胃底翻套式胃切除术与标准胃套式胃切除术治疗肥胖和胃食管反流病的疗效比较:一项随机试验

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Pierdiwasi Maimaitiyusupu, Aikebaier Aili, Maimaiti Yisireyili, Yiliang Li, Kelimu Abudureyimu, Xin Li
{"title":"胃底翻套式胃切除术与标准胃套式胃切除术治疗肥胖和胃食管反流病的疗效比较:一项随机试验","authors":"Pierdiwasi Maimaitiyusupu, Aikebaier Aili, Maimaiti Yisireyili, Yiliang Li, Kelimu Abudureyimu, Xin Li","doi":"10.1111/dom.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This randomised controlled trial compared the efficacy of modified laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication (LSGFD) versus standard laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in achieving weight loss and alleviating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with obesity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥27.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with comorbidities or ≥32.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) with mild-to-moderate GERD were randomised to LSGFD (n = 27) or LSG (n = 53). Assessments included weight, BMI, waist-hip ratio, percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), GERD Questionnaire scores, endoscopy, lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and DeMeester scores preoperatively and at 6-12 months postoperatively. Fundoplication type (180° Dor, 270° Toupet or 360° Nissen) was intraoperatively adjusted based on LES pressure. Statistical analyses used t-tests, analysis of variance and chi-square tests (SPSS v19.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the two groups in preoperative parameters. However, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, both groups showed significant reductions in body weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference and waist-hip ratio, along with a significant increase in the %EWL. The LSGFD group demonstrated superior outcomes in treating GERD and other obesity-related comorbidities, particularly notable improvements in reflux esophagitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSGFD provides equivalent weight loss to LSG but significantly superior control of GERD symptoms and resolution of reflux esophagitis. It offers enhanced management of obesity-related comorbidities without increasing surgical risk, supporting its use in obese patients with GERD.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication versus standard sleeve gastrectomy in obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomised trial.\",\"authors\":\"Pierdiwasi Maimaitiyusupu, Aikebaier Aili, Maimaiti Yisireyili, Yiliang Li, Kelimu Abudureyimu, Xin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dom.70094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This randomised controlled trial compared the efficacy of modified laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication (LSGFD) versus standard laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in achieving weight loss and alleviating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with obesity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥27.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with comorbidities or ≥32.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) with mild-to-moderate GERD were randomised to LSGFD (n = 27) or LSG (n = 53). Assessments included weight, BMI, waist-hip ratio, percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), GERD Questionnaire scores, endoscopy, lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and DeMeester scores preoperatively and at 6-12 months postoperatively. Fundoplication type (180° Dor, 270° Toupet or 360° Nissen) was intraoperatively adjusted based on LES pressure. Statistical analyses used t-tests, analysis of variance and chi-square tests (SPSS v19.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the two groups in preoperative parameters. However, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, both groups showed significant reductions in body weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference and waist-hip ratio, along with a significant increase in the %EWL. The LSGFD group demonstrated superior outcomes in treating GERD and other obesity-related comorbidities, particularly notable improvements in reflux esophagitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSGFD provides equivalent weight loss to LSG but significantly superior control of GERD symptoms and resolution of reflux esophagitis. It offers enhanced management of obesity-related comorbidities without increasing surgical risk, supporting its use in obese patients with GERD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70094\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项随机对照试验比较了改良腹腔镜袖式胃切除术合并胃底翻术(LSGFD)与标准腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(LSG)在肥胖患者减肥和缓解胃食管反流病(GERD)方面的疗效。材料和方法:80例肥胖(体重指数[BMI]≥27.5 kg/m2伴有合并症或≥32.5 kg/m2)合并轻度至中度胃食管反流患者随机分为LSGFD组(n = 27)或LSG组(n = 53)。评估包括体重、BMI、腰臀比、超重减重百分比(%EWL)、胃食管反流问卷评分、内镜检查、食管下括约肌(LES)压力和术前及术后6-12个月的DeMeester评分。术中根据LES压力调整底瓣类型(180°Dor, 270°Toupet或360°Nissen)。统计分析采用t检验、方差分析和卡方检验(SPSS v19.0)。结果:两组术前各项参数无明显差异。然而,在术后6个月和12个月,两组患者的体重、BMI、腰围、臀围和腰臀比均显著降低,EWL %显著增加。LSGFD组在治疗反流性食管炎和其他肥胖相关合并症方面表现出优越的结果,特别是在反流性食管炎方面的显著改善。结论:LSGFD的减肥效果与LSG相当,但在控制GERD症状和缓解反流性食管炎方面明显优于LSG。在不增加手术风险的情况下,它提供了对肥胖相关合并症的强化管理,支持其在伴有胃食管反流的肥胖患者中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication versus standard sleeve gastrectomy in obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomised trial.

Aims: This randomised controlled trial compared the efficacy of modified laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication (LSGFD) versus standard laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in achieving weight loss and alleviating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with obesity.

Materials and methods: Eighty patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥27.5 kg/m2 with comorbidities or ≥32.5 kg/m2) with mild-to-moderate GERD were randomised to LSGFD (n = 27) or LSG (n = 53). Assessments included weight, BMI, waist-hip ratio, percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), GERD Questionnaire scores, endoscopy, lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and DeMeester scores preoperatively and at 6-12 months postoperatively. Fundoplication type (180° Dor, 270° Toupet or 360° Nissen) was intraoperatively adjusted based on LES pressure. Statistical analyses used t-tests, analysis of variance and chi-square tests (SPSS v19.0).

Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups in preoperative parameters. However, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, both groups showed significant reductions in body weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference and waist-hip ratio, along with a significant increase in the %EWL. The LSGFD group demonstrated superior outcomes in treating GERD and other obesity-related comorbidities, particularly notable improvements in reflux esophagitis.

Conclusions: LSGFD provides equivalent weight loss to LSG but significantly superior control of GERD symptoms and resolution of reflux esophagitis. It offers enhanced management of obesity-related comorbidities without increasing surgical risk, supporting its use in obese patients with GERD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信