可持续供应系统：扩展奥尔德森的横断分析，以检测价值损失、权力不对称和表现不佳的市场

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting

AMS Review Pub Date : 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1007/s13162-025-00307-y

Ben Wooliscroft, James Wilkes

{"title":"可持续供应系统：扩展奥尔德森的横断分析，以检测价值损失、权力不对称和表现不佳的市场","authors":"Ben Wooliscroft, James Wilkes","doi":"10.1007/s13162-025-00307-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Business research has offered many tools to understand the opportunity for single firms to create or realise value in the provisioning system. The majority of sustainability tools also relate to single firms, or households. Sustainability is a whole of system shift and we require tools to understand the relationship between different members of the provisioning system and the distribution of costs (internal and externalities) and profits through the system. Building on the work of Wroe Alderson, we provide a tool—the extended transvection—to analyse a provisioning system that provides insights into: information flows, value creation/capture/loss, risk, externalities, equity and fairness, and underperforming provisioning systems. Together these insights allow us to see the sustainability of the provisioning system. The extended transvection also allows for considering scenarios regarding adjusted/alternate provisioning systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"15 1-2","pages":"59 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13162-025-00307-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable provisioning systems: Extending Alderson’s transvection analysis to detect value loss, power asymmetry and underperforming markets\",\"authors\":\"Ben Wooliscroft, James Wilkes\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13162-025-00307-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Business research has offered many tools to understand the opportunity for single firms to create or realise value in the provisioning system. The majority of sustainability tools also relate to single firms, or households. Sustainability is a whole of system shift and we require tools to understand the relationship between different members of the provisioning system and the distribution of costs (internal and externalities) and profits through the system. Building on the work of Wroe Alderson, we provide a tool—the extended transvection—to analyse a provisioning system that provides insights into: information flows, value creation/capture/loss, risk, externalities, equity and fairness, and underperforming provisioning systems. Together these insights allow us to see the sustainability of the provisioning system. The extended transvection also allows for considering scenarios regarding adjusted/alternate provisioning systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMS Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1-2\",\"pages\":\"59 - 73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13162-025-00307-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMS Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-025-00307-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-025-00307-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

商业研究提供了许多工具来理解单个公司在供应系统中创造或实现价值的机会。大多数可持续性工具也与单个公司或家庭有关。可持续发展是整个系统的转变，我们需要工具来理解供应系统中不同成员之间的关系，以及成本（内部和外部）和利润在系统中的分配。在Wroe Alderson工作的基础上，我们提供了一种工具——扩展的横向分析——来分析一个供应系统，该系统提供了以下方面的见解：信息流、价值创造/获取/损失、风险、外部性、公平和公平，以及表现不佳的供应系统。这些见解使我们能够看到供应系统的可持续性。扩展的横切还允许考虑有关调整/备用供应系统的场景。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Sustainable provisioning systems: Extending Alderson’s transvection analysis to detect value loss, power asymmetry and underperforming markets

Business research has offered many tools to understand the opportunity for single firms to create or realise value in the provisioning system. The majority of sustainability tools also relate to single firms, or households. Sustainability is a whole of system shift and we require tools to understand the relationship between different members of the provisioning system and the distribution of costs (internal and externalities) and profits through the system. Building on the work of Wroe Alderson, we provide a tool—the extended transvection—to analyse a provisioning system that provides insights into: information flows, value creation/capture/loss, risk, externalities, equity and fairness, and underperforming provisioning systems. Together these insights allow us to see the sustainability of the provisioning system. The extended transvection also allows for considering scenarios regarding adjusted/alternate provisioning systems.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

AMS Review Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing

CiteScore

14.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication. The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.