{"title":"基于意义生成现象的规划:雄心科学教学专业视野的发展","authors":"Arzu Tanis Ozcelik, Scott McDonald","doi":"10.1002/sce.21967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the era of the Framework for K-12 Science Education and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), research on preparing preservice science teachers (PSTs) for NGSS-aligned teaching practices is important. In this study, we explored PSTs' sense-making around planning for Ambitious Science Teaching (AST) during their discussions of teaching in a secondary science teaching methods course. Grounded in sociocultural and situated views of learning, we examine how approximation and decomposition of AST practices support PSTs in making sense of lesson planning in developing meaningful learning and teaching environments. We conducted this case study in a secondary science teaching methods course within a teacher education program at a large mid-Atlantic university. The participants included six PSTs and their instructor. We used video recordings of the course and the lesson plans PSTs developed as data sources. Using both inductive and deductive coding, we applied discourse analysis based on interactional sociolinguistics theory and the framework of professional vision to analyze the data. Findings indicate PSTs engaged in sense-making around two key areas of AST planning: defining phenomena and constructing explanations. PSTs made sense of the characteristics of the chosen phenomenon, including its explicitness and its alignment with the storyline of the unit, as well as what counted as an explanation, focusing on two aspects of scientific explanations: gapless explanations and levels of explanations. Based on these findings, we provided implications for teacher educators designing methods courses that focus on ambitious science instruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"109 5","pages":"1384-1405"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sce.21967","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sense-Making Phenomena-Based Planning: Development of Professional Vision on Ambitious Science Teaching\",\"authors\":\"Arzu Tanis Ozcelik, Scott McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sce.21967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the era of the Framework for K-12 Science Education and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), research on preparing preservice science teachers (PSTs) for NGSS-aligned teaching practices is important. In this study, we explored PSTs' sense-making around planning for Ambitious Science Teaching (AST) during their discussions of teaching in a secondary science teaching methods course. Grounded in sociocultural and situated views of learning, we examine how approximation and decomposition of AST practices support PSTs in making sense of lesson planning in developing meaningful learning and teaching environments. We conducted this case study in a secondary science teaching methods course within a teacher education program at a large mid-Atlantic university. The participants included six PSTs and their instructor. We used video recordings of the course and the lesson plans PSTs developed as data sources. Using both inductive and deductive coding, we applied discourse analysis based on interactional sociolinguistics theory and the framework of professional vision to analyze the data. Findings indicate PSTs engaged in sense-making around two key areas of AST planning: defining phenomena and constructing explanations. PSTs made sense of the characteristics of the chosen phenomenon, including its explicitness and its alignment with the storyline of the unit, as well as what counted as an explanation, focusing on two aspects of scientific explanations: gapless explanations and levels of explanations. Based on these findings, we provided implications for teacher educators designing methods courses that focus on ambitious science instruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & Education\",\"volume\":\"109 5\",\"pages\":\"1384-1405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sce.21967\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21967\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21967","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sense-Making Phenomena-Based Planning: Development of Professional Vision on Ambitious Science Teaching
In the era of the Framework for K-12 Science Education and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), research on preparing preservice science teachers (PSTs) for NGSS-aligned teaching practices is important. In this study, we explored PSTs' sense-making around planning for Ambitious Science Teaching (AST) during their discussions of teaching in a secondary science teaching methods course. Grounded in sociocultural and situated views of learning, we examine how approximation and decomposition of AST practices support PSTs in making sense of lesson planning in developing meaningful learning and teaching environments. We conducted this case study in a secondary science teaching methods course within a teacher education program at a large mid-Atlantic university. The participants included six PSTs and their instructor. We used video recordings of the course and the lesson plans PSTs developed as data sources. Using both inductive and deductive coding, we applied discourse analysis based on interactional sociolinguistics theory and the framework of professional vision to analyze the data. Findings indicate PSTs engaged in sense-making around two key areas of AST planning: defining phenomena and constructing explanations. PSTs made sense of the characteristics of the chosen phenomenon, including its explicitness and its alignment with the storyline of the unit, as well as what counted as an explanation, focusing on two aspects of scientific explanations: gapless explanations and levels of explanations. Based on these findings, we provided implications for teacher educators designing methods courses that focus on ambitious science instruction.
期刊介绍:
Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]