全膝关节置换术后膝关节屈曲度下降的预测因素

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Tatsuya Kubo, Tsuneari Takahashi, Katsushi Takeshita
{"title":"全膝关节置换术后膝关节屈曲度下降的预测因素","authors":"Tatsuya Kubo,&nbsp;Tsuneari Takahashi,&nbsp;Katsushi Takeshita","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with deterioration in knee flexion range of motion (ROM) following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 129 consecutive patients who underwent CR-TKA and completed a 2-year follow-up were included. A decrease of ≥9° in flexion ROM was considered clinically significant. Patients were classified into two groups based on the change in flexion ROM at 2 years post-operatively: Group D (≥9° decrease; <i>n</i> = 44) and Group C (&lt;9° decrease; <i>n</i> = 85). Demographic data were compared using Student's <i>t</i> test or Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with ROM deterioration. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine cut-off values for the identified factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Preoperative flexion ROM was significantly higher in Group D than in Group C (128.6 ± 9.5° vs. 115.5 ± 12.3°, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that greater preoperative flexion ROM (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.27; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), a larger distal medial femoral resection (DMFR) (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.14–3.43; <i>p</i> = 0.015) and lower anterior-posterior translation at 30° of flexion 1 year post-operatively (1y30AP) (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57–0.93; <i>p</i> = 0.012) were independently associated with a ≥9° reduction in flexion ROM. ROC analysis identified cut-off values of &gt;130.0° for preoperative flexion ROM (AUC: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72–0.88), &gt;7.5 mm for DMFR (AUC: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50–0.71) and &lt;5.1 mm for 1y30AP (AUC: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51–0.72).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Preoperative flexion ROM, DMFR and 1y30AP were associated with worse flexion ROM at 2 years following CR-TKA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70419","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of post-operative decline in knee flexion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Tatsuya Kubo,&nbsp;Tsuneari Takahashi,&nbsp;Katsushi Takeshita\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with deterioration in knee flexion range of motion (ROM) following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 129 consecutive patients who underwent CR-TKA and completed a 2-year follow-up were included. A decrease of ≥9° in flexion ROM was considered clinically significant. Patients were classified into two groups based on the change in flexion ROM at 2 years post-operatively: Group D (≥9° decrease; <i>n</i> = 44) and Group C (&lt;9° decrease; <i>n</i> = 85). Demographic data were compared using Student's <i>t</i> test or Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with ROM deterioration. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine cut-off values for the identified factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Preoperative flexion ROM was significantly higher in Group D than in Group C (128.6 ± 9.5° vs. 115.5 ± 12.3°, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that greater preoperative flexion ROM (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.27; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), a larger distal medial femoral resection (DMFR) (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.14–3.43; <i>p</i> = 0.015) and lower anterior-posterior translation at 30° of flexion 1 year post-operatively (1y30AP) (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57–0.93; <i>p</i> = 0.012) were independently associated with a ≥9° reduction in flexion ROM. ROC analysis identified cut-off values of &gt;130.0° for preoperative flexion ROM (AUC: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72–0.88), &gt;7.5 mm for DMFR (AUC: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50–0.71) and &lt;5.1 mm for 1y30AP (AUC: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51–0.72).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Preoperative flexion ROM, DMFR and 1y30AP were associated with worse flexion ROM at 2 years following CR-TKA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70419\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定与保留十字架全膝关节置换术(CR-TKA)后膝关节屈曲活动范围(ROM)恶化相关的危险因素。方法对129例连续接受CR-TKA治疗并完成2年随访的患者进行分析。屈曲ROM降低≥9°被认为具有临床意义。根据术后2年屈曲度ROM的变化将患者分为两组:D组(≥9°减小,n = 44)和C组(≥9°减小,n = 85)。人口统计数据的比较采用学生t检验或Fisher精确检验。进行逻辑回归分析以确定与ROM恶化相关的因素。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,确定确定因素的临界值。结果两组患者人口学特征具有可比性。D组术前屈曲度明显高于C组(128.6±9.5°比115.5±12.3°,p < 0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示术前较大的屈曲ROM(优势比[OR], 1.18; 95%可信区间[CI], 1.10-1.27; p < 0.001),股骨内侧远端切除(DMFR)较大(OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.14-3.43; p = 0.015),术后1年屈曲30°前后移位较低(1y30AP) (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.93;p = 0.012)与屈曲ROM减少≥9°独立相关。ROC分析确定术前屈曲ROM的临界值为>;130.0°(AUC: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72-0.88), DMFR的临界值为>;7.5 mm (AUC: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50-0.71), 1y30AP的临界值为>; 5.1 mm (AUC: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51-0.72)。结论术前屈曲性ROM、DMFR和1y30AP与CR-TKA术后2年屈曲性ROM恶化相关。证据等级III级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predictors of post-operative decline in knee flexion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

Predictors of post-operative decline in knee flexion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

Predictors of post-operative decline in knee flexion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

Predictors of post-operative decline in knee flexion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

Predictors of post-operative decline in knee flexion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with deterioration in knee flexion range of motion (ROM) following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA).

Methods

A total of 129 consecutive patients who underwent CR-TKA and completed a 2-year follow-up were included. A decrease of ≥9° in flexion ROM was considered clinically significant. Patients were classified into two groups based on the change in flexion ROM at 2 years post-operatively: Group D (≥9° decrease; n = 44) and Group C (<9° decrease; n = 85). Demographic data were compared using Student's t test or Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with ROM deterioration. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine cut-off values for the identified factors.

Results

Demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Preoperative flexion ROM was significantly higher in Group D than in Group C (128.6 ± 9.5° vs. 115.5 ± 12.3°, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that greater preoperative flexion ROM (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.27; p < 0.001), a larger distal medial femoral resection (DMFR) (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.14–3.43; p = 0.015) and lower anterior-posterior translation at 30° of flexion 1 year post-operatively (1y30AP) (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57–0.93; p = 0.012) were independently associated with a ≥9° reduction in flexion ROM. ROC analysis identified cut-off values of >130.0° for preoperative flexion ROM (AUC: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72–0.88), >7.5 mm for DMFR (AUC: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50–0.71) and <5.1 mm for 1y30AP (AUC: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51–0.72).

Conclusions

Preoperative flexion ROM, DMFR and 1y30AP were associated with worse flexion ROM at 2 years following CR-TKA.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信