在成人脊柱手术中降低种植体密度以避免近端连接失败:计算机模型和模拟

IF 2.5 Q3 Medicine
Morteza Rasouligandomani PhD , Alex del Arco MD-PhD , Tomaso Villa PhD , Luigi La Barbera PhD , Miguel A. González Ballester PhD , Fabio Galbusera PhD , Jérôme Noailly PhD
{"title":"在成人脊柱手术中降低种植体密度以避免近端连接失败:计算机模型和模拟","authors":"Morteza Rasouligandomani PhD ,&nbsp;Alex del Arco MD-PhD ,&nbsp;Tomaso Villa PhD ,&nbsp;Luigi La Barbera PhD ,&nbsp;Miguel A. González Ballester PhD ,&nbsp;Fabio Galbusera PhD ,&nbsp;Jérôme Noailly PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Proximal Junctional Failure (PJF) is a common complication in Adult Spine Deformity (ASD) surgeries, often leading to reoperations. While revision surgeries with osteotomies carry high complication rate of 34.8%, alternatives such as hardware proximal extension may increase PJF risk in patients with severe Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) scores. Implant Density Reduction (IDR) has emerged to mitigate PJF risk. This study assessed the impact of IDR on PJF risk and explored sub-optimal strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two patient-personalized Finite Element (FE) models were used and expanded into a virtual cohort. Implant Density (ID), rod material, bone quality, and GAP were systematically varied. Thoracolumbar FE models were developed using structured Statistical Shape Modeling (SSM). Biomechanical metrics of Intervertebral Disk (IVD) fiber strain, Screw Pull-out Force (SPF), and rod stress, were evaluated. Trade-off analyses could determine sub-optimal configurations avoiding PJF.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>IDR significantly decreased IVD strain (up to −70%) and improved screw stability (up to +142%), for patients with titanium (Ti) rods and normal bone. However, IDR effectiveness was limited for cases with GAP ≥12, osteoporotic bone, and Cobalt-Chromium (Cr-Co) rods. No IDR strategy could prevent PJF for cases with GAP 12 or 13, regardless of rod type. For cases with GAP 11 and Upper Instrumented Vertebra (UIV) at T10, IDR was effective with only Ti rods. For cases with GAP 13 and UIV at T3, none of IDRs, independent of rod material, offered benefit. Notably, Ti rods may support IDR-based risk reduction in borderline cases, such as GAP 12, UIV at T3.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>IDR is a promising strategy to lower PJF risk in high-risk spine revision cases, though its effectiveness depends on surgical and anatomical factors. This study provides an in-silico tool to support personalized surgical planning and guide future clinical trials aimed at reducing reoperations and healthcare costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100770"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implant density reduction to avoid proximal junctional failure in adult spine surgery: Computer models and simulations\",\"authors\":\"Morteza Rasouligandomani PhD ,&nbsp;Alex del Arco MD-PhD ,&nbsp;Tomaso Villa PhD ,&nbsp;Luigi La Barbera PhD ,&nbsp;Miguel A. González Ballester PhD ,&nbsp;Fabio Galbusera PhD ,&nbsp;Jérôme Noailly PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Proximal Junctional Failure (PJF) is a common complication in Adult Spine Deformity (ASD) surgeries, often leading to reoperations. While revision surgeries with osteotomies carry high complication rate of 34.8%, alternatives such as hardware proximal extension may increase PJF risk in patients with severe Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) scores. Implant Density Reduction (IDR) has emerged to mitigate PJF risk. This study assessed the impact of IDR on PJF risk and explored sub-optimal strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two patient-personalized Finite Element (FE) models were used and expanded into a virtual cohort. Implant Density (ID), rod material, bone quality, and GAP were systematically varied. Thoracolumbar FE models were developed using structured Statistical Shape Modeling (SSM). Biomechanical metrics of Intervertebral Disk (IVD) fiber strain, Screw Pull-out Force (SPF), and rod stress, were evaluated. Trade-off analyses could determine sub-optimal configurations avoiding PJF.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>IDR significantly decreased IVD strain (up to −70%) and improved screw stability (up to +142%), for patients with titanium (Ti) rods and normal bone. However, IDR effectiveness was limited for cases with GAP ≥12, osteoporotic bone, and Cobalt-Chromium (Cr-Co) rods. No IDR strategy could prevent PJF for cases with GAP 12 or 13, regardless of rod type. For cases with GAP 11 and Upper Instrumented Vertebra (UIV) at T10, IDR was effective with only Ti rods. For cases with GAP 13 and UIV at T3, none of IDRs, independent of rod material, offered benefit. Notably, Ti rods may support IDR-based risk reduction in borderline cases, such as GAP 12, UIV at T3.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>IDR is a promising strategy to lower PJF risk in high-risk spine revision cases, though its effectiveness depends on surgical and anatomical factors. This study provides an in-silico tool to support personalized surgical planning and guide future clinical trials aimed at reducing reoperations and healthcare costs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Spine Society Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100770\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Spine Society Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548425001908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548425001908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近端连接功能衰竭(PJF)是成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术的常见并发症,经常导致再手术。虽然骨截骨翻修手术的并发症发生率高达34.8%,但对于具有严重Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP)评分的患者,其他选择如硬体近端延伸可能会增加PJF的风险。种植体密度降低(IDR)已经出现,以减轻PJF的风险。本研究评估了IDR对PJF风险的影响,并探讨了次优策略。方法采用两种患者个性化有限元模型,并将其扩展为虚拟队列。种植体密度(ID)、棒材料、骨质量和GAP系统变化。采用结构化统计形状建模(SSM)建立胸腰椎有限元模型。评估椎间盘(IVD)纤维应变、螺钉拔出力(SPF)和棒应力的生物力学指标。权衡分析可以确定避免PJF的次优配置。结果对于钛(Ti)棒和正常骨患者,sidr可显著降低IVD应变(高达- 70%),提高螺钉稳定性(高达+142%)。然而,对于GAP≥12、骨质疏松和钴铬(Cr-Co)棒的病例,IDR的有效性有限。对于GAP为12或13的患者,无论棒子类型如何,IDR策略都不能预防PJF。对于GAP 11和上固定椎体(UIV)在T10时的病例,IDR仅使用Ti棒有效。对于GAP 13和UIV在T3的病例,与棒材料无关的idr均未提供益处。值得注意的是,钛棒可能支持基于idr的边缘病例的风险降低,例如GAP 12, T3时的UIV。结论sidr是降低高危脊柱翻修病例PJF风险的有效策略,但其效果取决于手术和解剖因素。该研究提供了一种支持个性化手术计划的计算机工具,并指导未来旨在减少再手术和医疗费用的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implant density reduction to avoid proximal junctional failure in adult spine surgery: Computer models and simulations

Background

Proximal Junctional Failure (PJF) is a common complication in Adult Spine Deformity (ASD) surgeries, often leading to reoperations. While revision surgeries with osteotomies carry high complication rate of 34.8%, alternatives such as hardware proximal extension may increase PJF risk in patients with severe Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) scores. Implant Density Reduction (IDR) has emerged to mitigate PJF risk. This study assessed the impact of IDR on PJF risk and explored sub-optimal strategies.

Methods

Two patient-personalized Finite Element (FE) models were used and expanded into a virtual cohort. Implant Density (ID), rod material, bone quality, and GAP were systematically varied. Thoracolumbar FE models were developed using structured Statistical Shape Modeling (SSM). Biomechanical metrics of Intervertebral Disk (IVD) fiber strain, Screw Pull-out Force (SPF), and rod stress, were evaluated. Trade-off analyses could determine sub-optimal configurations avoiding PJF.

Results

IDR significantly decreased IVD strain (up to −70%) and improved screw stability (up to +142%), for patients with titanium (Ti) rods and normal bone. However, IDR effectiveness was limited for cases with GAP ≥12, osteoporotic bone, and Cobalt-Chromium (Cr-Co) rods. No IDR strategy could prevent PJF for cases with GAP 12 or 13, regardless of rod type. For cases with GAP 11 and Upper Instrumented Vertebra (UIV) at T10, IDR was effective with only Ti rods. For cases with GAP 13 and UIV at T3, none of IDRs, independent of rod material, offered benefit. Notably, Ti rods may support IDR-based risk reduction in borderline cases, such as GAP 12, UIV at T3.

Conclusions

IDR is a promising strategy to lower PJF risk in high-risk spine revision cases, though its effectiveness depends on surgical and anatomical factors. This study provides an in-silico tool to support personalized surgical planning and guide future clinical trials aimed at reducing reoperations and healthcare costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信