用于海洋中生态系统水生生物多样性检测的被动式环境DNA采样器

IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Dimitri Medetian, Alexia Delnatte, Julien Cambedouzou, Philippe Clair, David Cornu, Yvan Duhamel, Gilbert Dutto, Mikhael Bechelany, Thibault Geoffroy, Jean-Luc Rolland, Claude Miaud
{"title":"用于海洋中生态系统水生生物多样性检测的被动式环境DNA采样器","authors":"Dimitri Medetian,&nbsp;Alexia Delnatte,&nbsp;Julien Cambedouzou,&nbsp;Philippe Clair,&nbsp;David Cornu,&nbsp;Yvan Duhamel,&nbsp;Gilbert Dutto,&nbsp;Mikhael Bechelany,&nbsp;Thibault Geoffroy,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Rolland,&nbsp;Claude Miaud","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In aquatic ecosystems, environmental DNA (eDNA) can be collected from water samples to produce species inventories. One method for this is passive eDNA sampling, whose development for aquatic biodiversity monitoring is in its early stages. While several materials have been successfully tested for passive eDNA samplers (PEDS), methodological advances are still needed to explore their versatility as a complement to the more common method of active filtration. This study tested for the first time a PEDS using human-crafted material in controlled marine mesocosms (1 m<sup>3</sup>) containing one species, the European seabass (<i>Dicentrarchus labrax</i>) in different conditions of fish density (1, 5, 10, 100 fish per m<sup>3</sup>) and exposure times (30 min, 2 h, 8 h, 24 h). We then tested the influence of another source of eDNA on the sampler's performance by introducing another species, the Pacific oyster (<i>Magallana gigas</i>). In addition, we compared the efficacy of the method with active filtration. The PEDS we produced consisted of a small electrospun polyacrylonitrile (PAN) membrane encapsulated in a custom-made 3D-printed frame. Each sampler is low-cost, easy to manipulate, highly replicable, and customizable. A specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based assay for the seabass was developed. Results were analyzed with multiscale occupancy modeling and continuous response variable modeling. We found that the PAN-PEDS efficiently collected eDNA in a large volume (1 m<sup>3</sup>) of renewed water (1 m<sup>3</sup>/h), with a clear positive effect of high fish density on fish detection. The introduction of oysters did not significantly influence detection. Regarding exposure times, a range of results were obtained that could be attributed to the unreached equilibrium between eDNA shedding and degradation. While active eDNA collection (30 L) outperformed PAN-PEDS, the ongoing development of passive methods can provide new insights in aquatic species monitoring when spatio-temporal eDNA collection is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70183","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Passive Environmental DNA Sampler for Aquatic Biodiversity Detection Tested in Marine Mesocosms\",\"authors\":\"Dimitri Medetian,&nbsp;Alexia Delnatte,&nbsp;Julien Cambedouzou,&nbsp;Philippe Clair,&nbsp;David Cornu,&nbsp;Yvan Duhamel,&nbsp;Gilbert Dutto,&nbsp;Mikhael Bechelany,&nbsp;Thibault Geoffroy,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Rolland,&nbsp;Claude Miaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In aquatic ecosystems, environmental DNA (eDNA) can be collected from water samples to produce species inventories. One method for this is passive eDNA sampling, whose development for aquatic biodiversity monitoring is in its early stages. While several materials have been successfully tested for passive eDNA samplers (PEDS), methodological advances are still needed to explore their versatility as a complement to the more common method of active filtration. This study tested for the first time a PEDS using human-crafted material in controlled marine mesocosms (1 m<sup>3</sup>) containing one species, the European seabass (<i>Dicentrarchus labrax</i>) in different conditions of fish density (1, 5, 10, 100 fish per m<sup>3</sup>) and exposure times (30 min, 2 h, 8 h, 24 h). We then tested the influence of another source of eDNA on the sampler's performance by introducing another species, the Pacific oyster (<i>Magallana gigas</i>). In addition, we compared the efficacy of the method with active filtration. The PEDS we produced consisted of a small electrospun polyacrylonitrile (PAN) membrane encapsulated in a custom-made 3D-printed frame. Each sampler is low-cost, easy to manipulate, highly replicable, and customizable. A specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based assay for the seabass was developed. Results were analyzed with multiscale occupancy modeling and continuous response variable modeling. We found that the PAN-PEDS efficiently collected eDNA in a large volume (1 m<sup>3</sup>) of renewed water (1 m<sup>3</sup>/h), with a clear positive effect of high fish density on fish detection. The introduction of oysters did not significantly influence detection. Regarding exposure times, a range of results were obtained that could be attributed to the unreached equilibrium between eDNA shedding and degradation. While active eDNA collection (30 L) outperformed PAN-PEDS, the ongoing development of passive methods can provide new insights in aquatic species monitoring when spatio-temporal eDNA collection is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70183\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在水生生态系统中,可以从水样中收集环境DNA (eDNA)来编制物种清单。其中一种方法是被动eDNA采样,其用于水生生物多样性监测的发展尚处于早期阶段。虽然几种材料已经成功地测试了被动eDNA采样器(PEDS),但方法上的进步仍然需要探索它们的多功能性,作为更常见的主动过滤方法的补充。本研究首次使用人造材料在含有一种欧洲鲈鱼(Dicentrarchus labrax)的可控海洋中生态系统(1 m3)中测试了不同鱼密度(1、5、10、100条鱼/ m3)和暴露时间(30分钟、2小时、8小时、24小时)的PEDS。然后,我们通过引入另一种物种太平洋牡蛎(Magallana gigas)来测试另一种eDNA来源对采样器性能的影响。此外,我们还比较了该方法与主动过滤的效果。我们生产的PEDS包括一个小的静电纺聚丙烯腈(PAN)膜,封装在定制的3d打印框架中。每个采样器成本低,易于操作,高度可复制,可定制。建立了一种基于聚合酶链反应的特异性定量分析方法。采用多尺度占用模型和连续响应变量模型对结果进行分析。我们发现PAN-PEDS在大体积(1 m3)更新水(1 m3/h)中有效收集eDNA,高鱼类密度对鱼类检测有明显的积极作用。牡蛎的引入对检测没有显著影响。关于暴露时间,获得的一系列结果可归因于eDNA脱落和降解之间未达到的平衡。虽然主动eDNA收集(30 L)优于PAN-PEDS,但当需要收集时空eDNA时,被动方法的不断发展可以为水生物种监测提供新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Passive Environmental DNA Sampler for Aquatic Biodiversity Detection Tested in Marine Mesocosms

A Passive Environmental DNA Sampler for Aquatic Biodiversity Detection Tested in Marine Mesocosms

In aquatic ecosystems, environmental DNA (eDNA) can be collected from water samples to produce species inventories. One method for this is passive eDNA sampling, whose development for aquatic biodiversity monitoring is in its early stages. While several materials have been successfully tested for passive eDNA samplers (PEDS), methodological advances are still needed to explore their versatility as a complement to the more common method of active filtration. This study tested for the first time a PEDS using human-crafted material in controlled marine mesocosms (1 m3) containing one species, the European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in different conditions of fish density (1, 5, 10, 100 fish per m3) and exposure times (30 min, 2 h, 8 h, 24 h). We then tested the influence of another source of eDNA on the sampler's performance by introducing another species, the Pacific oyster (Magallana gigas). In addition, we compared the efficacy of the method with active filtration. The PEDS we produced consisted of a small electrospun polyacrylonitrile (PAN) membrane encapsulated in a custom-made 3D-printed frame. Each sampler is low-cost, easy to manipulate, highly replicable, and customizable. A specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based assay for the seabass was developed. Results were analyzed with multiscale occupancy modeling and continuous response variable modeling. We found that the PAN-PEDS efficiently collected eDNA in a large volume (1 m3) of renewed water (1 m3/h), with a clear positive effect of high fish density on fish detection. The introduction of oysters did not significantly influence detection. Regarding exposure times, a range of results were obtained that could be attributed to the unreached equilibrium between eDNA shedding and degradation. While active eDNA collection (30 L) outperformed PAN-PEDS, the ongoing development of passive methods can provide new insights in aquatic species monitoring when spatio-temporal eDNA collection is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信