Rafael de Athayde Soares, Gabriel Souza Lorenzoni, Victor Galvão Pinheiro, Flávio Augusto Peixoto Aleixo, Teresa Cristina Alves Duarte, Valdeno Brito Neto, Edson Takamitsu Nakamura, Roberto Sacilotto
{"title":"覆盖支架与裸金属支架在血管内治疗主动脉髂闭塞性疾病的安全性和有效性的结果:单中心经验","authors":"Rafael de Athayde Soares, Gabriel Souza Lorenzoni, Victor Galvão Pinheiro, Flávio Augusto Peixoto Aleixo, Teresa Cristina Alves Duarte, Valdeno Brito Neto, Edson Takamitsu Nakamura, Roberto Sacilotto","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this paper was to compare the efficacy of covered stents (CSs) and bare metal stents (BMSs) in treating all types of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) and subsequently to analyze the risk factors associated with restenosis, limb salvage, and patency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included consecutive patients with AIOD who underwent aortoiliac angioplasty, and two groups of patients were evaluated: patients with AIOD submitted to endovascular treatment with the use of covered stents and bare metal stents. Patients with critical limb ischemia or incapacitating claudication who underwent aortoiliac angioplasty during the index period were eligible for the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 103 aortoiliac angioplasties were performed in 103 patients, with an initial technical success rate of 100%. Analyses were performed at 1800 days. Two groups of patients were evaluated: 33 patients (32%) submitted to endovascular treatment with covered stents and 70 patients (68%) with bare metal stents. The estimated primary patency rates at 1800 days were better for the covered stents group ( 91.7%) than the bare metal stents group (58.8%, p = 0.001). Moreover, the time freedom from reintervention rates at 1800 days were better for the covered stents group (90%) than the bare metal stents group (58.4%, p = 0.003). The limb salvage rates at 1800 days were 100% in the covered stents group and 85.3% in the bare metal stents group, p = 0.07. A Cox regression revealed that the primary patency rate was significantly worse in patients of the bare metal stents group (HR = 2,50, CI = 1.51-9.38, p = 0.019), conversely, concomitant common femoral endarterectomy was a protector factor for primary patency (HR = 0.906, CI = 0.022-0.754, p = 0.023). Moreover, arterial hypertension was associated with reduced survival rates at the Cox regression analysis (HR = 2.61, CI = 1.005-6.806, p = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the results of this study, we conclude that endovascular treatment with covered stents for AIOD has better outcomes regarding primary patency and freedom from reintervention rates than bare metal stents. Moreover, concomitant common femoral endarterectomy is a protective factor for better primary patency. Another important finding of this cohort is that arterial hypertension is associated with reduced survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of the safety and efficacy of covered stents versus bare-metal stents for Endovascular Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Single-Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael de Athayde Soares, Gabriel Souza Lorenzoni, Victor Galvão Pinheiro, Flávio Augusto Peixoto Aleixo, Teresa Cristina Alves Duarte, Valdeno Brito Neto, Edson Takamitsu Nakamura, Roberto Sacilotto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this paper was to compare the efficacy of covered stents (CSs) and bare metal stents (BMSs) in treating all types of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) and subsequently to analyze the risk factors associated with restenosis, limb salvage, and patency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included consecutive patients with AIOD who underwent aortoiliac angioplasty, and two groups of patients were evaluated: patients with AIOD submitted to endovascular treatment with the use of covered stents and bare metal stents. Patients with critical limb ischemia or incapacitating claudication who underwent aortoiliac angioplasty during the index period were eligible for the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 103 aortoiliac angioplasties were performed in 103 patients, with an initial technical success rate of 100%. Analyses were performed at 1800 days. Two groups of patients were evaluated: 33 patients (32%) submitted to endovascular treatment with covered stents and 70 patients (68%) with bare metal stents. The estimated primary patency rates at 1800 days were better for the covered stents group ( 91.7%) than the bare metal stents group (58.8%, p = 0.001). Moreover, the time freedom from reintervention rates at 1800 days were better for the covered stents group (90%) than the bare metal stents group (58.4%, p = 0.003). The limb salvage rates at 1800 days were 100% in the covered stents group and 85.3% in the bare metal stents group, p = 0.07. A Cox regression revealed that the primary patency rate was significantly worse in patients of the bare metal stents group (HR = 2,50, CI = 1.51-9.38, p = 0.019), conversely, concomitant common femoral endarterectomy was a protector factor for primary patency (HR = 0.906, CI = 0.022-0.754, p = 0.023). Moreover, arterial hypertension was associated with reduced survival rates at the Cox regression analysis (HR = 2.61, CI = 1.005-6.806, p = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the results of this study, we conclude that endovascular treatment with covered stents for AIOD has better outcomes regarding primary patency and freedom from reintervention rates than bare metal stents. Moreover, concomitant common femoral endarterectomy is a protective factor for better primary patency. Another important finding of this cohort is that arterial hypertension is associated with reduced survival rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本文的目的是比较覆盖支架(CSs)和裸金属支架(bms)治疗所有类型主动脉髂闭塞性疾病(AIOD)的疗效,并分析再狭窄、肢体保留和通畅的相关危险因素。方法:本前瞻性队列研究纳入连续行主动脉髂血管成形术的AIOD患者,并对两组患者进行评估:AIOD患者接受血管内治疗,使用覆盖支架和裸金属支架。在指标期内接受主动脉髂血管成形术的严重肢体缺血或失能性跛行患者符合研究条件。结果:103例患者共行103例主动脉髂血管成形术,初步技术成功率为100%。在1800天进行分析。对两组患者进行评估:33例(32%)患者接受血管内覆盖支架治疗,70例(68%)患者接受裸金属支架治疗。覆盖支架组1800天的初次通畅率(91.7%)优于裸金属支架组(58.8%,p = 0.001)。此外,覆盖支架组1800天的再干预时间自由率(90%)优于裸金属支架组(58.4%,p = 0.003)。覆盖支架组1800天肢体保留率为100%,裸金属支架组为85.3%,p = 0.07。Cox回归分析显示,裸体金属支架组患者的原发性通畅率明显较差(HR = 2,50, CI = 1.51 ~ 9.38, p = 0.019),相反,合并股总动脉内膜切除术是原发性通畅的保护因素(HR = 0.906, CI = 0.022 ~ 0.754, p = 0.023)。此外,在Cox回归分析中,动脉高血压与生存率降低相关(HR = 2.61, CI = 1.005-6.806, p = 0.049)。结论:基于本研究的结果,我们得出结论,与裸金属支架相比,血管内覆盖支架治疗AIOD在初次通畅和无再干预率方面具有更好的结果。此外,合并股总动脉内膜切除术是获得良好的原发性通畅的保护因素。该队列的另一个重要发现是动脉高血压与生存率降低有关。
Outcomes of the safety and efficacy of covered stents versus bare-metal stents for Endovascular Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Single-Center Experience.
Objectives: The purpose of this paper was to compare the efficacy of covered stents (CSs) and bare metal stents (BMSs) in treating all types of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) and subsequently to analyze the risk factors associated with restenosis, limb salvage, and patency.
Methods: This prospective cohort study included consecutive patients with AIOD who underwent aortoiliac angioplasty, and two groups of patients were evaluated: patients with AIOD submitted to endovascular treatment with the use of covered stents and bare metal stents. Patients with critical limb ischemia or incapacitating claudication who underwent aortoiliac angioplasty during the index period were eligible for the study.
Results: In total, 103 aortoiliac angioplasties were performed in 103 patients, with an initial technical success rate of 100%. Analyses were performed at 1800 days. Two groups of patients were evaluated: 33 patients (32%) submitted to endovascular treatment with covered stents and 70 patients (68%) with bare metal stents. The estimated primary patency rates at 1800 days were better for the covered stents group ( 91.7%) than the bare metal stents group (58.8%, p = 0.001). Moreover, the time freedom from reintervention rates at 1800 days were better for the covered stents group (90%) than the bare metal stents group (58.4%, p = 0.003). The limb salvage rates at 1800 days were 100% in the covered stents group and 85.3% in the bare metal stents group, p = 0.07. A Cox regression revealed that the primary patency rate was significantly worse in patients of the bare metal stents group (HR = 2,50, CI = 1.51-9.38, p = 0.019), conversely, concomitant common femoral endarterectomy was a protector factor for primary patency (HR = 0.906, CI = 0.022-0.754, p = 0.023). Moreover, arterial hypertension was associated with reduced survival rates at the Cox regression analysis (HR = 2.61, CI = 1.005-6.806, p = 0.049).
Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, we conclude that endovascular treatment with covered stents for AIOD has better outcomes regarding primary patency and freedom from reintervention rates than bare metal stents. Moreover, concomitant common femoral endarterectomy is a protective factor for better primary patency. Another important finding of this cohort is that arterial hypertension is associated with reduced survival rates.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal:
Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials)
Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work)
Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients)
General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic)
Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery
Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers)
Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery)
Editorials/Correspondence