ASAS关于报告轴性脊柱炎临床试验的建议。

IF 20.6 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Floris A van Gaalen, Victoria Navarro-Compán, Xenofon Baraliakos, Filip van den Bosch, Lianne S Gensler, Ihsane Hmamouchi, Robert Landewé, Pedro M Machado, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Valeria Rios Rodriguez, Denis Poddubnyy, Sofia Ramiro, Désirée van der Heijde
{"title":"ASAS关于报告轴性脊柱炎临床试验的建议。","authors":"Floris A van Gaalen, Victoria Navarro-Compán, Xenofon Baraliakos, Filip van den Bosch, Lianne S Gensler, Ihsane Hmamouchi, Robert Landewé, Pedro M Machado, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Valeria Rios Rodriguez, Denis Poddubnyy, Sofia Ramiro, Désirée van der Heijde","doi":"10.1016/j.ard.2025.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to develop recommendations on reporting baseline features and outcomes from axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) clinical trials based on the recently updated instrument set of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) core outcome set (COS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A steering group (SG) convened a workgroup (WG), consisting of 13 ASAS members including rheumatologists, methodologists, epidemiologists, and 2 Young ASAS members. Recommendations on reporting axSpA trials baseline features and outcomes were developed in 3 steps: (1) the SG identified relevant baseline features from key axSpA clinical trials and formulated a proposal on how outcomes related to the instruments in the ASAS COS should be presented. (2) The SG proposal was presented, discussed, and modified in WG meetings. (3) WG proposal was discussed and voted on by ASAS members during the 2024 annual ASAS workshop.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two baseline features relevant for all axSpA clinical trials and 8 additional features for disease-modifying drug trials were defined including descriptions on how to report them. Additionally, recommendations on how to report 20 trial outcomes at baseline and follow-up timepoints were put forward. Finally, recommendations on how to report 11 outcomes of instruments additionally endorsed by ASAS but not in the COS were formulated. Proposals for baseline features, COS outcomes, and outcomes not in COS were approved by ASAS members (with 84%, 85%, and 93% of members in favour, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These ASAS-endorsed recommendations on axSpA clinical trial reporting provide a standardised approach to reporting both baseline features as well as outcomes from axSpA clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ASAS recommendations on reporting axial spondyloarthritis clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Floris A van Gaalen, Victoria Navarro-Compán, Xenofon Baraliakos, Filip van den Bosch, Lianne S Gensler, Ihsane Hmamouchi, Robert Landewé, Pedro M Machado, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Valeria Rios Rodriguez, Denis Poddubnyy, Sofia Ramiro, Désirée van der Heijde\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ard.2025.07.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to develop recommendations on reporting baseline features and outcomes from axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) clinical trials based on the recently updated instrument set of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) core outcome set (COS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A steering group (SG) convened a workgroup (WG), consisting of 13 ASAS members including rheumatologists, methodologists, epidemiologists, and 2 Young ASAS members. Recommendations on reporting axSpA trials baseline features and outcomes were developed in 3 steps: (1) the SG identified relevant baseline features from key axSpA clinical trials and formulated a proposal on how outcomes related to the instruments in the ASAS COS should be presented. (2) The SG proposal was presented, discussed, and modified in WG meetings. (3) WG proposal was discussed and voted on by ASAS members during the 2024 annual ASAS workshop.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two baseline features relevant for all axSpA clinical trials and 8 additional features for disease-modifying drug trials were defined including descriptions on how to report them. Additionally, recommendations on how to report 20 trial outcomes at baseline and follow-up timepoints were put forward. Finally, recommendations on how to report 11 outcomes of instruments additionally endorsed by ASAS but not in the COS were formulated. Proposals for baseline features, COS outcomes, and outcomes not in COS were approved by ASAS members (with 84%, 85%, and 93% of members in favour, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These ASAS-endorsed recommendations on axSpA clinical trial reporting provide a standardised approach to reporting both baseline features as well as outcomes from axSpA clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.07.017\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.07.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在根据最近更新的国际脊柱关节炎评估协会(ASAS)核心结果集(COS)的工具集,制定报告轴性脊柱炎(axSpA)临床试验基线特征和结果的建议。方法:一个指导小组(SG)召集了一个工作组(WG),由13名ASAS成员组成,包括风湿病学家、方法学家、流行病学家和2名年轻的ASAS成员。关于报告axSpA试验基线特征和结果的建议分为三个步骤:(1)研究组从关键的axSpA临床试验中确定相关的基线特征,并就如何呈现与ASAS COS中仪器相关的结果制定建议。(2) SG提案在工作组会议上提出、讨论和修改。(3)在2024年度ASAS研讨会上,由ASAS成员对工作组提案进行讨论和投票。结果:定义了42个与所有axSpA临床试验相关的基线特征和8个与疾病改善药物试验相关的附加特征,包括如何报告这些特征的描述。此外,还就如何在基线和随访时间点报告20项试验结果提出了建议。最后,就如何报告asa额外认可但未列入COS的11项文书的结果提出了建议。asa成员批准了基线特征、COS结果和非COS结果的建议(分别有84%、85%和93%的成员赞成)。结论:这些asa认可的关于axSpA临床试验报告的建议提供了一种标准化的方法来报告基线特征和axSpA临床试验的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ASAS recommendations on reporting axial spondyloarthritis clinical trials.

Objectives: This study aims to develop recommendations on reporting baseline features and outcomes from axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) clinical trials based on the recently updated instrument set of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) core outcome set (COS).

Methods: A steering group (SG) convened a workgroup (WG), consisting of 13 ASAS members including rheumatologists, methodologists, epidemiologists, and 2 Young ASAS members. Recommendations on reporting axSpA trials baseline features and outcomes were developed in 3 steps: (1) the SG identified relevant baseline features from key axSpA clinical trials and formulated a proposal on how outcomes related to the instruments in the ASAS COS should be presented. (2) The SG proposal was presented, discussed, and modified in WG meetings. (3) WG proposal was discussed and voted on by ASAS members during the 2024 annual ASAS workshop.

Results: Forty-two baseline features relevant for all axSpA clinical trials and 8 additional features for disease-modifying drug trials were defined including descriptions on how to report them. Additionally, recommendations on how to report 20 trial outcomes at baseline and follow-up timepoints were put forward. Finally, recommendations on how to report 11 outcomes of instruments additionally endorsed by ASAS but not in the COS were formulated. Proposals for baseline features, COS outcomes, and outcomes not in COS were approved by ASAS members (with 84%, 85%, and 93% of members in favour, respectively).

Conclusions: These ASAS-endorsed recommendations on axSpA clinical trial reporting provide a standardised approach to reporting both baseline features as well as outcomes from axSpA clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信