通用人工智能及其对公共卫生的威胁

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Richard C. Armitage
{"title":"通用人工智能及其对公共卫生的威胁","authors":"Richard C. Armitage","doi":"10.1111/jep.70269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied across healthcare and public health, with evidence of benefits including enhanced diagnostics, predictive modelling, operational efficiency, medical education, and disease surveillance.However, potential harms – such as algorithmic bias, unsafe recommendations, misinformation, privacy risks, and sycophantic reinforcement – pose challenges to safe implementation.Far less attention has been directed to the public health threats posed by artificial general intelligence (AGI), a hypothetical form of AI with human-level or greater cognitive capacities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This article explores the benefits and harms of current AI systems, introduces AGI and its distinguishing features, and examines the threats AGI could pose to public health and humanity's survival.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Unlike ‘narrow’ AI, AGI could autonomously learn, generalise across domains, and self-improve, potentially achieving superintelligence with unpredictable behaviours.AGI threatens public health through two broad categories: (1) misuse, where adversaries deploy AGI for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or to develop chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons; and (2) misalignment, where poorly aligned AGI pursues goals in harmful ways, leading to loss of human control, erosion of autonomy, and potentially existential risk.The population-level consequences include widespread unemployment, reduced trust in health systems, catastrophic biological threats, and risks to human survival.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Healthcare and public health professionals have a critical role in framing AGI risks as health threats, building coalitions akin to historic movements against nuclear war, and collaborating with AI researchers, ethicists, and policymakers.Leveraging their expertise, trust, and global networks, these professionals can help ensure that AI development prioritises human wellbeing and safeguards humanity's future.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70269","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial General Intelligence and Its Threat to Public Health\",\"authors\":\"Richard C. Armitage\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied across healthcare and public health, with evidence of benefits including enhanced diagnostics, predictive modelling, operational efficiency, medical education, and disease surveillance.However, potential harms – such as algorithmic bias, unsafe recommendations, misinformation, privacy risks, and sycophantic reinforcement – pose challenges to safe implementation.Far less attention has been directed to the public health threats posed by artificial general intelligence (AGI), a hypothetical form of AI with human-level or greater cognitive capacities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This article explores the benefits and harms of current AI systems, introduces AGI and its distinguishing features, and examines the threats AGI could pose to public health and humanity's survival.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Unlike ‘narrow’ AI, AGI could autonomously learn, generalise across domains, and self-improve, potentially achieving superintelligence with unpredictable behaviours.AGI threatens public health through two broad categories: (1) misuse, where adversaries deploy AGI for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or to develop chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons; and (2) misalignment, where poorly aligned AGI pursues goals in harmful ways, leading to loss of human control, erosion of autonomy, and potentially existential risk.The population-level consequences include widespread unemployment, reduced trust in health systems, catastrophic biological threats, and risks to human survival.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Healthcare and public health professionals have a critical role in framing AGI risks as health threats, building coalitions akin to historic movements against nuclear war, and collaborating with AI researchers, ethicists, and policymakers.Leveraging their expertise, trust, and global networks, these professionals can help ensure that AI development prioritises human wellbeing and safeguards humanity's future.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70269\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70269\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)越来越多地应用于医疗保健和公共卫生领域,其益处包括增强诊断、预测建模、运营效率、医学教育和疾病监测。然而,潜在的危害——如算法偏差、不安全的推荐、错误信息、隐私风险和奉承强化——对安全实施构成了挑战。人工通用智能(AGI)是一种假想的人工智能形式,具有人类水平或更高的认知能力,而对其构成的公共卫生威胁的关注要少得多。目的探讨当前人工智能系统的利弊,介绍AGI及其特点,并探讨AGI可能对公共健康和人类生存构成的威胁。与“狭义”人工智能不同,AGI可以自主学习、跨领域推广和自我改进,有可能实现具有不可预测行为的超级智能。AGI通过两大类威胁公共卫生:(1)滥用,对手将AGI用于网络攻击、虚假信息活动或开发化学、生物、放射性和核(CBRN)武器;(2)不协调,即不协调的AGI以有害的方式追求目标,导致人类控制的丧失,自主性的侵蚀,以及潜在的生存风险。人口层面的后果包括广泛的失业、对卫生系统的信任度下降、灾难性的生物威胁以及对人类生存的风险。医疗保健和公共卫生专业人员在将人工智能风险视为健康威胁、建立类似于历史上反对核战争运动的联盟以及与人工智能研究人员、伦理学家和政策制定者合作方面发挥着关键作用。利用他们的专业知识、信任和全球网络,这些专业人士可以帮助确保人工智能发展优先考虑人类福祉,并保障人类的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial General Intelligence and Its Threat to Public Health

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied across healthcare and public health, with evidence of benefits including enhanced diagnostics, predictive modelling, operational efficiency, medical education, and disease surveillance.However, potential harms – such as algorithmic bias, unsafe recommendations, misinformation, privacy risks, and sycophantic reinforcement – pose challenges to safe implementation.Far less attention has been directed to the public health threats posed by artificial general intelligence (AGI), a hypothetical form of AI with human-level or greater cognitive capacities.

Objective

This article explores the benefits and harms of current AI systems, introduces AGI and its distinguishing features, and examines the threats AGI could pose to public health and humanity's survival.

Discussion

Unlike ‘narrow’ AI, AGI could autonomously learn, generalise across domains, and self-improve, potentially achieving superintelligence with unpredictable behaviours.AGI threatens public health through two broad categories: (1) misuse, where adversaries deploy AGI for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or to develop chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons; and (2) misalignment, where poorly aligned AGI pursues goals in harmful ways, leading to loss of human control, erosion of autonomy, and potentially existential risk.The population-level consequences include widespread unemployment, reduced trust in health systems, catastrophic biological threats, and risks to human survival.

Conclusion

Healthcare and public health professionals have a critical role in framing AGI risks as health threats, building coalitions akin to historic movements against nuclear war, and collaborating with AI researchers, ethicists, and policymakers.Leveraging their expertise, trust, and global networks, these professionals can help ensure that AI development prioritises human wellbeing and safeguards humanity's future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信