{"title":"全膝关节置换术后膝关节屈曲度下降的预测因素","authors":"Tatsuya Kubo, Tsuneari Takahashi, Katsushi Takeshita","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with deterioration in knee flexion range of motion (ROM) following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 129 consecutive patients who underwent CR-TKA and completed a 2-year follow-up were included. A decrease of ≥9° in flexion ROM was considered clinically significant. Patients were classified into two groups based on the change in flexion ROM at 2 years post-operatively: Group D (≥9° decrease; <i>n</i> = 44) and Group C (<9° decrease; <i>n</i> = 85). Demographic data were compared using Student's <i>t</i> test or Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with ROM deterioration. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine cut-off values for the identified factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Preoperative flexion ROM was significantly higher in Group D than in Group C (128.6 ± 9.5° vs. 115.5 ± 12.3°, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that greater preoperative flexion ROM (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.27; <i>p</i> < 0.001), a larger distal medial femoral resection (DMFR) (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.14–3.43; <i>p</i> = 0.015) and lower anterior-posterior translation at 30° of flexion 1 year post-operatively (1y30AP) (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57–0.93; <i>p</i> = 0.012) were independently associated with a ≥9° reduction in flexion ROM. ROC analysis identified cut-off values of >130.0° for preoperative flexion ROM (AUC: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72–0.88), >7.5 mm for DMFR (AUC: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50–0.71) and <5.1 mm for 1y30AP (AUC: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51–0.72).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Preoperative flexion ROM, DMFR and 1y30AP were associated with worse flexion ROM at 2 years following CR-TKA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70419","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of post-operative decline in knee flexion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Tatsuya Kubo, Tsuneari Takahashi, Katsushi Takeshita\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with deterioration in knee flexion range of motion (ROM) following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 129 consecutive patients who underwent CR-TKA and completed a 2-year follow-up were included. A decrease of ≥9° in flexion ROM was considered clinically significant. Patients were classified into two groups based on the change in flexion ROM at 2 years post-operatively: Group D (≥9° decrease; <i>n</i> = 44) and Group C (<9° decrease; <i>n</i> = 85). Demographic data were compared using Student's <i>t</i> test or Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with ROM deterioration. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine cut-off values for the identified factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Preoperative flexion ROM was significantly higher in Group D than in Group C (128.6 ± 9.5° vs. 115.5 ± 12.3°, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that greater preoperative flexion ROM (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.27; <i>p</i> < 0.001), a larger distal medial femoral resection (DMFR) (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.14–3.43; <i>p</i> = 0.015) and lower anterior-posterior translation at 30° of flexion 1 year post-operatively (1y30AP) (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57–0.93; <i>p</i> = 0.012) were independently associated with a ≥9° reduction in flexion ROM. ROC analysis identified cut-off values of >130.0° for preoperative flexion ROM (AUC: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72–0.88), >7.5 mm for DMFR (AUC: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50–0.71) and <5.1 mm for 1y30AP (AUC: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51–0.72).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Preoperative flexion ROM, DMFR and 1y30AP were associated with worse flexion ROM at 2 years following CR-TKA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70419\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictors of post-operative decline in knee flexion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty
Purpose
This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with deterioration in knee flexion range of motion (ROM) following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA).
Methods
A total of 129 consecutive patients who underwent CR-TKA and completed a 2-year follow-up were included. A decrease of ≥9° in flexion ROM was considered clinically significant. Patients were classified into two groups based on the change in flexion ROM at 2 years post-operatively: Group D (≥9° decrease; n = 44) and Group C (<9° decrease; n = 85). Demographic data were compared using Student's t test or Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with ROM deterioration. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine cut-off values for the identified factors.
Results
Demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Preoperative flexion ROM was significantly higher in Group D than in Group C (128.6 ± 9.5° vs. 115.5 ± 12.3°, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that greater preoperative flexion ROM (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.27; p < 0.001), a larger distal medial femoral resection (DMFR) (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.14–3.43; p = 0.015) and lower anterior-posterior translation at 30° of flexion 1 year post-operatively (1y30AP) (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57–0.93; p = 0.012) were independently associated with a ≥9° reduction in flexion ROM. ROC analysis identified cut-off values of >130.0° for preoperative flexion ROM (AUC: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72–0.88), >7.5 mm for DMFR (AUC: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50–0.71) and <5.1 mm for 1y30AP (AUC: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51–0.72).
Conclusions
Preoperative flexion ROM, DMFR and 1y30AP were associated with worse flexion ROM at 2 years following CR-TKA.