Patrick Rogers, Ellen Parker, Marco Marangoni, Ian R MacDonald, Cha-Ney Kim, Eef J Hendriks, David Volders
{"title":"CTA和DSA在MCA M1闭塞中的血管直径测量差异：一项观察者间研究。","authors":"Patrick Rogers, Ellen Parker, Marco Marangoni, Ian R MacDonald, Cha-Ney Kim, Eef J Hendriks, David Volders","doi":"10.1177/08465371251356908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate vessel measurement is essential in endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke. Discrepancies between computed tomography angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) may impact procedural planning and device selection. This study compares vessel diameter measurements from CTA and DSA in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 occlusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective study, 90 consecutive patients who underwent EVT for MCA M1 occlusions between February 2020 and March 2024 were included. Vessel diameters were independently measured by 3 neuroradiologists using CTA and DSA (pre- and post-intervention). Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CTA consistently overestimated vessel diameter compared to DSA. The mean M1 diameter was 2.29 ± 0.27 mm on CTA and 2.16 ± 0.30 mm on pre-EVT DSA (<i>P</i> < .001), with a median difference of 0.4 mm (IQR: 0.2-0.6 mm). In 70% of cases, CTA values exceeded DSA. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed a mean difference of +0.13 mm (limits of agreement: -0.25 to +0.51 mm). No significant change was observed between pre- and post-EVT DSA measurements (<i>P</i> = .103). Clot-side M1 segments were significantly smaller than contralateral measurements on CTA (<i>P</i> = .003). Inter-rater agreement was good (ICC = .785).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CTA overestimates MCA M1 diameter relative to DSA. While the discrepancy is modest, it may influence device selection in borderline cases. Awareness of this variability is important, and further research is warranted to explore its clinical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":55290,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes","volume":" ","pages":"8465371251356908"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepancies in Vessel Diameter Measurements Between CTA and DSA in MCA M1 Occlusions: An Interobserver Study.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Rogers, Ellen Parker, Marco Marangoni, Ian R MacDonald, Cha-Ney Kim, Eef J Hendriks, David Volders\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08465371251356908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate vessel measurement is essential in endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke. Discrepancies between computed tomography angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) may impact procedural planning and device selection. This study compares vessel diameter measurements from CTA and DSA in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 occlusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective study, 90 consecutive patients who underwent EVT for MCA M1 occlusions between February 2020 and March 2024 were included. Vessel diameters were independently measured by 3 neuroradiologists using CTA and DSA (pre- and post-intervention). Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CTA consistently overestimated vessel diameter compared to DSA. The mean M1 diameter was 2.29 ± 0.27 mm on CTA and 2.16 ± 0.30 mm on pre-EVT DSA (<i>P</i> < .001), with a median difference of 0.4 mm (IQR: 0.2-0.6 mm). In 70% of cases, CTA values exceeded DSA. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed a mean difference of +0.13 mm (limits of agreement: -0.25 to +0.51 mm). No significant change was observed between pre- and post-EVT DSA measurements (<i>P</i> = .103). Clot-side M1 segments were significantly smaller than contralateral measurements on CTA (<i>P</i> = .003). Inter-rater agreement was good (ICC = .785).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CTA overestimates MCA M1 diameter relative to DSA. While the discrepancy is modest, it may influence device selection in borderline cases. Awareness of this variability is important, and further research is warranted to explore its clinical implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8465371251356908\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371251356908\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371251356908","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discrepancies in Vessel Diameter Measurements Between CTA and DSA in MCA M1 Occlusions: An Interobserver Study.
Purpose: Accurate vessel measurement is essential in endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke. Discrepancies between computed tomography angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) may impact procedural planning and device selection. This study compares vessel diameter measurements from CTA and DSA in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 occlusions.
Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 90 consecutive patients who underwent EVT for MCA M1 occlusions between February 2020 and March 2024 were included. Vessel diameters were independently measured by 3 neuroradiologists using CTA and DSA (pre- and post-intervention). Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results: CTA consistently overestimated vessel diameter compared to DSA. The mean M1 diameter was 2.29 ± 0.27 mm on CTA and 2.16 ± 0.30 mm on pre-EVT DSA (P < .001), with a median difference of 0.4 mm (IQR: 0.2-0.6 mm). In 70% of cases, CTA values exceeded DSA. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed a mean difference of +0.13 mm (limits of agreement: -0.25 to +0.51 mm). No significant change was observed between pre- and post-EVT DSA measurements (P = .103). Clot-side M1 segments were significantly smaller than contralateral measurements on CTA (P = .003). Inter-rater agreement was good (ICC = .785).
Conclusions: CTA overestimates MCA M1 diameter relative to DSA. While the discrepancy is modest, it may influence device selection in borderline cases. Awareness of this variability is important, and further research is warranted to explore its clinical implications.
期刊介绍：
The Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal is a peer-reviewed, Medline-indexed publication that presents a broad scientific review of radiology in Canada. The Journal covers such topics as abdominal imaging, cardiovascular radiology, computed tomography, continuing professional development, education and training, gastrointestinal radiology, health policy and practice, magnetic resonance imaging, musculoskeletal radiology, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, pediatric radiology, radiology history, radiology practice guidelines and advisories, thoracic and cardiac imaging, trauma and emergency room imaging, ultrasonography, and vascular and interventional radiology. Article types considered for publication include original research articles, critically appraised topics, review articles, guest editorials, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letter to the Editor.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
