我们应该在手术前例行进行胸部x光检查吗?使用研究和评估指南评估-建议卓越(AGREE-REX)工具对临床建议进行系统范围审查

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ting-Ju Wu, Kee-Hsin Chen, Yi-No Kang, Khanh Dinh Hoang, Hsin-Chih Fang, Chiehfeng Chen
{"title":"我们应该在手术前例行进行胸部x光检查吗?使用研究和评估指南评估-建议卓越(AGREE-REX)工具对临床建议进行系统范围审查","authors":"Ting-Ju Wu,&nbsp;Kee-Hsin Chen,&nbsp;Yi-No Kang,&nbsp;Khanh Dinh Hoang,&nbsp;Hsin-Chih Fang,&nbsp;Chiehfeng Chen","doi":"10.1111/jep.70265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Chest radiography is often performed preoperatively as a common diagnostic tool. However, chest radiography carries the risk of radiation exposure. Given the uncertainty surrounding the utility of preoperative chest radiographs, physicians require systematically developed recommendations. This systematic review assesses the quality and consistency of guideline recommendations for the timing and indications of preoperative chest radiography to make appropriate decisions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The guideline recommendations on the management of the preoperative chest radiography, August 2024, were retrieved. All the reviewed recommendations were in English. Four reviewers independently assessed the quality of recommendations by using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) instrument, which contained three main domains (clinical applicability, values and preferences, and implementability), and their reported evidence was evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ten eligible recommendations were included. Six and four of the recommendations were of high and moderate quality according to AGREE-REX instrument, respectively. Overall, these guideline statements demonstrated significantly higher quality in the implementability domain (median 5.62, IQR 5.03 to 5.97), followed by the domain of value and preference (median 5.34, IQR 4.45 to 5.48) and the clinical applicability domain (median 4.96, IQR 4.27 to 5.15). Most recommendations on the preoperative chest radiograph were relatively consistent. The overall Krippendorff′s alpha value of 0.824 indicates generally satisfactory agreement and reliable ratings. Although none of the 10 recommendations advocate for routine preoperative chest radiographs, they indicate specific clinical circumstances and patient populations in which such testing may be warranted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Routine chest radiography before surgery is generally not recommended, except in specific circumstances, as follows: (1) age &gt; 70 years, (2) cardiac or thoracic clinical symptoms or a medical history, (3) surgery involving the chest, (4) ASA levels III to VI, and (5) work environments that may expose individuals to harmful particles. However, the final decision regarding preoperative chest radiographs should remain flexible, should be based on individual patient characteristics, the physician′s expertise, and consultation with other health-care professionals.</p>\n \n <p><b>Clinical Trial Registration.</b> Name of the registry: PROSPERO Unique Identifying number or registration ID: CRD42024605618 Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked): https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=605618.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should We Routinely Take Chest X-Rays Before Surgery? A Systematic Scoping Review of Clinical Recommendations Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) Instrument\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Ju Wu,&nbsp;Kee-Hsin Chen,&nbsp;Yi-No Kang,&nbsp;Khanh Dinh Hoang,&nbsp;Hsin-Chih Fang,&nbsp;Chiehfeng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Chest radiography is often performed preoperatively as a common diagnostic tool. However, chest radiography carries the risk of radiation exposure. Given the uncertainty surrounding the utility of preoperative chest radiographs, physicians require systematically developed recommendations. This systematic review assesses the quality and consistency of guideline recommendations for the timing and indications of preoperative chest radiography to make appropriate decisions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The guideline recommendations on the management of the preoperative chest radiography, August 2024, were retrieved. All the reviewed recommendations were in English. Four reviewers independently assessed the quality of recommendations by using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) instrument, which contained three main domains (clinical applicability, values and preferences, and implementability), and their reported evidence was evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ten eligible recommendations were included. Six and four of the recommendations were of high and moderate quality according to AGREE-REX instrument, respectively. Overall, these guideline statements demonstrated significantly higher quality in the implementability domain (median 5.62, IQR 5.03 to 5.97), followed by the domain of value and preference (median 5.34, IQR 4.45 to 5.48) and the clinical applicability domain (median 4.96, IQR 4.27 to 5.15). Most recommendations on the preoperative chest radiograph were relatively consistent. The overall Krippendorff′s alpha value of 0.824 indicates generally satisfactory agreement and reliable ratings. Although none of the 10 recommendations advocate for routine preoperative chest radiographs, they indicate specific clinical circumstances and patient populations in which such testing may be warranted.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Routine chest radiography before surgery is generally not recommended, except in specific circumstances, as follows: (1) age &gt; 70 years, (2) cardiac or thoracic clinical symptoms or a medical history, (3) surgery involving the chest, (4) ASA levels III to VI, and (5) work environments that may expose individuals to harmful particles. However, the final decision regarding preoperative chest radiographs should remain flexible, should be based on individual patient characteristics, the physician′s expertise, and consultation with other health-care professionals.</p>\\n \\n <p><b>Clinical Trial Registration.</b> Name of the registry: PROSPERO Unique Identifying number or registration ID: CRD42024605618 Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked): https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=605618.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70265\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景胸片通常作为一种常见的诊断工具在术前进行。然而,胸部x线摄影有辐射暴露的风险。鉴于术前胸片应用的不确定性,医生需要系统地提出建议。本系统综述评估了术前胸部x线摄影时机和适应症的指南建议的质量和一致性,以做出适当的决定。方法检索2024年8月《术前胸片处理指南》。所有审查过的建议都是英文的。四名审稿人通过使用研究和评估指南评估-建议卓越性(AGREE-REX)工具独立评估建议的质量,该工具包含三个主要领域(临床适用性、价值和偏好以及可实施性),并对其报告的证据进行评估。结果纳入10条符合条件的推荐。根据AGREE-REX仪器,其中6项和4项建议分别为高质量和中等质量。总体而言,这些指南声明在可实施性领域(中位数为5.62,IQR为5.03至5.97)表现出更高的质量,其次是价值和偏好领域(中位数为5.34,IQR为4.45至5.48)和临床适用性领域(中位数为4.96,IQR为4.27至5.15)。大多数术前胸片的建议相对一致。总体Krippendorff的alpha值为0.824,表明一致性总体满意,评级可靠。虽然10条建议中没有一条提倡术前常规胸片检查,但它们指出了特定的临床情况和患者群体可能需要进行此类检查。结论一般不建议术前常规胸片检查,除非有以下特殊情况:(1)年龄70岁;(2)心脏或胸部临床症状或病史;(3)手术涉及胸部;(4)ASA等级为III至VI级;(5)工作环境可能暴露于有害颗粒。然而,关于术前胸片的最终决定应保持灵活性,应基于个体患者的特点、医生的专业知识以及与其他卫生保健专业人员的咨询。临床试验注册。注册中心名称:普洛斯彼罗唯一识别号码或注册ID: CRD42024605618到您特定注册的超链接(必须公开访问并将被检查):https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=605618。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should We Routinely Take Chest X-Rays Before Surgery? A Systematic Scoping Review of Clinical Recommendations Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) Instrument

Background

Chest radiography is often performed preoperatively as a common diagnostic tool. However, chest radiography carries the risk of radiation exposure. Given the uncertainty surrounding the utility of preoperative chest radiographs, physicians require systematically developed recommendations. This systematic review assesses the quality and consistency of guideline recommendations for the timing and indications of preoperative chest radiography to make appropriate decisions.

Methods

The guideline recommendations on the management of the preoperative chest radiography, August 2024, were retrieved. All the reviewed recommendations were in English. Four reviewers independently assessed the quality of recommendations by using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) instrument, which contained three main domains (clinical applicability, values and preferences, and implementability), and their reported evidence was evaluated.

Results

Ten eligible recommendations were included. Six and four of the recommendations were of high and moderate quality according to AGREE-REX instrument, respectively. Overall, these guideline statements demonstrated significantly higher quality in the implementability domain (median 5.62, IQR 5.03 to 5.97), followed by the domain of value and preference (median 5.34, IQR 4.45 to 5.48) and the clinical applicability domain (median 4.96, IQR 4.27 to 5.15). Most recommendations on the preoperative chest radiograph were relatively consistent. The overall Krippendorff′s alpha value of 0.824 indicates generally satisfactory agreement and reliable ratings. Although none of the 10 recommendations advocate for routine preoperative chest radiographs, they indicate specific clinical circumstances and patient populations in which such testing may be warranted.

Conclusions

Routine chest radiography before surgery is generally not recommended, except in specific circumstances, as follows: (1) age > 70 years, (2) cardiac or thoracic clinical symptoms or a medical history, (3) surgery involving the chest, (4) ASA levels III to VI, and (5) work environments that may expose individuals to harmful particles. However, the final decision regarding preoperative chest radiographs should remain flexible, should be based on individual patient characteristics, the physician′s expertise, and consultation with other health-care professionals.

Clinical Trial Registration. Name of the registry: PROSPERO Unique Identifying number or registration ID: CRD42024605618 Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked): https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=605618.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信