非甾体抗炎药与胃肠道出血的风险:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Abdelrahman G Tawfik, Ainhoa Gomez-Lumbreras, Guilherme Del Fiol, Kensaku Kawamoto, Katy E Trinkley, Thomas Reese, Aubrey Jones, Daniel C Malone
{"title":"非甾体抗炎药与胃肠道出血的风险:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Abdelrahman G Tawfik, Ainhoa Gomez-Lumbreras, Guilherme Del Fiol, Kensaku Kawamoto, Katy E Trinkley, Thomas Reese, Aubrey Jones, Daniel C Malone","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for pain and inflammation but are associated with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. While this risk is well established, most studies evaluate NSAIDs as a homogenous class, limiting clinical decision-making based on individual agent safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the risk of GI bleeding associated with individual NSAIDs. We searched PubMed from inception through January 2025 using MeSH and free-text terms for \"gastrointestinal bleeding\" and nine commonly used NSAIDs. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) for GI bleeding, with hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) treated as approximations of ORs due to the rare event nature of GI bleeding. Of 6,711 records screened, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Substantial heterogeneity in study design, populations, and outcome ascertainment was observed. Celecoxib was associated with the lowest risk of GI bleeding (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.84-1.61). Among non-selective NSAIDs, ibuprofen had the lowest significant risk (OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.71-3.03), while ketorolac showed the highest risk (OR 20.67, 95% CI: 14.56-29.34). Other agents, such as piroxicam and meloxicam, also demonstrated significantly elevated risks. The risk of GI bleeding varies widely among individual NSAIDs. Celecoxib appears to have the lowest GI risk, though cardiovascular safety must also be considered. These findings highlight the need for personalized NSAID selection and suggest that NSAIDs should not be treated as a uniform class when assessing bleeding risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdelrahman G Tawfik, Ainhoa Gomez-Lumbreras, Guilherme Del Fiol, Kensaku Kawamoto, Katy E Trinkley, Thomas Reese, Aubrey Jones, Daniel C Malone\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpt.70054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for pain and inflammation but are associated with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. While this risk is well established, most studies evaluate NSAIDs as a homogenous class, limiting clinical decision-making based on individual agent safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the risk of GI bleeding associated with individual NSAIDs. We searched PubMed from inception through January 2025 using MeSH and free-text terms for \\\"gastrointestinal bleeding\\\" and nine commonly used NSAIDs. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) for GI bleeding, with hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) treated as approximations of ORs due to the rare event nature of GI bleeding. Of 6,711 records screened, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Substantial heterogeneity in study design, populations, and outcome ascertainment was observed. Celecoxib was associated with the lowest risk of GI bleeding (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.84-1.61). Among non-selective NSAIDs, ibuprofen had the lowest significant risk (OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.71-3.03), while ketorolac showed the highest risk (OR 20.67, 95% CI: 14.56-29.34). Other agents, such as piroxicam and meloxicam, also demonstrated significantly elevated risks. The risk of GI bleeding varies widely among individual NSAIDs. Celecoxib appears to have the lowest GI risk, though cardiovascular safety must also be considered. These findings highlight the need for personalized NSAID selection and suggest that NSAIDs should not be treated as a uniform class when assessing bleeding risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70054\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)广泛用于治疗疼痛和炎症,但与胃肠道(GI)出血有关。虽然这种风险是确定的,但大多数研究将非甾体抗炎药评价为同质类,限制了基于单个药物安全性的临床决策。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在量化与个体非甾体抗炎药相关的胃肠道出血风险。我们使用MeSH和自由文本检索PubMed从成立到2025年1月的“胃肠道出血”和9种常用的非甾体抗炎药。进行随机效应荟萃分析以估计胃肠道出血的合并优势比(ORs),由于胃肠道出血的罕见事件性质,风险比(hr)和相对风险(rr)作为ORs的近似值。在筛选的6711份记录中,有25项研究符合纳入标准。在研究设计、人群和结果确定方面观察到大量的异质性。塞来昔布与胃肠道出血风险最低相关(OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.84-1.61)。在非选择性非甾体抗炎药中,布洛芬的显著风险最低(OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.71-3.03),而酮洛酸的显著风险最高(OR 20.67, 95% CI: 14.56-29.34)。其他药物,如吡罗西康和美洛昔康,也显示出显著增加的风险。不同的非甾体抗炎药导致胃肠道出血的风险差异很大。塞来昔布似乎具有最低的胃肠道风险,尽管心血管安全性也必须考虑在内。这些发现强调了个性化非甾体抗炎药选择的必要性,并建议在评估出血风险时不应将非甾体抗炎药作为统一的类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for pain and inflammation but are associated with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. While this risk is well established, most studies evaluate NSAIDs as a homogenous class, limiting clinical decision-making based on individual agent safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the risk of GI bleeding associated with individual NSAIDs. We searched PubMed from inception through January 2025 using MeSH and free-text terms for "gastrointestinal bleeding" and nine commonly used NSAIDs. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) for GI bleeding, with hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) treated as approximations of ORs due to the rare event nature of GI bleeding. Of 6,711 records screened, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Substantial heterogeneity in study design, populations, and outcome ascertainment was observed. Celecoxib was associated with the lowest risk of GI bleeding (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.84-1.61). Among non-selective NSAIDs, ibuprofen had the lowest significant risk (OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.71-3.03), while ketorolac showed the highest risk (OR 20.67, 95% CI: 14.56-29.34). Other agents, such as piroxicam and meloxicam, also demonstrated significantly elevated risks. The risk of GI bleeding varies widely among individual NSAIDs. Celecoxib appears to have the lowest GI risk, though cardiovascular safety must also be considered. These findings highlight the need for personalized NSAID selection and suggest that NSAIDs should not be treated as a uniform class when assessing bleeding risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信