cage designs (Open, Lattice, Closed) were simulated under various loading conditions (flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation), and von Mises stresses were analyzed within the TLIFs, endplates, and cancellous bone. The FE model demonstrated ROMs consistent with cadaveric studies. Elevated stresses were found in all cages, especially Open and Closed designs. The Lattice TLIF showed improved stress distribution, reducing peak stress on endplates. However, increased contact area had a limited effect on reducing subsidence under physiological loads. While contact area alone does not significantly mitigate subsidence risk, incorporating lattice structures may enhance resistance to physiological stress. These findings suggest that optimized TLIF designs integrating lattice structures can improve stability and reduce the likelihood of subsidence, leading to better clinical outcomes (e.g., reduced pain, improved fusion success, long-term stability) in LDDD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Engineering Letters
Biomedical Engineering Letters ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Biomedical Engineering Letters (BMEL) aims to present the innovative experimental science and technological development in the biomedical field as well as clinical application of new development. The article must contain original biomedical engineering content, defined as development, theoretical analysis, and evaluation/validation of a new technique. BMEL publishes the following types of papers: original articles, review articles, editorials, and letters to the editor. All the papers are reviewed in single-blind fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信