{"title":"在服务生态系统的功能可持续性和结构可持续性之间取得动态平衡","authors":"Petter Braathen","doi":"10.1007/s13162-025-00305-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable service provision in large-scale and complex ecosystems requires balancing structural resilience with functional alignment. This paper proposes a holistic framework for service ecosystem sustainability, conceptualizing these dual dimensions as (1) structural sustainability—the system’s capacity for self-maintenance and resilience—and (2) functional sustainability—the system’s ability to uphold the broader macrosystem it depends on. These concepts are integrated into a sustainability state map that distinguishes four possible holistic states, each reflecting unique challenges and opportunities. Building on complex adaptive systems theory and the notion of adaptive cycles, the paper illustrates how service ecosystems traverse these states as they respond to internal tensions and external pressures. We further explain how strategy models such as exploration-exploitation, ambidexterity, and creative destruction can deliberately guide service ecosystems between states to maintain—or recover—holistic sustainability. In doing so, the framework elucidates why sustainability is inherently dynamic and evolutionary, shaped by multilevel interactions spanning individuals, organizations, and societal institutions. Ultimately, we offer scholars, practitioners, and policymakers a diagnostic tool and a set of strategic interventions to navigate sustainability transitions more effectively in service ecosystems facing persistent social and environmental concerns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"15 1-2","pages":"112 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13162-025-00305-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Striking dynamic balance between functional and structural sustainability in service ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"Petter Braathen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13162-025-00305-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sustainable service provision in large-scale and complex ecosystems requires balancing structural resilience with functional alignment. This paper proposes a holistic framework for service ecosystem sustainability, conceptualizing these dual dimensions as (1) structural sustainability—the system’s capacity for self-maintenance and resilience—and (2) functional sustainability—the system’s ability to uphold the broader macrosystem it depends on. These concepts are integrated into a sustainability state map that distinguishes four possible holistic states, each reflecting unique challenges and opportunities. Building on complex adaptive systems theory and the notion of adaptive cycles, the paper illustrates how service ecosystems traverse these states as they respond to internal tensions and external pressures. We further explain how strategy models such as exploration-exploitation, ambidexterity, and creative destruction can deliberately guide service ecosystems between states to maintain—or recover—holistic sustainability. In doing so, the framework elucidates why sustainability is inherently dynamic and evolutionary, shaped by multilevel interactions spanning individuals, organizations, and societal institutions. Ultimately, we offer scholars, practitioners, and policymakers a diagnostic tool and a set of strategic interventions to navigate sustainability transitions more effectively in service ecosystems facing persistent social and environmental concerns.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMS Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1-2\",\"pages\":\"112 - 126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13162-025-00305-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMS Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-025-00305-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-025-00305-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
Striking dynamic balance between functional and structural sustainability in service ecosystems
Sustainable service provision in large-scale and complex ecosystems requires balancing structural resilience with functional alignment. This paper proposes a holistic framework for service ecosystem sustainability, conceptualizing these dual dimensions as (1) structural sustainability—the system’s capacity for self-maintenance and resilience—and (2) functional sustainability—the system’s ability to uphold the broader macrosystem it depends on. These concepts are integrated into a sustainability state map that distinguishes four possible holistic states, each reflecting unique challenges and opportunities. Building on complex adaptive systems theory and the notion of adaptive cycles, the paper illustrates how service ecosystems traverse these states as they respond to internal tensions and external pressures. We further explain how strategy models such as exploration-exploitation, ambidexterity, and creative destruction can deliberately guide service ecosystems between states to maintain—or recover—holistic sustainability. In doing so, the framework elucidates why sustainability is inherently dynamic and evolutionary, shaped by multilevel interactions spanning individuals, organizations, and societal institutions. Ultimately, we offer scholars, practitioners, and policymakers a diagnostic tool and a set of strategic interventions to navigate sustainability transitions more effectively in service ecosystems facing persistent social and environmental concerns.
AMS ReviewBusiness, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍:
The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication. The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.