Pooya Eini , Peyman Eini , Homa serpoush , Mohammad Rezayee , Jason Tremblay
{"title":"颈动脉斑块检测的机器学习模型:基于超声诊断性能的系统回顾。","authors":"Pooya Eini , Peyman Eini , Homa serpoush , Mohammad Rezayee , Jason Tremblay","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Carotid artery plaques, a hallmark of atherosclerosis, are key risk indicators for ischemic stroke, a major global health burden with 101 million cases and 6.65 million deaths in 2019. Early ultrasound detection is vital but hindered by manual analysis limitations. Machine learning (ML) offers a promising solution for automated plaque detection, yet its comparative performance is underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates ML models for carotid plaque detection using ultrasound.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and ProQuest for studies on ML-based carotid plaque detection with ultrasound, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies reported diagnostic metrics and used a reference standard. Data on study characteristics, ML models, and performance were extracted, with risk of bias assessed via PROBAST+AI. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, AUROC were calculated using STATA 18 with MIDAS and METADTA modules.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of ten studies, eight were meta-analyzed (200–19,751 patients) Best models showed a pooled sensitivity 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.97), specificity 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86–0.98), AUROC 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99), and DOR 302 (95% CI: 54–1684), with high heterogeneity (I² = 90%) and no publication bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ML models show promise in carotid plaque detection, supporting potential clinical integration for stroke prevention, though high heterogeneity and potential bias highlight the need for standardized validation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"34 11","pages":"Article 108446"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning models for carotid artery plaque detection: A systematic review of ultrasound-based diagnostic performance\",\"authors\":\"Pooya Eini , Peyman Eini , Homa serpoush , Mohammad Rezayee , Jason Tremblay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Carotid artery plaques, a hallmark of atherosclerosis, are key risk indicators for ischemic stroke, a major global health burden with 101 million cases and 6.65 million deaths in 2019. Early ultrasound detection is vital but hindered by manual analysis limitations. Machine learning (ML) offers a promising solution for automated plaque detection, yet its comparative performance is underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates ML models for carotid plaque detection using ultrasound.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and ProQuest for studies on ML-based carotid plaque detection with ultrasound, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies reported diagnostic metrics and used a reference standard. Data on study characteristics, ML models, and performance were extracted, with risk of bias assessed via PROBAST+AI. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, AUROC were calculated using STATA 18 with MIDAS and METADTA modules.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of ten studies, eight were meta-analyzed (200–19,751 patients) Best models showed a pooled sensitivity 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.97), specificity 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86–0.98), AUROC 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99), and DOR 302 (95% CI: 54–1684), with high heterogeneity (I² = 90%) and no publication bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ML models show promise in carotid plaque detection, supporting potential clinical integration for stroke prevention, though high heterogeneity and potential bias highlight the need for standardized validation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":\"34 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 108446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105230572500223X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105230572500223X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine learning models for carotid artery plaque detection: A systematic review of ultrasound-based diagnostic performance
Background
Carotid artery plaques, a hallmark of atherosclerosis, are key risk indicators for ischemic stroke, a major global health burden with 101 million cases and 6.65 million deaths in 2019. Early ultrasound detection is vital but hindered by manual analysis limitations. Machine learning (ML) offers a promising solution for automated plaque detection, yet its comparative performance is underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates ML models for carotid plaque detection using ultrasound.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and ProQuest for studies on ML-based carotid plaque detection with ultrasound, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies reported diagnostic metrics and used a reference standard. Data on study characteristics, ML models, and performance were extracted, with risk of bias assessed via PROBAST+AI. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, AUROC were calculated using STATA 18 with MIDAS and METADTA modules.
Results
Of ten studies, eight were meta-analyzed (200–19,751 patients) Best models showed a pooled sensitivity 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.97), specificity 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86–0.98), AUROC 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99), and DOR 302 (95% CI: 54–1684), with high heterogeneity (I² = 90%) and no publication bias.
Conclusion
ML models show promise in carotid plaque detection, supporting potential clinical integration for stroke prevention, though high heterogeneity and potential bias highlight the need for standardized validation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.