{"title":"评估下腔静脉动力学作为机器人辅助非体外泵冠状动脉搭桥手术术中液体管理的备用策略","authors":"Han-Yu Lin, Shu-Yu Wu, I-Shiang Tzeng, Chun-Yu Chang, Nien-Hsun Wu, Ping-Cheng Shih","doi":"10.1155/jocs/4373211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The inferior vena cava distensibility index (dIVC) has been proposed as an alternative dynamic parameter for predicting fluid responsiveness (FR) in mechanically ventilated patients. This study explored the correlation between dIVC and commonly used FR indicators in patients undergoing robotic-assisted off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Thirty-two patients were prospectively enrolled, and hemodynamic parameters, including stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and the right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI), were recorded at four intraoperative time points. These time points were selected to represent distinct physiological phases during surgery: two-lung ventilation (TLV), one-lung ventilation (OLV), capnothorax, and mini-thoracotomy. dIVC showed a weak but significant positive correlation with SVV (<i>r</i> = 0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and PPV (<i>r</i> = 0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas no significant correlation was observed with static preload indicators (CVP, PCWP, and RVEDVI). Given that transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is routinely employed in OPCAB surgery, dIVC measured via TEE may serve as a valuable adjunct for FR assessment when the SVV and PPV are unreliable, such as in patients with irregular heartbeats. However, using dIVC to predict intraoperative FR should be approached with caution, considering factors such as ventilator settings, inspiratory efforts, cardiopulmonary conditions, and intraabdominal hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jocs/4373211","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Inferior Vena Cava Dynamics as a Backup Strategy for Intraoperative Fluid Management in Robotic-Assisted Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Han-Yu Lin, Shu-Yu Wu, I-Shiang Tzeng, Chun-Yu Chang, Nien-Hsun Wu, Ping-Cheng Shih\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/jocs/4373211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The inferior vena cava distensibility index (dIVC) has been proposed as an alternative dynamic parameter for predicting fluid responsiveness (FR) in mechanically ventilated patients. This study explored the correlation between dIVC and commonly used FR indicators in patients undergoing robotic-assisted off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Thirty-two patients were prospectively enrolled, and hemodynamic parameters, including stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and the right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI), were recorded at four intraoperative time points. These time points were selected to represent distinct physiological phases during surgery: two-lung ventilation (TLV), one-lung ventilation (OLV), capnothorax, and mini-thoracotomy. dIVC showed a weak but significant positive correlation with SVV (<i>r</i> = 0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and PPV (<i>r</i> = 0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas no significant correlation was observed with static preload indicators (CVP, PCWP, and RVEDVI). Given that transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is routinely employed in OPCAB surgery, dIVC measured via TEE may serve as a valuable adjunct for FR assessment when the SVV and PPV are unreliable, such as in patients with irregular heartbeats. However, using dIVC to predict intraoperative FR should be approached with caution, considering factors such as ventilator settings, inspiratory efforts, cardiopulmonary conditions, and intraabdominal hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Surgery\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jocs/4373211\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jocs/4373211\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jocs/4373211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
下腔静脉扩张指数(dIVC)已被提出作为预测机械通气患者液体反应性(FR)的备选动态参数。本研究探讨了机器人辅助非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)患者dIVC与常用FR指标的相关性。前瞻性纳入32例患者,记录术中4个时间点的血流动力学参数,包括卒中容积变化(SVV)、脉压变化(PPV)、中心静脉压(CVP)、肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)和右心室舒张末期容积指数(RVEDVI)。这些时间点被选择来代表手术过程中不同的生理阶段:双肺通气(TLV)、单肺通气(OLV)、capno胸和小开胸。dIVC与SVV (r = 0.28, p < 0.001)和PPV (r = 0.28, p < 0.001)呈微弱但显著的正相关,而与静态预负荷指标(CVP、PCWP和RVEDVI)无显著相关性。考虑到经食管超声心动图(TEE)在OPCAB手术中常规使用,当SVV和PPV不可靠时,例如在心律失常的患者中,TEE测量的dIVC可作为评估FR的有价值的辅助手段。然而,使用dIVC预测术中FR应谨慎,考虑呼吸机设置、吸气力度、心肺状况和腹内高压等因素。
Assessment of Inferior Vena Cava Dynamics as a Backup Strategy for Intraoperative Fluid Management in Robotic-Assisted Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery
The inferior vena cava distensibility index (dIVC) has been proposed as an alternative dynamic parameter for predicting fluid responsiveness (FR) in mechanically ventilated patients. This study explored the correlation between dIVC and commonly used FR indicators in patients undergoing robotic-assisted off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Thirty-two patients were prospectively enrolled, and hemodynamic parameters, including stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and the right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI), were recorded at four intraoperative time points. These time points were selected to represent distinct physiological phases during surgery: two-lung ventilation (TLV), one-lung ventilation (OLV), capnothorax, and mini-thoracotomy. dIVC showed a weak but significant positive correlation with SVV (r = 0.28, p < 0.001) and PPV (r = 0.28, p < 0.001), whereas no significant correlation was observed with static preload indicators (CVP, PCWP, and RVEDVI). Given that transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is routinely employed in OPCAB surgery, dIVC measured via TEE may serve as a valuable adjunct for FR assessment when the SVV and PPV are unreliable, such as in patients with irregular heartbeats. However, using dIVC to predict intraoperative FR should be approached with caution, considering factors such as ventilator settings, inspiratory efforts, cardiopulmonary conditions, and intraabdominal hypertension.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiac Surgery (JCS) is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to contemporary surgical treatment of cardiac disease. Renown for its detailed "how to" methods, JCS''s well-illustrated, concise technical articles, critical reviews and commentaries are highly valued by dedicated readers worldwide.
With Editor-in-Chief Harold Lazar, MD and an internationally prominent editorial board, JCS continues its 20-year history as an important professional resource. Editorial coverage includes biologic support, mechanical cardiac assist and/or replacement and surgical techniques, and features current material on topics such as OPCAB surgery, stented and stentless valves, endovascular stent placement, atrial fibrillation, transplantation, percutaneous valve repair/replacement, left ventricular restoration surgery, immunobiology, and bridges to transplant and recovery.
In addition, special sections (Images in Cardiac Surgery, Cardiac Regeneration) and historical reviews stimulate reader interest. The journal also routinely publishes proceedings of important international symposia in a timely manner.